# Chemical Products Group — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 00-0102  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2000-05-16

00-0102 response to Chemical Products Group concerning 173.227.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

Washington, D.C.
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
20590
Research and
Administrations
MAY 16 2000
Ms. Joyce Stratis
FMC Corporation
Ref. No: 00-0102
Chemical Products Group
1735 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Dear Ms. Stratis:
This is in response to your letter of April 12, 2000, requesting clarification on the packaging
requirements for materials poisonous by inhalation under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR;
49 CFR Parts 171-180).
The packaging requirements of § 173.227(b)(ii) state that the closure must be physically held in place
by any means capable of preventing back-off or loosening of the closure by impact or vibration during
transportation. You ask whether using a bead of silicone caulk around the bung closure meets the
provisions of § 173.227(b)(ii).
The means you have described for physically holding a bung closure in place is acceptable. I hope this
information is helpful.
Sincerely,
Delmer F. Billings
Chief, Standards Development
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
173.22, 166ii"
000102

<<<PAGE 2>>>

APR 12 '00 09:09 FR
IU 8120250b5012
r.02104
FMC Corporation
REVISED LETTER & REQUEST
FMIC
April 12, 2000
Mr. Edward T. Mazzullo
Director, Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Research and Special Programs Administration (DHM10)
U.S. Department of Transportation
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Washington, DC 20590-0001
RE: EMERGENCY REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION & GUIDANCE
- PENDING ENFORCEMENT ACTION
Dear Mr. Mazzullo:
We are requesting an interpretation of the intent of 49 CFR 173.227 (b)
(2) on an emergency basis. This involves drum shipments of PIH
materials. We are ceasing shipment of these drums until we are
compliant with DOT regulations and need direction to ensure that we
are following the intent of the regulations and that these shipments are not
interrupted for a lengthy period of time.
On April 4, 2000, Mr. Chris Michalski, Hazardous Materials Enforcement
Specialist visited the Nitro, WV plant of Great Lakes Chemical Corporation
(formerly FMC Corporation).
Although the facility in Nitro, WW is now owned by Great Lakes
Chemicals, FMC still owns the Phosphorus Trichloride (6.1 (8) - UN 1809
- PG I - Hazard Zone B) and Phosphorus Oxychloride ( 8 (6.1) - UN
1810 - PG |1 - Hazard Zone B) produced at the facility. Great Lakes acts
as a toller for FMC Corporation relative to these materials.
Mr. Michalski found the following issues with our 1A1 Steel drums (used
for Phosphorus Trichloride) and our 1H1 Plastic drums (used for
Phosphorus Oxychloride):

<<<PAGE 3>>>

APR 12 'Ø0 09:09 FR
TO 812023663012
P.03/Ø4
•
: The plant did not pussess the closure instructions from the drum
The plant was not using torque wrenches to tighten the drum bungs
manufacturer
• Questioned whether our cap seals were capable of holding an internal
pressure of 15 psig
• The bungs were not held in place by a positive means to prevent
backing off or loosening due to impact or vibration during transit
Our Plant is obtaining appropriate closure instructions from the
manufacturer, will use torque wrenches to the appropriate torque specified
by the manufacturer and is obtaining documentation from our cap seal
vendor that it is capable of withstanding an internal pressure of at least 15
psig, all per 49 CFR 173.227 (b) (2).
We are not certain, however, how to ensure that the closures are
physically held in place by any means capable of preventing back-off
or loosening of the closure by impact or vibration during
transportation. We contacted both drum manufacturers (Russell Stanley
and Republic Steel) as well as Rieke (fittings manufacturer) and they
could not provide us with an appropriate means of physically holding the
closures in place. We also contacted others in our industry and requested
their methods and they also could not provide us with options since they
were not physically holding closures in place.
In a previous request to the DOT for interpretation/guidance, we proposed
using tape as a means of physically holding the closures in place. We
have since revised our thinking. We feel that using a bead of silicone
caulk around the bung closure, which will then be subsequently covered
by the cap seal, will ensure that closures are physically held in place and
prevent back-off or loosening of these closures by either impact or
vibration in transit.
We also believe that by following the appropriate drum closure
instructions provided by the manufacturers, using torque wrenches to the
prescribed torque and ensuring the cap seals can withstand at least an
shipping these drums for many vears with no transportation incident
nternal pressure of 15 psig would ensure proper closure. We have beer
relative to these non-bulk shipments.
I respectfully request the DOT's guidance relative to the above situation.

<<<PAGE 4>>>

We wish to be in compliance and need this help as soon as possible to
avoid further delay of our shipments.
Very truly yours.
Manager, Hazardous Materials
FMC Corporation
1735 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
(215) 299-6265
** TOTAL PAGE.04 **

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2000/000102.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `d2b31a1a867c6bc285b0e0397d2b251d14e3741bd19478c5c7b3cc9add1a85f8`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-23T23:41:14.949Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-00-0102`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Chemical Products Group"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Ms. Joyce Stratis"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "00-0102"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2000-05-16"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    173
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/46281"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "173.227",
    "173.227(b)(ii)",
    "173.22"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/173227"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2000/000102.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2000/000102.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2000/000102.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/00-0102-92a0d7b2f3.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "b7a48c2b574484f4fa049b23c627a7726777f770e3fb72bf19f3a2a499171aca",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/00-0102-92a0d7b2f3.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "cd64634bea06c2e10451d7152d13b4a240f34dd0896940a54cd8c2917809525f",
      "pageCount": 4,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
