# BOARDWALK PETROCHEMICAL PIPELINE, LLC — Notice of Probable Violation

**Citation:** CPF 420135019  
**Type / status:** enforcement / historical  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2013-09-25

CLOSED notice of probable violation citing 195.452(e)(1).

## Document text

Notice of Probable Violation involving BOARDWALK PETROCHEMICAL PIPELINE, LLC. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulation as 195.452(e)(1). The case was opened on 2013-09-25 and is reported as closed as of 2015-09-18. Proposed civil penalty: $33,100. Assessed civil penalty: $33,100. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

420135019_Closure_09182015.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_Closure_09182015.pdf

420135019_Closure_09182015_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_Closure_09182015_text.pdf

420135019_Final Order_10232014.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_Final%20Order_10232014.pdf

420135019_Final Order_10232014_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_Final%20Order_10232014_text.pdf

420135019_NOPV PCP PCO_09252013.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_NOPV%20PCP%20PCO_09252013.pdf

420135019_NOPV PCP PCO_09252013_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_NOPV%20PCP%20PCO_09252013_text.pdf

420135019_Operator Response to Notice_10292013.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_Operator%20Response%20to%20Notice_10292013.pdf

420135019_Final Order_10232014_text.pdf

OCTOBER 23, 2014
Mr. Al Williams
President
Chevron Pipe Line Company, LLC
4800 Fournace Place
Bellaire, TX 77401
Re: CPF No. 4-2013-5019
Dear Mr. Williams:
Enclosed please find the Final Order issued in the above-referenced case. It makes findings of
violation, assesses a civil penalty of $33,100, and specifies actions that need to be taken by
Chevron Pipe Line Company, LLC, to comply with the pipeline safety regulations. This is to
acknowledge receipt of payment of the full penalty amount, by wire transfer, dated
March 25, 2014. When the terms of the compliance order have been completed, as determined
by the Director, Southwest Region, this enforcement action will be closed. Service of the Final
Order by certified mail is deemed effective upon the date of mailing, or as otherwise provided
under 49 C.F.R. § 190.5.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey D. Wiese
Associate Administrator
for Pipeline Safety
Enclosure
cc: Mr. R. M. Seeley, Director, Southwest Region, OPS
Mr. James M. Barnum, General Manager, Operations-Transition, Chevron Pipe Line
Company, LLC, 4800 Fournace Place, Bellaire, Texas 77401
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED



U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590
__________________________________________
In the Matter of )
Chevron Pipe Line Company, LLC, ) CPF No. 4-2013-5019
)
)
)
Respondent. )
_________________________________________ )
FINAL ORDER
Between April 16 and June 14, 2013, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60117, a representative of the
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety
(OPS), conducted an on-site pipeline safety inspection of the facilities and records of Chevron
Pipe Line Company, LLC (Chevron or Respondent), at the company’s Evangeline Ethylene
Pipeline (Evangeline Pipeline) facilities in Houston, Texas. Chevron is an indirect, wholly-
owned subsidiary of Chevron Corporation. Chevron operates pipeline assets that transport crude
oil, refined petroleum products, liquefied petroleum gas, natural gas and chemicals throughout
the United States.1
As a result of the inspection, the Director, Southwest Region, OPS (Director), issued to
Respondent, by letter dated September 25, 2013, a Notice of Probable Violation, Proposed Civil
Penalty and Proposed Compliance Order (Notice). In accordance with 49 C.F.R. § 190.207, the
Notice proposed finding that Chevron had violated 49 C.F.R. § 195.452(e)(1), and proposed
assessing a civil penalty of $33,100 for the alleged violation. The Notice also proposed that
Respondent be required to take certain measures to correct the alleged violation.
Chevron responded to the Notice, by letter dated October 29, 2013 (Response). Respondent did
not contest the allegations of violation, but provided information concerning the corrective
actions it has taken to comply with the Proposed Compliance Order and paid proposed civil
penalty of $33,100, as provided in 49 C.F.R. § 190.227. Payment of the penalty will serve to
close the case with prejudice to Respondent.
FINDING OF VIOLATION
In its Response, Chevron, did not contest the allegation in the Notice that it violated 49 C.F.R.
Part 195, as follows:
1 See http://www.chevronpipeline.com/about/ (current as of June 10, 2014).



