# Oak Ridge National Laboratory — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 05-0093  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2005-05-18

05-0093 response to Oak Ridge National Laboratory concerning 173.465, 173.467.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Washington, D.C. 20590
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Pipeline and
Administration
Hazardous Materials Safety
MAY 18 2005
Mr. Mark Hawk
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Ref No.: 05-0093
National Transportation Research Center, Rm. A14
2360 Cherahala Blvd
Knoxvile, TN 37932
Dear Mr. Hawk:
This responds to your June 4, 2004 letter and previous email correspondence with Jim
Williams, Health Physicist, Office of Hazardous Materials Technology (DHM-20)
requestirig clarification of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts
171-1801. Specifically, you ask for assistance in determining when the drop test
specified in § 173.465(c) and the hypothetical accident condition test specified in
§ 173.467 are required for packages intended for Type A quantities of fissile, radioactive
material (RAM). You request clarification of the regulations in effect prior to the final
rule published on January 26",
", 2004 under Docket No. RSPA-99-6283 (HM-230),
which became effective October 1, 2004. In your letter, you incorporated a list of
conclusions that were based on your understanding of the testing requirements in
§§ 173.455 (c) and 173.467 as they apply to fissile material packages authorized for use
by § 173.417(a). The list of conclusions you provided in your letter has been
summarized and revised below to accurately reflect the requirements of the HMR in
effect prior to October 1, 2004:
49 CFR 173.417(a)(1) - For a DOT Specification 6L:
The free drop test specified in § 173.465(c) does not apply.
49 CFR 173.417(a)(2) - For a DOT Specification 6M:
The free drop test specified in § 173.465(c) does not apply.
meet the mila rop est requirements for isle materi spent eackage must
§ 173.465(c)(2).
•
143. 465 C)e)
050093
173.467

<<<PAGE 2>>>

49 CFR 173.417(a)(5) - For any other Type A or Type B, Type B(U), or Type
B(M) packaging that are foreign made and for which the US Competent
The free drop test specified in § 173.465(c) does not apply. However, these
Authority has revalidated the foreign competent authority certificate:
applicable requirements of the International Atomic Energy Agency "Regulations
packagings must comply with the requirements of the country of origin and
(incorporated by reference, see § 171.7).
for the Safe Transport of Radioactive Materials, Safety Series No. 6,"
applicable packaging testing requirements of Part 178, Subpart M at the
49 CFR 173.417(a)(6) - For a 55-gallon 1A2 steel drum, meeting the
packing group i performance level; and meeting the eight (8) conditions of
appropriate primary, inner containment meeting the Type A provisions of
§ 173.417(a)(6), including 49 CFR 173.417(a)(6)(v) that requires an
49 CFR 178.350:
The Type A inner packaging must satisfy the requirements of the free drop test
specified in § 173.465(c)(2).
specified in § 173.465(c) and the initial drop test requirements for fissile material
Section 173.467 requires packaging for fissile material to meet the hypothetical accident
condition test requirements prescribed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in
10 CFR part 71. The applicability of the hypothetical accident condition test to the
packagings listed above must be determined in accordance with 10 CFR part 71.
Requests for guidance on 10 CFR part 71 should be addressed to the NR.C.
Note that, the DOT specification 6L, 6M and 1A2 packagings referenced in this letter are
only authorized to be used for fissile material through October 1, 2008 (§ 173.417).
Also, in your letter you state that §§ 173.465(c)(3) and and (c)(4) allow the use of separate
specimens for the corner drop test. That statement is incorrect. The regulations actually
require tnat you "must" use separate specimens for the corner drop test specified in
§§ 173.465 (c)(3) and (c)(4).
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if you require additional assistance.
Sincerely,
John A Gal
Chief, Standards Development
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Page 1 of 2
Williams, James <PHMSA>
From: Hawk, Mark B. [hawkmb@ornl.gov]
Sent:
Thursday, April 14,20054:16 PM
Erchenlaub
To:
Williams, James <PHMSA>
Subject: FW: Fissile Drop Testing for Type A Quantities of RAM
$173.465 (J€)
3/73.467
-----Original Message-----
OF tings
From: Hawk, Mark B.
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 8:51 AM
To: "james.williarn@rspa.dot.gov'
Subject: FW: Fissile Drop Testing for Type A Quantities of RAM
Jim:
Type A quantities of fissile, radioactive material (RAM), and the difference between the NRC requirements and
Thanks for your assistance in determining when the fissile drop testing of 49 CFR 173.465(c)(2) is required for
are any inaccuracies in my summary.
DOT requirements. Below is my summary of our discussions concerning this matter. Please let me know if there
Originally I contacted you to determine when the DOT 49 CFR 173.465(c)(2) fissile drop testing is required for
per 10 CFR 71.71 (c)(8), called a "Corner drop", is not consistent with the DOT Type A packaging tests described
packagings with Type A quantities of fissile RAM. During our discussions, it appeared that the NRC requirement
concluded that the DOT 49CFR173.465(c)(2) fissile drop testing is a precondition test that is performed prior to
in 49 CFR 173.465(c)(2). You contacted NRC to determine their opinion. The results of your discussion with NRC
condition tests of 10 CFR 71.71(c) "Conditions and tests" and the sequencing of this test is not addressed.
the normal free drop test of 49 CFR 173.465(c)(1). The 10 CFR 71.71(c)(8) "Corner drop" is one of the normal
or fissile material rectangular packages not exceeding 50 kg (110 lbs.), and fiberboard, wood, or fissile material
In addition, the NRC 10 CFR 71.71(c)(8) "Corner drop" is limited to, or only applies to, specific fiberboard, wood,
fissile packages (i.e., 55-gallon, steel drums). DOT 49 CFR 173.465(c)(3) and (4) does allow for separate
cylindrical packages not exceeding 100 kg (220 Ibs). Where as, the DOT 49 CFR 173.465(c)(2) test applies to all
100 kg (220 Ibs) or less.
rectangular packages with a mass of 50 kg (110 Ibs.) or less, or cylindrical fiberboard packages with a mass of
(c)(8) "Corner drop", we can use the list of "Authorized fissile materials packages" for Type A quantities of fissile
In determining when the DOT 49 CFR 173.465(c)(2) fissile drop testing is required versus the NRC 10 CFR 71.71
materials per DOT 49 CFR 173.417(a). It is my understanding that the following is appropriate as addressed in
the current regulations (not HM-230):
• 49 CFR 173.417(a)(1) - For a DOT Specification 6L - neither test is applicable as the DOT Specification
6L can be used "as is" for Type A quantifies of fissile RAM
• 49 CFR 173.417(a)(2) - For a DOT Specification 6M - neither test is applicable as the DOT Specification
6M can be used "as is" for Type A quantifies of fissile RAM
approval process and package testing requirements of 10 CFR71 Subparts E and F, respectively. (No
hypothetical accident tests need to be performed.)
• 49 CFR 173.417(a)(4) - For any other Type A or Type B, Type B(U), or Type B(M) packaging for fissile
Class 7 (radioactive) materials that also meets the applicable standards for fissile materials in 10 CFR Part
4/14/2005

