# Conoco Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 01-0114  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2001-06-07

01-0114 response to Conoco Inc. concerning 173.240.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

...
::
US. Department
Research and
of Transportation
Washington. D.C
400 Seventh Street, S.W
20590
pecial Program
Idministratiol
JUN 7 2001
Ms. Sheila B. Ryan
Ref. No. 01-0114
Conoco Inc.
P.O. Box 2197
Houston, TX 77252-2197
Dear Ms. Ryan:
This is in response to your May 2, 2001 letter concerning requirements for the use of non-DOT
specification bulk packagings under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-
180). Specifically, you ask if a non-DOT specification, sift-proof closed bulk bin is allowed for the
transportation of a Class 9 environmentally hazardous waste. In addition, you had several questions
concerning related issues.
Concerning your first question, it is important to note that the shipping name you reference is not
correct. The correct shipping description is "Waste, Environmentally hazardous substance, solid,
n.o.s., 9, UN 3077, PG III." Column 8C of the hazardous materials table in § 172.101 refers you to
§ 173.240 for bulk packaging options. A non-DOT specification, sift-proof closed bulk bin is
authorized to transport this material. Your additional questions are paraphrased and answered below:
Question 1: Are non-DOT specification bins authorized under § 173.240 also permissible for use in
intrastate transportation if the state does not have regulations covering the transportation of hazardous
materials in non-DOT specification bins?
Answer 1: Yes.
Question 2: Are non-DOT specification bins excepted from the HMR requirements?
Answer 2: No. Non-DOT specification bins must meet the general packaging requirements for bulk
packages in §§ 173.24 and 173.24b.
Question 3: July 2000 was the deadline for the transition period during which non-specification
packagings were allowed for intrastate transportation under § 173.8. Must these non-DOT
specification bins authorized for use under § 173.240 be tested and certified in order to be used for
either intrastate or interstate transportation of hazardous materials?
173,240
010114

<<<PAGE 2>>>

testing or certification.
Answer 3: No. A non-DOT specification bin may be used for certain low-hazard materials without any
I hope this satisfies your request.
Sincerel
John A
Transportation Regulations Specialist
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
• 36r vE

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Johnsen
conoco
173.240(c)
173 8
Sheila B. Ryan
P.O. Box 2197
Conoco Inc.
281.293.4261
Houston, TX 77252-2197
Applicability
281.293.4394, fax
01-0114
2 May 2001
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Research and Special Program Administration
400 7l Street, SW
U.S. Department of Transportation
Washington, D.C. 20590
SUBJECT: Use of Non-Specification Bins
Dear Sirs:
Conoco Inc. is using non-DOTspecification roll-off boxes to transport environmentally-hazardous waste, n.o.s.,
placarded to meet EPA-RCRA and DOT requirements, and transported via highway to a TSDF site out of state.
NA 3077, class 9 material. The boxes are lifted onto a truck bed, filled, covered, properly marked/labeled/
We believe the use of these non-DOT specification sift-proof, closed bulk bins is permissible under 49 CFR
173.240(c). Is this interpretation of the regulation correct?
We are also seeking additional clarification on other regulatory issues:
(1) Are non-DOT specification binds under § 173.204(c), such as these roll-off boxes, also permissible for use
have regulations covering the transportation of hazardous materials in non-DOT specification bins?
in intrastate transportation if the state wherein the shipment originates and within which it travels does not
(2) Are non-DOT specification bins exempt from all of the Hazardous Materials regulations?
(3) July 2000 was the deadline for a transition period during which non-specification packagings were allowed
for intrastate transportation under § 173.8. It is our understanding that UN packaging (or DOT-specified)
must now be used. Must these non-DOT specification bins be tested and certified in order to be used for
either intrastate or interstate transportation of hazardous material?
We look forward to a prompt response. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Yours truly,
Shiers. Ryan.
Coordinator, Safety & Regulatory Compliance

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2001/010114.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `e9233983f17cb19e2fc6a653ded5cb1d03338d136678e24dc6bf025a0c9350f4`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T11:51:42.398Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-01-0114`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Conoco Inc."
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Ms. Sheila B. Ryan"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "01-0114"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2001-06-07"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    173
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/53231"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "173.240",
    "172.101",
    "173.24",
    "173.24b",
    "173.8",
    "173.204(c)"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/173240"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2001/010114.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2001/010114.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2001/010114.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/01-0114-3cbb33cf19.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "2a3786e06b8d970575687085f6ecc5f8488291d16db00fddf2ea38b340dd9b33",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/01-0114-3cbb33cf19.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "7de2042aaab1cac7b14ed845fafcf273e27e92960f135630d0fe5fffe9692552",
      "pageCount": 3,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