2
Item 1: The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 195.452(e)(1), which states:
§ 195.452 Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas.
(a) . . .
(e) What are the risk factors for establishing an assessment schedule
(for both the baseline and continual integrity assessments)? (1) An
operator must establish an integrity assessment schedule that prioritizes
pipeline segments for assessment (see paragraphs (d)(1) and (j)(3) of this
section). An operator must base the assessment schedule on all risk factors
that reflect the risk conditions on the pipeline segment. The factors an
operator must consider include, but are not limited to:
(i) Results of the previous integrity assessment, defect type and size
that the assessment method can detect, and defect growth rate;
(ii) Pipe size, material, manufacturing information, coating type and
condition, and seam type;
(iii) Leak history, repair history and cathodic protection history;
(iv) Product transported;
(v) Operating stress level;
(vi) Existing or projected activities in the area;
(vii) Local environmental factors that could affect the pipeline (e.g.,
corrosivity of soil, subsidence, climatic);
(viii) Geo-technical hazards; and
(ix) Physical support of the segment such as by a cable suspension
bridge.
The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 195.452(e)(1) by failing (1) to properly
consider and evaluate all the risks associated with the Evangeline Pipeline, and (2) to factor-in
the leak history of the Evangeline Pipeline when performing an integrity assessment for the
pipeline. Integrity Management is an important part of the safety protocol for operators of
pipelines, and provides assurance that operators are properly assessing the risks along particular
segments of pipeline and taking steps to mitigate those risks. Specifically, the Notice alleged
that Chevron did not properly consider all of the relevant risk factors in determining the
assessment schedule for the Evangeline Pipeline because it did not consider the line’s leak
history. As a result, Chevron did not select an internal inspection method capable of assessing
seam-integrity issues stemming from known risk factors.
The Notice further alleged that the Evangeline Pipeline is a 16-inch, .312/.314 wt.(wall
thickness), X52 LF (low frequency) electric-resistance welded pipe manufactured in 1953 at the
Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, NY. On May 10, 2012, in preparation for its 2012
reassessment, Chevron completed a review of: (1) its 2007 reassessment findings; and (2)
multiple reports of leaks on the Evangeline Pipeline from 2007 to 2012. Based on the review,
Chevron allegedly selected a geometry and magnetic flux leakage tool for its 2012 reassessment
method. However, the Evangeline Pipeline had two documented seam leaks in 2011, but those
leaks were not considered during the company’s assessment process. According to the Notice,
Chevron was aware that the Evangeline Pipeline had been manufactured before 1962 and was
susceptible to longitudinal seam failure but still failed to select an assessment tool or method
capable of assessing the long seam.



3
Respondent did not contest this allegation of violation. Accordingly, based upon a review of all
of the evidence, I find that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 195.452(e)(1) by (1) failing to
properly consider and evaluate all the risks associated with the Evangeline Pipeline, and (2)
failing to factor-in the leak history when performing an integrity assessment for the Evangeline
Pipeline.
This finding of violation will be considered a prior offense in any subsequent enforcement action
taken against Respondent.
ASSESSMENT OF PENALTY
Under 49 U.S.C. § 60122, Respondent is subject to an administrative civil penalty not to exceed
$200,000 per violation for each day of the violation, up to a maximum of $2,000,000 for any
related series of violations. In determining the amount of a civil penalty under 49 U.S.C.
§ 60122 and 49 C.F.R. § 190.225, I must consider the following criteria: the nature,
circumstances, and gravity of the violation, including adverse impact on the environment; the
degree of Respondent’s culpability; the history of Respondent’s prior offenses; and any effect
that the penalty may have on its ability to continue doing business; and the good faith of
Respondent in attempting to comply with the pipeline safety regulations. In addition, I may
consider the economic benefit gained from the violation without any reduction because of
subsequent damages, and such other matters as justice may require. The Notice proposed a total
civil penalty of $33,100 for the violation cited above.
Item 1: The Notice proposed a civil penalty of $33,100 for Respondent’s violation of 49 C.F.R.
§ 195.452(e)(1), for failing (1) to properly consider and evaluate all the risks associated with the
Evangeline Pipeline, and (2) failing to factor-in the leak history of the Evangeline Pipeline when
performing an integrity assessment of the line. Chevron neither contested the allegation nor
presented any evidence or argument justifying elimination or reduction of the proposed penalty.
Accordingly, having reviewed the record and considered the assessment criteria, I assess
Respondent a civil penalty of $33,100 for violation of 49 C.F.R. § 195.452(e)(1).
In summary, having reviewed the record and considered the assessment criteria for the Item cited
above, I assess Respondent a total civil penalty of $33,100 for violation of 49 C.F.R.
§ 195.452(e)(1), which has been paid in full.
COMPLIANCE ORDER
The Notice proposed a compliance order with respect to Item 1 in the Notice for violation of
49 C.F.R. § 195.452(e)(1). Under 49 U.S.C. § 60118(a), each person who engages in the
transportation of [gas] [hazardous liquids] or who owns or operates a pipeline facility is required
to comply with the applicable safety standards established under chapter 601. Pursuant to the
authority of 49 U.S.C. § 60118(b) and 49 C.F.R. § 190.217, Respondent is ordered to take the
following actions to ensure compliance with the pipeline safety regulations applicable to its
operations:



