# G & C Kinney, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 05-0087  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2005-05-10

05-0087 response to G & C Kinney, Inc. concerning 180.205.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

of Transportation
U.S. Department
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20590
Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration
MAY 10 2005
Mr. Glen L. Kinney
Ref. No. 05-0087
306 Cutter Cove
G & C Kinney, Inc.
Stafford VA 22554
Dear Mr. Kinney:
This responds to your telephone conversation with Mr. Ryan Posten, Exemptions
Program Officer, Office of Hazardous Materials Exemptions and Approvals, requesting
clarification of the requirements under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49
CFR Parts 171-180) concerning calibration verification of equipment used for volumetric
expansicn tests for DOT specification cylinders. Specifically, you ask whether the
maximum pressure at which the verification test is being conducted (for example, 3,000
pounds) must be maintained at the final pressure for 30 seconds or whether the pressure
may be allowed to drop between 2 psi and 10 psi.
Overall, for any pressure test (calibration or production retest), the 30-second hold time
begins only when the cylinder has completed its expansion. If the cylinder pressure
the hold time must be restarted or the test would be considered invalid.
drops by any measurable amount (such as 2 psi) during the recorded 30-second hold time,
I hope this information is helpful. If you need additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact this office.
Sincerely,
Hattie L. Mitchell
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
180.205
050087

<<<PAGE 2>>>

G & C KINNEY, INC.
306 Cutter Cove, Stafford VA 22554
Phone: (540) 659-3701
Fax: (540) 659-0017
E-Mail: gandckinney@aol.com
April 4, 2005
MCIntyre
US Department of Transportation
§180.205
Regulatory Review and Reinvention
Research and Special Programs Administration
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Cylinders
05-0087
Washington DC 20590
Attn: Hattie L. Mitchell
Dear Ms. Mitchell:
This is a request for interpretation of CFR 49 part 180.205 (g), (3), (4) and (5) with reference
calibration verification of the test equipment used for volumetric expansion tests of DOT pressure
cylinders.
Operators of DOT facilities that use computerized hydrostatic testing equipment have stated the
following: During system calibration verification (required by CFR 49 Part 180 (g) (3), (40, and (50)
while pressurizing the calibrated cylinder to the maximum pressure to be tested the maximum pressure
should be exceeded by 10 PSI to allow for some leakage that may take place at that pressure. In other
words, if the desired verification pressure is 3000 pounds the calibrated cylinder should be pressurized
to 3010 pounds and if the pressure does not fall below 3000 pounds, during the 30 seconds hold time
required by CFR 180.205 (g) (5), the test is considered acceptable.
In reviewing the written instructions furnished with the equipment I have not been able to find any
reference to such a procedure. In telephone conversations with the manufacturers, I have been
informed that these systems can not be manufactured to be totally leak proof at the higher pressures
and that these minute leaks will not show up in the older systems (burettes and weight bowl systems).
Part 180.205 (g) (5) States; Minimum test pressure must be maintained for at least 30 seconds and as
long as necessary for complete expansion of the cylinder.
Question: Does this section of part 180.205 (g) (5) apply to the calibration verification portion
being conducted at (i.e. 3000lbs) be maintained at that final pressure (i.e. 3000 lbs.) for 30 seconds o
180.205 (g) (3) and (4)) of the rule? By that I mean, must the maximum pressure the verification is
can it be allowed to drop between 2 and 10 PSI and still be considered acceptable for verification?
Sincerely,
Elen
I. Keeney
Glen L. Kinney
President

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050087.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `68323f301b8567fa3f68dc81383151c09978b97da8499c5b6868ca331c191909`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-23T17:25:21.162Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-05-0087`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "G & C Kinney, Inc."
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Glen L. Kinney"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "05-0087"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2005-05-10"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    180
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/56236"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "180.205"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/180205"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050087.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050087.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050087.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/05-0087-67fff5db02.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "af56061aef20b19e81f8ff5e4a01d38b7a75ffaa50d56dd095dfb20a788fa195",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/05-0087-67fff5db02.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "d693c638f0e472c94dea940bc09a5c099fdf00a952f0156b87c69faea0c34747",
      "pageCount": 2,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
