# DUKE ENERGY KENTUCKY - LIQUID — Warning Letter

**Citation:** CPF 220126013W  
**Type / status:** enforcement / historical  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2012-07-12

CLOSED warning letter citing 195.440(c).

## Document text

Warning Letter involving DUKE ENERGY KENTUCKY - LIQUID. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulation as 195.440(c). The case was opened on 2012-07-12 and is reported as closed as of 2012-07-12. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

220126013W_warning letter_07122012.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220126013W/220126013W_warning%20letter_07122012.pdf

220126013W_warning letter_07122012_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220126013W/220126013W_warning%20letter_07122012_text.pdf

220126013W_warning letter_07122012_text.pdf

WARNING LETTER
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
July 12, 2012
Mr. James E. Mehring
Vice President OH/KY Gas Operations
Duke Energy Kentucky
139 East Fourth Street, Room EX403
Cincinnati, OH 45202
CPF 2-2012-6013W
Dear Mr. Mehring:
On April 16-20, 2012, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA), Southern Region, Office of Pipeline Safety, pursuant to Chapter
601 of 49 United States Code, inspected the Duke Energy Public Awareness Program (PAP)
in Kenton County, Kentucky, as it pertains to Duke Energy Kentucky (Duke).
As a result of the inspection, it appears that Duke has committed a probable violation of the
Pipeline Safety Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. The item inspected and
the probable violation is:
1. §195.440 Public awareness.
… (c) The operator must follow the general program recommendations, including
baseline and supplemental requirements of API RP 1162, unless the operator
provides justification in its program or procedural manual as to why compliance
with all or certain provisions of the recommended practice is not practicable and not
necessary for safety.
API RP 1162, Paragraph 6.3.1, The Affected Public, requires a pipeline operator to
consider extending the coverage area for the affected public for highly volatile liquid
(HVL) pipelines in high population areas beyond the 1/8th mile minimum distance on each
side of the pipeline. The Duke Energy Kentucky pipeline transports liquefied propane; an
HVL. While Duke’s PAP Section 9.2 mimics the API RP 1162 supplemental requirement
to extend the coverage area for the affected public for HVL pipelines beyond the 1/8th
mile minimum distance on each side of the pipeline, nowhere in the PAP did Duke
explain how they made such a consideration or how they justified such an extension was
not practical or not necessary for safety. Duke simply used a 700 ft. coverage area (see
Duke PAP Section 5.1) on each side of the pipeline (essentially 1/8th of a mile), regardless



of whether or not it transports HVLs, with no explanation whatsoever to justify this
coverage area.
Under 49 United States Code, § 60122, you are subject to a civil penalty not to exceed
$100,000 for each violation for each day the violation persists up to a maximum of
$1,000,000 for any related series of violations. We have reviewed the circumstances and
supporting documents involved in this case, and have decided not to conduct additional
enforcement action or penalty assessment proceedings at this time. We advise you to correct
the item identified in this letter. Failure to do so will result in Duke Energy Kentucky being
subject to additional enforcement action.
No reply to this letter is required. If you choose to reply, in your correspondence please refer
to CPF 2-2012-6013W. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this
enforcement action is subject to being made publicly available. If you believe that any
portion of your responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b),
along with the complete original document you must provide a second copy of the document
with the portions you believe qualify for confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of
why you believe the redacted information qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C.
552(b).
Sincerely,
Wayne T. Lemoi
Director, Office of Pipeline Safety
PHMSA Southern Region
2

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/220126013W>
- Source ID: `phmsa-enforcement`
- SHA-256: `438232447573db24d121752f84e5a5688027ae9d7f77c2a1835e68eadd8455c6`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T04:44:44.458Z
- Exported: 2026-08-24T21:01:02.373Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-enforcement-220126013w`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "cpf": "220126013W",
  "operator": "DUKE ENERGY KENTUCKY - LIQUID",
  "region": "Southern",
  "pipelineType": "INTRASTATE LIQUID ONSHORE",
  "caseStatus": "CLOSED",
  "citedSections": [
    "195.440(c)"
  ],
  "dataAsOf": "08/04/2026 12PM",
  "caseDataAsOf": "2026-08-04",
  "attachmentCount": 2,
  "attachments": [
    {
      "name": "220126013W_warning letter_07122012.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220126013W/220126013W_warning%20letter_07122012.pdf",
      "bytes": 144638,
      "category": "agency_document"
    },
    {
      "name": "220126013W_warning letter_07122012_text.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220126013W/220126013W_warning%20letter_07122012_text.pdf",
      "bytes": 20347,
      "category": "agency_document"
    }
  ],
  "extractedAgencyDocumentCount": 1,
  "attachmentPolicy": "Official attachment links are retained. Agency-issued documents may also include a verified local PDF and page-level text representation.",
  "jurisdiction": "US",
  "operatorName": "DUKE ENERGY KENTUCKY - LIQUID"
}
```