4
1. With respect to the violation of § 195.452(e)(1) (Item 1):
a. In regard to Item Number 1 of the Notice, pertaining to Chevron’s failure to
properly consider risks for the Evangeline Pipeline, Chevron must assess the
Evangeline Pipeline by a method prescribed in Appendix G of its Pipeline Integrity
Management Program Manual.
b. Chevron shall complete the assessment of the Evangeline Pipeline within 30 days of
receiving this Final Order.
c. It is requested (not mandated) that Chevron Pipe Line Company, LLC maintain
documentation of the safety improvement costs associated with fulfilling this
Compliance Order and submit the total to Mr. R.M. Seeley, Director, Southwest
Region, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. It is requested
that these costs be reported in two categories: 1) total cost associated with
preparation/revision of plans, procedures, studies and analyses; and 2) total cost
associated with replacements, additions and other changes to pipeline infrastructure.
The Director may grant an extension of time to comply with any of the required items upon a
written request timely submitted by the Respondent and demonstrating good cause for an
extension.
Failure to comply with this Order may result in the administrative assessment of civil penalties
not to exceed $200,000 for each violation for each day the violation continues or in referral to the
Attorney General for appropriate relief in a district court of the United States.
Under 49 C.F.R. § 190.215, Respondent has a right to submit a Petition for Reconsideration of
this Final Order. The petition must be sent to: Associate Administrator, Office of Pipeline
Safety, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, East Building, 2nd Floor, Washington, DC
20590, with a copy sent to the Office of Chief Counsel, PHMSA, at the same address. PHMSA
will accept petitions received no later than 20 days after receipt of service of this Final Order by
the Respondent, provided they contain a brief statement of the issue(s) and meet all other
requirements of 49 C.F.R. § 190.215. The filing of a petition automatically stays the payment of
any civil penalty assessed. Unless the Associate Administrator, upon request, grants a stay, all
other terms and conditions of this Final Order are effective upon service in accordance with
49 C.F.R. § 190.5.
___________________________________ __________________________
Jeffrey D. Wiese Date Issued
Associate Administrator
for Pipeline Safety

420135019_Closure_09182015_text.pdf

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
September 18, 2015
Mr. Randall Curry
President
Chevron Petrochemical Pipeline LLC
4800 Fournace Place
Bellaire, TX 77401
CPF 4-2013-5019
Dear Mr. Curry:
Between April 16 and June 14, 2013, representatives of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA) pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code inspected the
Chevron Petrochemical Pipeline LLC (Chevron) maintenance and integrity management records
for the Evangeline Ethylene Pipeline system in Houston, TX. As a result of the inspection,
Chevron was issued a Notice of Probable Violation (NOPV), Civil Penalty (CP), and Proposed
Compliance Order (PCO) on September 25, 2015.
Chevron submitted its response to the NOPV and PCO on October 29, 2013, but did not request
a hearing. The submittal was received in my office on October 31, 2014. On September 22 and
24, 2014, PHMSA Southwest Region visited Chevron’s office in Bellaire, TX to review hydro-
test records for the Evangeline. Based on PHMSA’s review of the of the hydro-test records, the
tests were not determined to be valid due to indications of unaccounted for pressure loss during
the test. Since Boardwalk’s acquisition of the Evangeline, a CAO (CPF 4-2014-5027H) was
issued requiring an Integrity Verification and Remediation Plan be developed.
This letter is to inform you no further action is necessary and this case is now closed.
Sincerely,
R. M. Seeley
Director, Southwest Region
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

