# COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC — Notice of Probable Violation

**Citation:** CPF 220061002  
**Type / status:** enforcement / historical  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2006-10-30

CLOSED notice of probable violation citing 192.805.

## Document text

Notice of Probable Violation involving COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulation as 192.805. The case was opened on 2006-10-30 and is reported as closed as of 2009-01-06. Proposed civil penalty: $35,000. Assessed civil penalty: $35,000. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

220061002_FinalOrder_11072007.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220061002/220061002_FinalOrder_11072007.pdf

220061002_finalorder_11072007_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220061002/220061002_finalorder_11072007_text.pdf

220061002_finalorder_11072007_text.pdf

O
U S Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Ave S E
Washington DC 20590
SOV 7 2007
Mr. Reed Robinson
Vice President, Field Services
Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.
P. O. Box 1273
Charleston, WV 25325
RE: CPF No. 2-2006-1002
Dear Mr. Robinson:
Enclosed is the Final Order issued by the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety in the
above-referenced case. It makes a finding of violation and requires certain corrective actions, I
acknowledge receipt of wire transfer 0061130014421 and accept payment dated November 30,
2006 for $35, 000 as payment in full of the civil penalty assessed in this Final Order, Your
receipt of the Final Order constitutes service of that document under 49 C. F. R. ) 190. 5. At such
time that the terms of the compliance order are completed, as determined by the Director,
Southern Region, this enforcement action will be closed.
Sincerely,
James Reynolds
Pipeline Compliance Registry
Office of Pipeline Safety
cc: David Kirkland, Manager-Pipeline Services, Columbia Gas
Linda Daugherty, Director, OPS Southern Region
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT RE UESTED



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20590
In the Matter of
)
)
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, )
Respondent
)
)
)
CPF No. 2-2006-1002
FINAL ORDER
Between June 6 and June 10, 2005, and November 28 — December 2, 2005 pursuant to 49 U. S. C.
) 60117, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Office
of Pipeline Safety (OPS), Southern Region, conducted an inspection of the natural gas pipeline
facilities of Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (Respondent) in Kentucky and reviewed
records at your Cattletsburg, Pikeville and Winchester offices. As a result of the inspection, the
Director, Southern Region, OPS, issued to Respondent, by letter dated October 30, 2006, a
Notice of Probable Violation, Proposed Civil Penalty, and Proposed Compliance Order (Notice).
In accordance with 49 C. F. R. ) 190. 207, the Notice proposed finding that Respondent had
violated 49 C. F. R, $ 192. 805, assessing a total civil penalty of $35, 000 for the alleged violation,
and ordering that Respondent take certain measures to correct the alleged violation.
Respondent replied to the Notice by letter dated, December 1, 2006 (Response). Respondent did
not contest the allegation of violation and submitted payment for the proposed civil penalty.
Respondent did not request a hearing and therefore has waived its right to one.
FINDINGS OF VIOLATION
Item 1 in the Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C. F. R. $ 192. 805, which provides:
g 192. S05. Qualification program.
Each operator shall have and follow a written qualification
program. The program shall include provisions to;
(a) Identify covered tasks;
(b) Ensure through evaluation that individuals
performing covered tasks are qualified;. . . .
The Notice alleged that Respondent did not ensure through evaluation that individuals
performing the covered task "Conduct gas leakage surveys" were qualified. Grade 3 Leak survey



results audited for the Lockwood and Winchester areas were found to be unacceptable and
indicative of individuals not understanding how to perform this particular task.
Respondent's own procedures, entitled "Columbia Gas Transmission Operating Procedures, Plan
No. 220. 03. 01, Section 3. 3, 3, " permits Grade 3 Leaks to be monitored without repair. A Grade 3
Leak, in a rural area, is defined by Respondent's procedures as a leak with a measured gas in air
value of less than 50'10 when measured in a bar hole. The Grade 3 Leak survey results were
reviewed for the Lockwood and Winchester areas and found to be unacceptable. The results of
the Grade 3 Leak surveys for 2004 and 2005 are detailed in a table in the Notice. All locations in
the Lockwood area indicate 100'10 gas. The value of 100'10 exceeds Respondent's criteria of less
than 50'/o gas for a Grade 3 Leak, though all these locations have continued to be classified as
Grade 3 leaks. Most of the locations in the Winchester area have a 10 Lower Explosive Limit
(LEL) value and a 10 Gas value. These values are neither consistent nor logical because 100/0
LEL is approximately 5'10 gas.
During the inspection, these Grade 3 Leak survey results were discussed with Respondent,
Respondent indicated that the 100'10 Gas values in the Lockwood area were the result of the 10
LEL value being incorrectly entered into the 10 Gas field of the MAXIMO database, The 10 Gas
value, which is needed to classify leaks, was not entered at all. Respondent could not explain the
data relative to the Winchester Area, which demonstrates that these individuals do not
understand the proper method to perform the covered task, "Conduct gas leakage stuveys. "
Respondent did not contest the allegation of violation in the Notice. Accordingly, I find that
Respondent violated 49 C. F. R. ) 195. 805 by failing to use an evaluation method to ensure that
individuals performing the subject-covered task were qualified. This finding of violation will be
considered a prior offense in any subsequent enforcement action taken against Respondent.
ASSESSMENT OF PENALTY
The Notice proposed a $35, 000 civil penalty for violation of 49 C. F, R. $ 192. 805(a).
Under 49 U. S. C. $ 60122, Respondent is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $100, 000 per
violation for each day of the violation up to a maximum of $1, 000, 000 for any related series of
violations.
49 U. S. C. $ 60122 and 49 C. F. R. $ 190. 225 require that, in determining the amount of the civil
penalty, I consider the following criteria: natme, circumstances, and gravity of the violation;
degree of Respondent's culpability; history of Respondent's prior offenses; Respondent's ability
to pay the penalty; good faith by Respondent in attempting to achieve compliance; the effect on
Respondent's ability to continue in business; and such other matters as ~ustice may require.
The proposed penalty of $35, 000 is based upon Respondent's failure to ensure through
evaluation that individuals performing covered task "Conduct gas leakage surveys" were
qualified and its failure to ensure that the evaluation method used was adequate to qualify



