# DCP MIDSTREAM — Notice of Probable Violation

**Citation:** CPF 220112002  
**Type / status:** enforcement / historical  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2011-03-04

CLOSED notice of probable violation citing 192.491(c).

## Document text

Notice of Probable Violation involving DCP MIDSTREAM. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulation as 192.491(c). The case was opened on 2011-03-04 and is reported as closed as of 2011-06-13. Proposed civil penalty: $8,000. Assessed civil penalty: $8,000. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

220112002_Final Order_06132011.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220112002/220112002_Final%20Order_06132011.pdf

220112002_Final Order_06132011_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220112002/220112002_Final%20Order_06132011_text.pdf

220112002_NOPV_PCP_03042011.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220112002/220112002_NOPV_PCP_03042011.pdf

220112002_NOPV_PCP_03042011_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220112002/220112002_NOPV_PCP_03042011_text.pdf

220112002_Operator Response_03312011.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220112002/220112002_Operator%20Response_03312011.pdf

220112002_Final Order_06132011_text.pdf

JUN 13 2011
Mr. Brent Backes
Group Vice President, General Counsel
DCP Midstream
370 17th Street, Suite 2500
Denver, CO 80202
Re: CPF No. 2-2011-2002
Dear Mr. Backes:
Enclosed please find the Final Order issued in the above-referenced case. It makes a finding of
violation and assesses a civil penalty of $8,000. This is to acknowledge receipt of payment of
the full penalty amount, by wire transfer, dated April 1, 2011. This enforcement action is now
closed. Service of the Final Order by certified mail is deemed effective upon the date of mailing,
or as otherwise provided under 49 C.F.R. § 190.5.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey D. Wiese
Associate Administrator
for Pipeline Safety
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Alan Mayberry, Deputy Associate Administrator for Field Operations, Pipeline Safety
Mr. Wayne T. Lemoi, Director, Southern Region, PHMSA
Ms. Alison E. Barry, Assistant General Counsel, DCP Midstream
Mr. Mark Falkenhagen, Area Supervisor, Spectra Energy Transmission
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED [7005 1160 0001 0075 9480]



U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590
____________________________________
In the Matter of )
DCP Midstream, ) CPF No. 2-2011-2002
)
)
)
Respondent. )
___________________________________ )
FINAL ORDER
On October 18-21, 2010, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60117, a representative of the Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS),
conducted an on-site pipeline safety inspection of the facilities and records of DCP Midstream
(DCP or Respondent) Dauphin Island offshore pipeline in the Gulf of Mexico and Coden, AL.
The offshore pipelines consist of the Deepwater and Shallow water systems. DCP Midstream
operates in 18 states and gathers raw natural gas through 60,000 miles of gathering pipe and
processes it through 60 owned or operated plants.
1
As a result of the inspection, the Director, Southern Region, OPS (Director), issued to
Respondent, by letter dated March 4, 2011, a Notice of Probable Violation and Proposed Civil
Penalty (Notice). In accordance with 49 C.F.R. § 190.207, the Notice proposed finding that
Respondent had violated 49 C.F.R. §192.491(c) and proposed assessing a civil penalty of $8,000
for the alleged violation.
DCP responded to the Notice by letter dated March 31, 2011 (Response). The company did not
contest the allegations of violation and expressed its intention to pay the proposed civil penalty
of $8,000, as provided in 49 C.F.R. § 190.227. Payment of the penalty by wire transfer, dated
April 1, 2011, serves to close the case with prejudice to Respondent.
FINDING OF VIOLATION
In its Response, DCP did not contest the allegation in the Notice that it violated 49 C.F.R. Part
192, as follows:
1 DCP Midstream is a 50-50 joint venture between Spectra Energy and ConocoPhillips.
http://www.spectraenergy.com/Operations/DCP-Midstream (last visited 5/31/2011).



