# PHILLIPS 66 PIPELINE LLC — Warning Letter

**Citation:** CPF 52021050WL  
**Type / status:** enforcement / historical  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2021-10-12

CLOSED warning letter citing 195.110(b), 195.559(b), 195.559(c), 195.583(c).

## Document text

Warning Letter involving PHILLIPS 66 PIPELINE LLC. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 195.110(b),  195.559(b),  195.559(c),  195.583(c). The case was opened on 2021-10-12 and is reported as closed as of 2021-10-12. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

52021050WL_Warning Letter_10122021_(21-199945).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52021050WL/52021050WL_Warning%20Letter_10122021_(21-199945).pdf

52021050WL_Warning Letter_10122021_(21-199945)_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52021050WL/52021050WL_Warning%20Letter_10122021_(21-199945)_text.pdf

52021050WL_Warning Letter_10122021_(21-199945)_text.pdf

WARNING LETTER
VIA E-MAIL TO MR. TODD DENTON
October 12, 2021
Mr. Todd Denton
VP Midstream Operations
Phillips 66
2331 CityWest Boulevard, N812-03
Houston, TX 77042
CPF 5-2021-050-WL
Dear Mr. Denton:
From July 13 through 15, 2021, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA), pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code (U.S.C.), inspected
your Phillips 66 (P66) Denver Refined Products Terminal system in Commerce City, Colorado.
As a result of the inspection, it is alleged that you have committed probable violations of the
Pipeline Safety Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The items inspected
and the probable violations are:
1. §195.583 What must I do to monitor atmospheric corrosion control?
(a)…
(c) If you find atmospheric corrosion during an inspection, you must provide
protection against the corrosion as required by §195.581.
After finding atmospheric corrosion during inspection, P66 failed to provide protection against
corrosion as required by §195.581. Despite the prevalence of atmospheric corrosion on its line,



P66 failed to adequately clean and coat the pipeline pursuant to § 195.581(a).1 During the
inspection, PHMSA identified numerous areas of atmospheric corrosion on P66’s pipeline
including multiple instances of soil-to-air interface corrosion (e.g. pipe laying in the soil without
proper coating; this makes the pipe susceptible to corrosion more than either buried or
raised/unburied sections), excessive external corrosion with pitting, and excessive crevice
corrosion (e.g., where pipe meets the supports). See in the form of Exhibit 1.1 – 1.3 attached
hereto.
2. §195.559 What coating material may I use for external corrosion control?
Coating material for external corrosion control under § 195.557 must –
(a)…
(b) Have sufficient adhesion to the metal surface to prevent under film migration of
moisture;
(c) Be sufficiently ductile to resist cracking;
The P66 lines moving product between the Mainline and Breakout Tanks failed to have external
corrosion control coating material with sufficient adhesion to the metal surface to prevent under
film migration of moisture and was not sufficiently ductile to resist cracking. During the pipeline
field inspection, PHMSA identified multiple above-ground locations which had cracks, dis-
bonding, and coating damage. These deficiencies allow moisture to collect between the coating
and pipeline surface which can cause external corrosion and metal loss. See in the form of
Exhibit 2.1 – 2.2 attached hereto.
3. §195.110 External loads.
(a)…
(b) The pipe and other components must be supported in such a way that the
support does not cause excess localized stresses. In designing attachments to pipe,
the added stress to the wall of the pipe must be computed and compensated for.
P66 failed to have its pipe and other components supported in such a way that the support does
not cause excess localized stress. During the field inspection, PHMSA identified multiple pipe
supports that had support cushions missing, deteriorated, or improperly installed between the
mainline and breakout tanks. As a result, the pipeline is not properly supported and causes excess
localized stress. See in the form of Exhibit 3.1 – 3.3 attached hereto.
Under 49 U.S.C. § 60122 and 49 CFR § 190.223, you are subject to a civil penalty not to exceed
$225,134 per violation per day the violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,251,334 for a
related series of violations. For violation occurring on or after January 11, 2021 and before May
1 This does not fall within an exception in § 195.581(c) because this is not light surface oxide nor is it corrosion that otherwise
would not affect the safe operation of the pipeline before the next scheduled inspection. This corrosion impacts the safe operation
of the pipeline due to the pipeline’s age (approximately 70 years old), its location within a High Consequence Area, and its inability
to be assessed via in-line inspection.
2



3, 2021, the maximum penalty may not exceed $222,504 per violation per day the violation
persists, up to a maximum of $2,225,034 for a related series of violations. For violation
occurring on or after July 31, 2019 and before January 11, 2021, the maximum penalty may not
exceed $218,647 per violation per day the violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,186,465 for
a related series of violations. For violation occurring on or after November 27, 2018 and before
July 31, 2019, the maximum penalty may not exceed $213,268 per violation per day, with a
maximum penalty not to exceed $2,132,679. For violation occurring on or after November 2,
2015 and before November 27, 2018, the maximum penalty may not exceed $209,002 per
violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to exceed $2,090,022.
We have reviewed the circumstances and supporting documents involved in this case, and have
decided not to conduct additional enforcement action or penalty assessment proceedings at this
time. We advise you to correct the items identified in this letter. Failure to do so will result in
Phillips 66 being subject to additional enforcement action.
No reply to this letter is required. If you choose to reply, in your correspondence please refer to
CPF 5-2021-050-WL. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this enforcement
action is subject to being made publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your
responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b), along with the
complete original document you must provide a second copy of the document with the portions
you believe qualify for confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe
the redacted information qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b).
Sincerely,
Dustin Hubbard
Director, Western Region, Office of Pipeline Safety
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
cc: PHP-60 Compliance Registry
PHP-500 M. Buss, H. Flaherty (#21-199945)
Todd Fuksa, Compliance Director, Phillips 66
Jose Rodriguez, DOT Coordinator, Phillips 66
3

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/52021050WL>
- Source ID: `phmsa-enforcement`
- SHA-256: `61a5dee973f94648db33e2602415c6de61aee21b00d650833414662341a463ba`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T04:44:44.458Z
- Exported: 2026-08-24T21:52:18.922Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-enforcement-52021050wl`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "cpf": "52021050WL",
  "operator": "PHILLIPS 66 PIPELINE LLC",
  "region": "Western",
  "pipelineType": "INTERSTATE LIQUID",
  "caseStatus": "CLOSED",
  "citedSections": [
    "195.110(b)",
    "195.559(b)",
    "195.559(c)",
    "195.583(c)"
  ],
  "dataAsOf": "08/04/2026 12PM",
  "caseDataAsOf": "2026-08-04",
  "attachmentCount": 2,
  "attachments": [
    {
      "name": "52021050WL_Warning Letter_10122021_(21-199945).pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52021050WL/52021050WL_Warning%20Letter_10122021_(21-199945).pdf",
      "bytes": 235846,
      "category": "agency_document"
    },
    {
      "name": "52021050WL_Warning Letter_10122021_(21-199945)_text.pdf",
      "url": "https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/52021050WL/52021050WL_Warning%20Letter_10122021_(21-199945)_text.pdf",
      "bytes": 108550,
      "category": "agency_document"
    }
  ],
  "extractedAgencyDocumentCount": 1,
  "attachmentPolicy": "Official attachment links are retained. Agency-issued documents may also include a verified local PDF and page-level text representation.",
  "jurisdiction": "US",
  "operatorName": "PHILLIPS 66 PIPELINE LLC"
}
```