420135019_NOPV PCP PCO_09252013_text.pdf

NOTICE OF PROBABLE VIOLATION
PROPOSED CIVIL PENALTY
and
PROPOSED COMPLIANCE ORDER
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
September 25, 2013
Mr. Randall Curry
President
Chevron Petrochemical Pipeline LLC
4800 Fournace Place
Bellaire, TX 77401
CPF 4-2013-5019
Dear Mr. Curry:
Between April 16 and June 14, 2013, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49
United States Code inspected your maintenance and integrity management records for the
Evangeline Ethylene Pipeline system in Houston, TX.
As a result of the inspection, it appears that you have committed a probable violation of the
Pipeline Safety Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. The item inspected and the
probable violation is:
1. § 195.452(e)(1) - Pipeline integrity management in high consequence areas.
(e) What are the risk factors for establishing an assessment schedule (for both the
baseline and continual integrity assessments)? (1) An operator must establish an
integrity assessment schedule that prioritizes pipeline segments for assessment (see
paragraphs (d)(1) and (j)(3) of this section). An operator must base the assessment



schedule on all risk factors that reflect the risk conditions on the pipeline segment. The
factors an operator must consider include, but are not limited to:
(i) Results of the previous integrity assessment, defect type and size that the
assessment method can detect, and defect growth rate;
(ii) Pipe size, material, manufacturing information, coating type and condition,
and seam type;
(iii) Leak history, repair history and cathodic protection history;
(iv) Product transported;
(v) Operating stress level;
(vi) Existing or projected activities in the area;
(vii) Local environmental factors that could affect the pipeline (e.g., corrosivity
of soil, subsidence, climatic),
(viii) geo-technical hazards; and
(ix) Physical support of the segment such as by a cable suspension bridge.
Chevron did not properly consider and evaluate all the risks in order to properly establish an
assessment schedule using an acceptable assessment method and did not use its leak history
when performing the evaluation. Chevron did not select an internal inspection tool capable of
assessing seam integrity issues based on known risk factors associated with the Evangeline
Ethylene Pipeline (Evangeline). The Evangeline is a 16”, .312/.314 wt., X52 LF (low frequency)
ERW (electric resistance welded) pipe manufactured in 1953 at the Youngstown Sheet and Tube
Company, NY.
On May 10, 2012, Chevron completed its review of the 2007 reassessment findings as well as
leaks found from 2007 through 2012. Based on their risk analysis, Chevron selected a geometry
and MFL tool for its 2012 reassessment method. The Evangeline had two seam related leaks in
2011; however Chevron failed to include that data in its risk analysis for the 2012 reassessment
method determination.
Chevron’s Pipeline Integrity Management Program Manual procedure for continual evaluation
and assessment, Section 3.3.1 – “Reassessment Intervals and Methods”, makes reference to
Appendix G, Integrity Assessment Process for Gas or Hazardous Liquids – Flowchart F1 and
Sheet F1.1. Appendix G contains numerous flowcharts which outline the process for
determining which ILI tool should be used for LF ERW pipe manufactured before 1962.
Knowing that the Evangeline was manufactured before 1962, and is susceptible to longitudinal
seam failure, the Evangeline should have been assessed in June 2012 by a tool capable of
assessing the long seam. If those tools were not available, then a hydro-test should have been
performed. This tool selection process is contained in Chevron’s assessment method
determination flowcharts A2, A3, A3.1, and A3.2.
2



Proposed Civil Penalty
Under 49 United States Code, § 60122, you are subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $200,000
per violation per day the violation persists up to a maximum of $2,000,000 for a related series of
violations. For violations occurring prior to January 4, 2012, the maximum penalty may not
exceed $100,000 per violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to exceed $1,000,000 for a
related series of violations. The Compliance Officer has reviewed the circumstances and
supporting documentation involved in the above probable violation(s) and has recommended that
you be preliminarily assessed a civil penalty of $33,100.
Proposed Compliance Order
With respect to item 1 pursuant to 49 United States Code § 60118, the Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration proposes to issue a Compliance Order to Chevron
Petrochemical Pipeline LLC. Please refer to the Proposed Compliance Order, which is enclosed
and made a part of this Notice.
Response to this Notice
Enclosed as part of this Notice is a document entitled Response Options for Pipeline Operators
in Compliance Proceedings. Please refer to this document and note the response options. All
material you submit in response to this enforcement action may be made publicly available. If
you believe that any portion of your responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment
under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), along with the complete original document you must provide a second
copy of the document with the portions you believe qualify for confidential treatment redacted
and an explanation of why you believe the redacted information qualifies for confidential
treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b). If you do not respond within 30 days of receipt of this Notice,
this constitutes a waiver of your right to contest the allegations in this Notice and authorizes the
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety to find facts as alleged in this Notice without further
notice to you and to issue a Final Order.
In your correspondence on this matter, please refer to CPF 4-2013-5019 and for each document
you submit, please provide a copy in electronic format whenever possible.
Sincerely,
R. M. Seeley
Director, Southwest Region
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Enclosures: Proposed Compliance Order
Response Options for Pipeline Operators in Compliance Proceedings
3