2
Item 1: The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 192.491(c), which states in
relevant part:
§ 192.491 Corrosion control records.
(a) . . . .
(c) Each operator shall maintain a record of each test, survey, or inspection required
by this subpart in sufficient detail to demonstrate the adequacy of corrosion control
measures or that a corrosive condition does not exist. These records must be retained for
at least 5 years, except that records related to §§192.465(a) and (e) and 192.475(b) must
be retained for as long as the pipeline remains in service.
The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 192.491(c) by failing to maintain
internal corrosion coupon monitoring records in sufficient detail to demonstrate the adequacy of
this internal corrosion control measures. The Notice also alleged that DCP failed to provide
records justifying an approximate 6-month time gap during which no coupons were monitored.
As a result of the ten unexplained 6-month time gaps, as detailed in the Notice, the Company
was unable to confirm that it had monitored each coupon two times per calendar year, in
accordance with § 192.477.2
Respondent did not contest this allegation of violation. Accordingly, based upon a review of all
of the evidence, I find that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 192.491(c) by failing to maintain
internal corrosion coupon monitoring records in sufficient detail to demonstrate the adequacy of
this internal corrosion control measures.
ASSESSMENT OF PENALTY
Under 49 U.S.C. § 60122, Respondent is subject to an administrative civil penalty not to exceed
$100,000 per violation for each day of the violation, up to a maximum of $1,000,000 for any
related series of violations.
49 U.S.C. § 60122 and 49 C.F.R. § 190.225 require that, in determining the amount of a civil
penalty, I consider the following criteria: the nature, circumstances, and gravity of the violation,
including adverse impact on the environment; the degree of Respondent’s culpability; the history
of Respondent’s prior offenses; the Respondent’s ability to pay the penalty and any effect that
the penalty may have on its ability to continue doing business; and the good faith of Respondent
in attempting to comply with the pipeline safety regulations. In addition, I may consider the
economic benefit gained from the violation without any reduction because of subsequent
damages, and such other matters as justice may require.
2 49 C.F.R. §192.477 requires that if corrosive gas is being transported, coupons or other suitable means must be
used to determine the effectiveness of the steps taken to minimize internal corrosion. Each coupon or other means of
monitoring internal corrosion must be checked two times each calendar year, but with intervals not exceeding 7 ½
months.



3
Having reviewed the record and considered the assessment criteria, I assess Respondent a civil
penalty of $8,000, already paid by Respondent.
The terms and conditions of this Final Order are effective upon service in accordance with 49
C.F.R. § 190.5.
___________________________________ __________________________
Jeffrey D. Wiese Date Issued
Associate Administrator
for Pipeline Safety

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/220112002>
- Source ID: `phmsa-enforcement`
- SHA-256: `aee978d3ba05a5cc92c05592a09ea88d6720d84b7de18057fbc78ee9c1ed25e3`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T04:44:44.458Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T22:28:41.432Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-enforcement-220112002`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "cpf": "220112002",
  "operator": "DCP MIDSTREAM",
  "region": "Southern",
  "pipelineType": "GAS INTRASTATE OFFSHORE",
  "caseStatus": "CLOSED",
  "citedSections": [
    "192.491(c)"
  ],
  "dataAsOf": "08/04/2026 12PM",
  "caseDataAsOf": "2026-08-04",
  "attachmentCount": 5,
  "attachments": [
    {
      "name": "220112002_Final Order_06132011.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220112002/220112002_Final%20Order_06132011.pdf",
      "bytes": 176244,
      "category": "agency_document"
    },
    {
      "name": "220112002_Final Order_06132011_text.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220112002/220112002_Final%20Order_06132011_text.pdf",
      "bytes": 23365,
      "category": "agency_document"
    },
    {
      "name": "220112002_NOPV_PCP_03042011.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220112002/220112002_NOPV_PCP_03042011.pdf",
      "bytes": 134328,
      "category": "case_document"
    },
    {
      "name": "220112002_NOPV_PCP_03042011_text.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220112002/220112002_NOPV_PCP_03042011_text.pdf",
      "bytes": 26907,
      "category": "case_document"
    },
    {
      "name": "220112002_Operator Response_03312011.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220112002/220112002_Operator%20Response_03312011.pdf",
      "bytes": 173152,
      "category": "party_submission"
    }
  ],
  "extractedAgencyDocumentCount": 1,
  "attachmentPolicy": "Official attachment links are retained. Agency-issued documents may also include a verified local PDF and page-level text representation.",
  "jurisdiction": "US",
  "operatorName": "DCP MIDSTREAM"
}
```