individuals to perform the subject-covered. Accordingly, having reviewed the record and
considered the assessment criteria, I hereby assess Respondent a civil penalty of $35, 000 for
violation of 49 C, F. R. $ 192. 805, which amount has already been paid by the Respondent and
received by OPS.
COMPLIANCE ORDER
The Notice proposed a compliance order with respect to Item I for violation of 49 C. F, R. $
192, 805. Under 49 U. S. C. $ 60118(a), each person who engages in the transportation of gas or
who owns or operates a pipeline facility is required to comply with the applicable safety
standards established under chapter 601. Pursuant to the authority of 49 U. S. C. $ 60118(b) and
49 C. F. R. $ 190, 217, Respondent is ordered to take the following actions to ensure compliance
with the pipeline safety regulations applicable to its operations. Respondent must—
1. Conduct an evaluation of the Operator Qualification Requirements and Evaluation
methods detailed in the Columbia Gas Transmission Operator Qualification Plan
for the covered task entitled, "Conduct gas leakage surveys.
" This evaluation
should determine what inadequacies exist in the current plan that resulted in the
unacceptable Grade 3 Leak survey results found in the Lockwood and Winchester
areas. A written evaluation report shall be submitted within 30 days of your
receipt of this Final Order.
2. Revise the Columbia Gas Transmission Operator Qualification Plan to address the
results of the evaluation described in Item 1 above. Submit the revised Columbia
Gas Transmission Operator Qualification Plan within 60 days of your receipt of
this Final Order.
3. Resurvey the Subject Grade 3 Leak areas within 30 days following receipt of this
Final Order. Submit the leakage survey results and the qualification records of
the individual(s) performing the leakage surveys,
4. Submit copies of all reports, documentation, and findings to demonstrate
completion of the tasks detailed above to the Director, OPS, Southern Region,
233 Peachtree Street, Suite 600, Atlanta, GA 30303. These records will be
subject to future inspections.
5. The Director, OPS, Southern Region may grant an extension of time for
compliance with any of the terms of this Final Order for good cause. A request
for an extension must be in writing.
Failure to comply with this Final Order may result in the assessment of civil penalties of up to
$100, 000 per violation per day, or in the referral of the case for judicial enforcement.



Under 49 C. F. R. ) 190. 215, Respondent has a right to submit a Petition for Reconsideration of
this Final Order. The petition must be received within 20 days of Respondent's receipt of this
Final Order and must contain a brief statement of the issue(s). The terms of the Final Order,
including any required corrective action, shall remain in full effect unless the Associate
Administrator, upon request, grants a stay. The terms and conditions of this Final Order are
effective on receipt.
XOV 7 2007
J ffr y . Wiese
so iate Administrator
fo '
eline Safety
Date Issued

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/220061002>
- Source ID: `phmsa-enforcement`
- SHA-256: `0a5da9598c96f8fead734517edf2cbb9e9f03e2e13f28f1774997e8b81c68677`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T04:44:44.458Z
- Exported: 2026-08-23T10:58:49.505Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-enforcement-220061002`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "cpf": "220061002",
  "operator": "COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC",
  "region": "Southern",
  "pipelineType": "GAS INTERSTATE ONSHORE",
  "caseStatus": "CLOSED",
  "citedSections": [
    "192.805"
  ],
  "dataAsOf": "08/04/2026 12PM",
  "caseDataAsOf": "2026-08-04",
  "attachmentCount": 2,
  "attachments": [
    {
      "name": "220061002_FinalOrder_11072007.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220061002/220061002_FinalOrder_11072007.pdf",
      "bytes": 195464,
      "category": "agency_document"
    },
    {
      "name": "220061002_finalorder_11072007_text.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220061002/220061002_finalorder_11072007_text.pdf",
      "bytes": 255986,
      "category": "agency_document"
    }
  ],
  "extractedAgencyDocumentCount": 1,
  "attachmentPolicy": "Official attachment links are retained. Agency-issued documents may also include a verified local PDF and page-level text representation.",
  "jurisdiction": "US",
  "operatorName": "COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC"
}
```
