# Ropak Packaging, West Division — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 05-0095  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2005-11-25

05-0095 response to Ropak Packaging, West Division concerning 178.601.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

of Transportation
U.S. Department
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20590
Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
VOV 25 2009
Administratior
Mr. Terry Iker
Reference No. 05-0095
Ropak Packaging, West Division
Manager, Technical Services
14585 Industry Circle
La Mirada, CA 90638
Dear Mr. Iker:
This is in response to your letter asking for clarification of periodic packaging resting
under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically,
you ask if non-bulk packagings selected at random by the manufacturer for periodic
retesting must be less than one year old.
The periodic retest requirements prescribed in § 178.601(c)(2), (e), and (f) do not specify
the age of the non-bulk packagings to be tested. They are designed to serve as a quality
control measure to ensure that all non-bulk, hazardous materials packagings
manufactured since the last successful design qualification test or periodic retest, as
applicable, are capable of meeting the appropriate UN performance standards. This can
only be successfully demonstrated if the packagings sel cted for testing are those
manufactured since the last successful performance test for that design by that
manufacturer. Therefore, after the design qualification tests required under
§ 178.601(c)(1) are successfully completed for each new or different packaging at the
start of production, subsequent productions of the approved packaging design must be
periodically retested as prescribed in § 178.601(c)(2), (e), and (f). As stated in
§ 178.601(e), a single or composite packaging must be periodically retested once every
12 months, and a combination packaging must be periodically retested once every 24
months. We believe this testing frequency and method . e sufficient to ensure that all
UN packagings are capable of passing the prescribed tests. Please note that a test report
nust be completed for each packaging design qualification test and each periodic retes
is prescribed in § 178.601(1)
I hope this information is helpful.
Sincerely,
totte z. Mithel
Hattie L. Mitchell, Chief
Office of Hazardous Materials Standard:
Regulatory Review and Reinventior
178.601 C)e)f)
050095

<<<PAGE 2>>>

LON
Edmonson
RA
C
Ropak Packaging
Testring
14585 Industry Circle, La Mirada, California 90638
West Division
05-0095
Tel: (714) 522-6891
Fax: (714) 522-4531
ISO 9002 Certified Quality System
March 10, 2005
U.S. DOT/PHMSA
400 7* Street S-W
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Washington DC, 20590
Attn: Mr. Edward Mazzullo
were older than one year old. Section 178.601 (c), (e) and (f).
Ref: Letter of Interpretation - Samples used for Periodic Retest of a single package,
Dear Mr. Mazzullo
Is there a requirement for random samples submitted for Periodic Retesting of a
single package, to be of a certain age? e.g. samples must have been manufactured in
the preceding year leading up to the renewal of the Periodic Retest.
Section 178.601 (c), (e) and (f) does not appear to specify that random samples submitted for
interval. However, there is a requirement that the subject samples must be capable of passing
Periodic Retest must have been manufactured during the year of the most recent Periodic Retest
the original design qualification tests.
Please provide an "official" interpretation for my records on this issue. If you have any additional
questions, please feel free to contact me at (714) 522-6891, xt 314.
Sincerely
Very kn
Terry Iker
Ropak Packaging
Manager, Technical Services

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050095.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `c9f27b0cd2634c71e32f37c4b7f6cc0c0c209e83d3b08cc63c2662f2a9e339d2`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T22:27:46.487Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-05-0095`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Ropak Packaging, West Division"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Terry Iker"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "05-0095"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2005-11-25"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    178
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/55811"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "178.601",
    "178.601(c)(2)"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/178601"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050095.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050095.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050095.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/05-0095-ade26bc951.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "03e449a987a14323399794842796f5c06468b57e79ad7d3b2c03304c509abec4",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/05-0095-ade26bc951.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "65f963b5514983e97490bdb60a0832c9e04d4a7d8df40d82572caa789d9cb326",
      "pageCount": 2,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
