# AMCOM, U.S. Army Garrison — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 05-0309  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2006-06-23

05-0309 response to AMCOM, U.S. Army Garrison concerning 172.504, 172.516.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

JUN 2 3 2006
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20590
ipeline anc
laministratinterials Safet
Mr. Richard E. Eads
Reference No. 05-0309
Ammunition Surveillance (QASAS)
Quality Assurance Specialist
AMCOM, U.S. Army Garrison
Redstone Arsenal, Al 35898-5000
Dear Mr. Eads:
This is in response to your letter requesting clarification on the correct display of placards
on the front of a tractor-trailer motor vehicle under the Hazardous Materials Regulations
(HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you ask if the placard must appear on the
the delay in responding and any inconvenience this may have caused.
front of the truck's tractor or if it may appear on the front of its trailer. We apologize for
When placarding is required by § 172.504(a) of the HMR, a transport vehicle must be
placarded on each side and each end. The HMR require a placard to be clearly visible
it is coupled (see § 172.516(a)). For purposes of the HMR, a "transport vehicle" is a
from the direction it faces, except from the direction of another transport vehicle to which
cargo-carrying vehicle, such as a van, tractor, trailer, semi-trailer, tank car, or rail car
used for the transportation of cargo by any mode. Each cargo-carrying body is a separate
transport vehicle. Thus, in the example you cite of a truck tractor with a flatbed trailer, a
placard is not required on the front of the truck tractor if the flatbed trailer is placarded on
each side and each end, even if the placard on the front of the flatbed trailer is not visible.
We appreciate your concern that the exception in § 172.516 could have implications for
emergency responders at an accident scene. We considered this issue, that is the
visibility of the front placard on the trailer being obscured by the attached tractor, in an
advance notice of proposed rulemaking published under Docket No. HM-206 (57 FR
stating revisions to the placard visibility requirements were not necessary, we proposed
24532, June 9, 1992). Based on the comments received in response to the ANPRM
no revisions in the notice of proposed rulemaking (Docket No. HM-206, 59 FR. 41848,
August 15, 1994).
Sincerely
Hille z mite hel
Hattie L. Mitchell, Chief
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Regulatory Review and Reinvention
172.504
172.516
050309

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Edmonson
8172-516
§172.504
IMSE-RED-LGS-A
Placaraint
01 December 2005
15-0300
MEMORANDUM FOR Office of Hazardous Materials Standards, Research and
Special Programs Administration
SUBJECT: Interpretation of Part 172.504 and 172.516 of 49 CFR
a. Request that Parts 172.504 and 172.516 of 49 CFR be made clearer to the
layman, specifically regarding placarding of transport vehicles and the ability of the
›lacards to be seen in traffic and by first responders from all directions
2. Proposed language amendment to:
a. Subpart 172.504 (a)
(1). General. Except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, each
bulk packaging, freight container, unit load device, transport vehicle
or rail car containing any quantity of a hazardous material must be
specified in Tables 1 and 2 of this section and in accordance with
placarded on each side and each end with the type of placards
specifications for the placards named in the tables and described in
other placarding requirements of this subpart, including the
detail in subpart 172.519 through 172.560. The placards must be
placed so that they are visible from all directions while in transit.
b. Subpart 172.516 (b)
(1). The required placarding of the front of a motor vehicle may be on
the front of a truck-tractor instead of or in addition to the placarding
Placarding done to the front of the cargo body must be visible to
on the front of the cargo body to which the truck-tractor is attached.
the front of the truck-tractor (to which the cargo body is attached),
oncoming traffic, particularly first responders. If it is not visible from
the truck-tractor must be placarded.
3. My interest in this stems from my 23 years of work and training in the field of
HAZMAT shipments. I am required to be recertified every 2 years to be able to
ship HAZMAT by all modes of transportation world wide. In the 23 years I have
personally been involved in this process I have never heard or seen anything like
what took place here at Redstone Arsenal this week. We had a truck-tractor with a
flatbed loaded with 1.1 explosive items about to leave our area to head to the West
Coast. I arrived at the location of the truck-tractor and noticed that I didn't see any
told me he wasn't going to put one
explosive placard posted to the front of the vehicle. I spoke with the driver and he

<<<PAGE 3>>>

IMSE-RED-LGS-A
01 December 2005
on the front because he had one on the front of the trailer. I informed him that it was
required to be on the front of the truck-tractor since the one on the front of the trailer
was not visible. He proceeded to tell me I was wrong and I needed to call his HAZMAT
Trainer. After speaking with his trainer who also informed me I was wrong and that he
las been teaching this way of placarding for his company for over 12 years. That is hov
experts at the DOT then we need to make it clearer.
numerous installations worldwide dealing with the transport of HAZMAT and this is the
and training. I can say that I have never had this problem arise before. I have worked at
5. No additional cost will be involved to anyone in this proposed action if implemented
6. No environmental impacts are involved in this proposal.
7. POC is Richard Eads, QASAS, phone (256) 842-9086
RICHARD E EADS
Ammunition Surveillance (QASAS)
Quality Assurance Specialist
GS-1910-11
Garrison- Redstone Arsenal

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050309.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `7f59683297aa03a877e99ec9a44a595208f205940cb7717cd14df1239e40ae58`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-23T07:49:13.893Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-05-0309`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "AMCOM, U.S. Army Garrison"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Richard E. Eads"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "05-0309"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2006-06-23"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    172
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 2,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/44546"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "172.504",
    "172.504(a)",
    "172.516",
    "172.516(a)",
    "172.519",
    "172.560"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/172504",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/172516"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050309.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050309.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2005/050309.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/05-0309-3c3b2f349a.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "97679f25ff34c21ff2c229f53129317f5aed3fabbb0a7f21c8139f58dc932a7d",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/05-0309-3c3b2f349a.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "baa930f9741e2002fad4e8b6c806e950e39f91daaa6e2c6d58563b9e0281e2f4",
      "pageCount": 3,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
