# gh Package & Product Testing and Consulting, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 02-0148  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2002-07-10

02-0148 response to gh Package & Product Testing and Consulting, Inc. concerning 178.603.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

•
U.S. Department
of Transportation
400 Seventh St., S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20590
Research and
Special Programs
Administration
JUL 1 0 2002
Mr. H. Perry Hock
Ref. No. 02-0148
gh Package & Product Testing and Consulting, Inc.
325 Commercial Drive
Fairfield, OH 45014
Dear Mr. Hock:
This is in response to your May 26, 2002 letter concerning UN specification packaging testing under
the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR, parts 171-180). Specifically, you request
clarification on the testing for UN 1A2 drum designed with and without a gasket between the lid and
the drum. You ask if the six required drops for the drop test in § 178.603 could be performed on the
drums and lids without the gasket, then perform three additional top diagonal drops on previously
untested drums with the lids containing the gasket. You would then certify the drum as not having a
gasket and the drum would also have an alternative closure with a gasket.
Steel drums with and without a gasket would be considered to be different packagings under
§ 178.601(c)(4) and § 178.601(g)(8). Thus, you would have to perform separate drop tests on the
two types of drums you wish to manufacture to UN specifications. In answer to your follow-up
question asking if closed head drums having alternate bung caps could be tested in the way you
proposed, if you meet the provisions of § 178.601(g)(5) (Variation 5), then only the requirements of
that section need apply. If your change in bung caps does not meet the requirements under Variation 5
then that package would be considered a different packaging under § 178.601(c)(4) and
§ 178.601(g)(8) and would require the full drop test in order to be a UN Specification packaging.
I hope this satisfies your request.
Sincerely
Delmer F. Billings
Chief, Standards Development
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 2>>>

May: 20-02 03:21P gh testing
513 870 0080
P.02
"!?
...
gh Package
/gh
& Product
22 or or rio Di
Phone 513) 870-0080
Fax (513) 870-0017
Testing and
o Consulting, Inc.
335 W. Melinda Lane
Phoenix, AZ 85027
Fax (623) 869-8003
Phone (623) B69-8008
May 26, 2002
Johnsen
To:
Mr. Edward T. Mazzullo
Director, Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
§178.603
U.S. DOT/RSPA (DHM-10)
Washington, DC 20590-0001
400 7t Street S.W.
Testino
12-018
From: Mr. H. Perry Hock
Bh Package & Product Testing and Company
Technical Director
325 Commercial Dr.
Fairfield, OH 45014
Subject: Non - Bulk Single pack testing pursuant to CFR 49, § 178,603 - Drop Test
Dear Mr. Mazzullo,
I have a question regarding CFR 49, §178.603 for non-bulk single packs. The question
pertades on type mily be tested. de druand be drope on tea is got chime al
three drums to be dropped on the weakest part not previously tested by the first drop.
The manufacturer wishes to have a 1A2 (open head steel drum) certified with and without a
gasket between the lid and the drum.
Can one perform the six required drops on the drums and lids without the gasket, and then
containing the gasket? The drum would then be certified as not having a gasket and the
perform three additional top diagonal drops on previoualy untested drums with the lids
drum would also have an alternate closure with a gasket.
This would save drum manufacturers great expense in not having redundant bottom or side
drops since the drura itself has not changed.
Along the same thought lines, would the same interpretation be made for closed head drums
having alternate bung caps?
I look forward to your response. If you need clarification or have questions regarding this
letter, please call me at 513.870.0080 × 103
Youre Truly,
gh Package & Product Testing and Consulting, Inc.
Technical Director
HPH/hph
Ed Mazzulla Letter 5-20-02

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2002/020148.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `5512d4c8d051a461d07a4e8b507e184e7f6209d40966bbb60e9181dc3fbae594`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-23T00:02:06.714Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-02-0148`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "gh Package & Product Testing and Consulting, Inc."
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "H. Perry Hock"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "02-0148"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2002-07-10"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    178
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/59776"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "178.603",
    "178.601(c)(4)"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/178603"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2002/020148.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2002/020148.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2002/020148.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/02-0148-19ea4827fd.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "52166e71779bf6ec21336111aa4f75754fe3e662901e1f08b2ee7ac91c5f5ed7",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/02-0148-19ea4827fd.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "0d74e0c5b21101508c1e21f20694e2dd138c9d1673da36a5e9e483537d6a472b",
      "pageCount": 2,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
