# Galls/Aramark Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 05-0290  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2006-03-24

05-0290 response to Galls/Aramark Inc. concerning 171.1.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Washington, D.C. 20590
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Pipeline and
Administration
Hazarcious Materials Safety
MAR 24 2006
Mr. Carl Jackson
Ref. No. 05-0290
2680 Palumbo Drive
Galls/Aramark Inc.
P.O. Box 54308
Lexington, KY 40555-4308
Dear Mr. Jackson:
This is in response to your October 31, 2005 letter requesting clarification of the
applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) to a
freight forwarder who processes international shipments of hazardous materials.
Specifically, you ask whether responsibility for compliance with the HMR transfers from
the original offeror to the freight forwarder when the shipment is processed by the freight
forwarder for international transportation. If not, you ask whether a written agreement
between the original offeror and the freight forwarder could relieve the original offeror
from its responsibility for compliance with the HMR.
Your question pertains to the following scenario: The original offeror prepares and offers
for transportation a shipment of hazardous material classified as Consumer commodity,
ORM-D. The shipment is routed through a freight forwarder, who prepares and offers
the shipment for international transportation.
Under the HMR, any person who performs a "pre-transportation function" (see definition
in § 171.8) is an offeror of hazardous material. Pre-transportation functions are functions
performed to prepare a shipment for transportation, including assigning a hazard class to
a material, selecting a packaging for the material, filling and closing the packaging,
marking and labeling the packaging, and preparing shipping documentation and
emergency response information to accompany the shipment. There may be more than
one offeror of a shipment of hazardous materials. Each offeror is responsible for
complying with the requirements of the HMR, with respect to any pre-transportation
function that it performs or is required to perform; however, each offeror is responsible
only for the specific pre-transportation functions that it performs or is required to
perform, and each offeror may rely on information provided by another offeror, unless
that offeror knows or, a reasonable person, acting in the circumstances and exercising
reasonable care, would have knowledge that the information provided by the other
offeror is incorrect.
Your scenario has two parts. For the first part of transportation, the original offeror is
responsible for compliance with requirements applicable to the shipment of consumer
17/./
050290

<<<PAGE 2>>>

commodities under the HMR. For the second part of transportation, both the original
offeror and the freight forwarder are responsible for the pre-transportation functions they
perform. For example, if the original offeror prepares the package in the manner to be
forwarded to its international destination by the freight forwarder, the original offeror is
responsible for compliance with package selection, filling and closure requirements, and
package marking and labeling The freight forwarder will be responsible for compliance
with packaging requirements if it alters the packaging, places the material in a different
packaging, or has reason to believe that the original package (including its markings and
labels) is not in compliance with the HMR. If the freight forwarder performs all the
required pre-transportation functions applicable to the international portion of
transportation - including classifying the material, selecting and filling a packaging,
preparing a shipping document, supplying emergency response information, and marking
and labeling the package - then the freight forwarder would be solely responsible for
assuring the shipment complies with applicable requirements.
Unless the freight forwarder is handling the hazardous materials shipment without relying
on information provided by the original offeror, a written agreement to transfer
responsibility from the original offeror to the freight forwarder does not relieve the
original offeror from its responsibility for the shipment. In your scenario, it appears that
the freight forwarder is relying on information you provide to process the shipment for
international transportation. If so, you are responsible for the accuracy of the information
you provide as well as the requirements applicable to the functions you perform relative
to that shipment.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if you require additional assistance.
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Eichenlaub
5191. 1
Applicability
05-0290
INCORPORATIED
GALLS
October 31. 2005
AN ARAMARK COMPANY
Director
Office of the Standards
P.O. Box 54308
2680 Palumbo Drive
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Lexington, KY 40555-4308
100 Seventh Street, 8 Floor
J.S. Department of Transportatior
fax: 1-800-944-2557
phone: 1-800-477-7766
Washington, DC 20590
www.galls.com
Office of the Chief Counsel
Anil K. Mehta, Attorney
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Washington, DC 20590
U.S. Department of Transportation
Dear Sir or Madam:
under any circumstances, ship hazardous material via air. In addition, when we ship hazardous
Our current company policy mandates ground shipment only for all Hazardous Material. We do not,
material it is classified as ORM-D Consumer Commodities. The dilemma with our policy occurs when
we ship internationally.
responsible for regulation compliance of the hazardous material from origin to destination. Because
As addressed in a previous phone conversation with the Chief Council, we as the shipper are
our international shipments are processed by a Freight Forwarder, we assumed that compliance
passed to them. We have since learned that this is not the case. We then asked if we could request or
submit to the freight forwarder a written agreement that ensures all regulation compliance measures
are perfor aid this may cage the regal protein betrate cale bored desire.,
compliance regulations; thereby not being released from our liability for the package or its repackaging
of the product for shipment.
Even with this verbal interpretation we still request a written interpretation allowing its use as a guideline
request to Freight Forwarders for documentation from them confirming strict adherence to regulation
for our policy determination. Written confirmation would provide us with justifiable cause to present our
compliance.
Your written statement to this request would be greatly appreciated. Once we have received a written
statement we will be in a position to finalize company policy.
Respectfully,
Carl Jackson
Hazardous Material/Export Compliance Specialist
Galls/Aramark inc.
The Authority ir: Public Safety Equipment and Apparel

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050290.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `8a776ca53f53d2d372fea58a97f55c246b4100ed4ffda52ef5195a5ef1fd0ccd`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T22:27:46.791Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-05-0290`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Galls/Aramark Inc."
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Carl Jackson"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "05-0290"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2006-03-24"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    171
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/65846"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "171.1",
    "171.8"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/1711"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050290.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050290.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050290.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/05-0290-9ec4530816.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "a13d9470f23b32711f296e1d061c92eaea023b49a8beb4a60713222570132a5d",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/05-0290-9ec4530816.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "06bd95710148c923df56a5d69281ab78eda96f58029ed1177d3e7a7ef5a7c1b9",
      "pageCount": 3,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