PROPOSED COMPLIANCE ORDER
Pursuant to 49 United States Code § 60118, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) proposes to issue to Chevron Petrochemical Pipeline LLC a
Compliance Order incorporating the following remedial requirements to ensure the compliance
of Chevron Petrochemical Pipeline LLC with the pipeline safety regulations:
1. 2. 3. In regard to Item Number 1 of the Notice pertaining to Chevron’s failure to
properly consider risks for the Evangeline Ethylene Pipeline. Chevron must
assess the Evangeline Pipeline by a method prescribed in Appendix G of its
Pipeline Integrity Management Program Manual.
Chevron shall complete the assessment of the Evangeline Pipeline within 30 days
of receiving the final order.
It is requested (not mandated) that Chevron Petrochemical Pipeline LLC
maintain documentation of the safety improvement costs associated with fulfilling
this Compliance Order and submit the total to Mr. R. M. Seeley, Director,
Southwest Region, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. It is
requested that these costs be reported in two categories: 1) total cost associated
with preparation/revision of plans, procedures, studies and analyses, and 2) total
cost associated with replacements, additions and other changes to pipeline
infrastructure.
4

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/420135019>
- Source ID: `phmsa-enforcement`
- SHA-256: `3b6acd8f05bcd5d892bbed258fc8a70c7f1ed804ef3254d345090aa847b4ac6d`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T04:44:44.458Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T13:17:52.494Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-enforcement-420135019`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "cpf": "420135019",
  "operator": "BOARDWALK PETROCHEMICAL PIPELINE, LLC",
  "region": "Southwest",
  "pipelineType": "INTERSTATE LIQUID ONSHORE",
  "caseStatus": "CLOSED",
  "citedSections": [
    "195.452(e)(1)"
  ],
  "dataAsOf": "08/04/2026 12PM",
  "caseDataAsOf": "2026-08-04",
  "attachmentCount": 7,
  "attachments": [
    {
      "name": "420135019_Closure_09182015.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_Closure_09182015.pdf",
      "bytes": 56433,
      "category": "agency_document"
    },
    {
      "name": "420135019_Closure_09182015_text.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_Closure_09182015_text.pdf",
      "bytes": 4901,
      "category": "agency_document"
    },
    {
      "name": "420135019_Final Order_10232014.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_Final%20Order_10232014.pdf",
      "bytes": 289624,
      "category": "agency_document"
    },
    {
      "name": "420135019_Final Order_10232014_text.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_Final%20Order_10232014_text.pdf",
      "bytes": 24278,
      "category": "agency_document"
    },
    {
      "name": "420135019_NOPV PCP PCO_09252013.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_NOPV%20PCP%20PCO_09252013.pdf",
      "bytes": 63530,
      "category": "agency_document"
    },
    {
      "name": "420135019_NOPV PCP PCO_09252013_text.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_NOPV%20PCP%20PCO_09252013_text.pdf",
      "bytes": 18654,
      "category": "agency_document"
    },
    {
      "name": "420135019_Operator Response to Notice_10292013.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/420135019/420135019_Operator%20Response%20to%20Notice_10292013.pdf",
      "bytes": 106566,
      "category": "party_submission"
    }
  ],
  "extractedAgencyDocumentCount": 3,
  "attachmentPolicy": "Official attachment links are retained. Agency-issued documents may also include a verified local PDF and page-level text representation.",
  "jurisdiction": "US",
  "operatorName": "BOARDWALK PETROCHEMICAL PIPELINE, LLC"
}
```