<<<PAGE 4>>>

Page 2 of 2
packaging approval process and package testing requirements of 10 CFR 71 Subparts E and F,
71, the NRC 10 CFR 71.71(c)(8) "Corner drop" would apply as these packages are subject to the
respectively. (Both the normal condition and hypothetical tests need to be performed.)
• 49 CFR 173.417(a)(5) - For any other Type A or Type B, Type B(U), or Type B(M) packaging that are
foreign made and for which the US Competent Authority has revalidated the foreign competent authority
certificate, neither DOT or NRC test is applicable.
• 49 CFR 173.417(a)(6) - For a 55-gallon 1A2 steel drum meeting the eight (8) provisions of this section,
Type A provisions of 49 CFR 178.350, the DOT 49 CFR 173.465(c)(2) fissile drops apply only to the inner
including 49 CFR 173.417(a)(6)(v) that requires an appropriate primary, inner containment meeting the
Type A packages. (No hypothetical accident tests need to be performed.)
please advise accordingly.
I appreciate your persistence in obtaining this information. If any corrections to the above need to be made,
Sincerely!
Mark Hawk
Phone: 865-946-1275
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Fax:
865-946-1279
4/14/2005

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050093.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `5920aeb069fb33a6e1e2d2c73f1a34a6c5c35cbc82b34d173efc23c36a919cf8`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T11:41:16.466Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-05-0093`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Oak Ridge National Laboratory"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Mark Hawk"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "05-0093"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2005-05-18"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    173
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 2,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/55676"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "173.465",
    "173.465(c)",
    "173.467",
    "173.455",
    "173.417(a)",
    "171.7",
    "178.350"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/173465",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/173467"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050093.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050093.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050093.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/05-0093-5954efb6ac.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "1c407ef2892b6b290326e559959094a2ad466aa38fa0e2198a8424ab5b716aa5",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/05-0093-5954efb6ac.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "6ce96790619d7b1a1ede0897c5982c939cfcb8b9e21e8b86652dbb81ae505b65",
      "pageCount": 4,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
