# RBC Dam Rauscher — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 06-0113  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2006-07-27

06-0113 response to RBC Dam Rauscher concerning 171.1.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

S. Departmer
f Transportatic
Washington, D.C. 20590
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
peline an
azardous Materials safel
JUL 27 2006
RBC Dain Rauscher
Mr. Jay Jensen
Ref. No. C6-0113
299 South Main
Suite 2000
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Dear Mr. Jensen:
member of my staff requesting clarification of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49
This is in response to your May 12, 2006 letter and subsequent telephone conversation with a
motor vehicle within the boundaries of a privately owned industrial park. You provide the
CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you ask if the HMR apply to the transportation of jet fuel by
following scenario:
The fuel truck and the jet fuel are owned by Gas Busters Social Club, LLC. Gas Busters Social
Club, LLC consists of individual members who use the fuel truck to fuel private aircraft for
recreational purposes. The aircraft are located in hangars in the industrial park. The fuel truck
is operated on private roads, strictly within the boundaries of the industrial park.
The movement of hazardous material that occurs on private roads entirely within a contiguous
facility boundary where public access is restricted is not commercial transportation and
therefore is not subject to the requirements of the HMR. The HMR do not apply to motor
where public access is restricted, except to the extent that the movement is on or crosses a
vehicle movements of a hazardous material exclusively within a contiguous facility boundary
similar controls.
public road. If it is, access to the public road must be restricted by signals, lights, gates, or
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if you require additional assistance.
Sincerely,
/Chier, Standards Development
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
171.1 (d)
060113

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Eichenlaub
3171168)
Applicability
06-0113
Mr. Ed Mazzullo
PHMSA
Director of Hazmat Material Standards
May 11, 2006
400 Seventh Street SW
Washington, DC 20590
Re: Hazmat regulations of a non commercial fuel truck operating on private property
with public access
Dear Mr. Manzullo:
I need your help regarding a letter of advice (not a formal letter) regarding the application
of hazmat regulations on private property. A month ago I spoke with Mr. Dave
Donaldson in your department, 202-366-5869, who consulted with a staff attorney
regarding this issue and they determined that we are not covered by the regulations since
we are not in commerce, and we are operating on private property. 49CFR171.1 (d) (4) is
what they cited.
The issue at hand is the use of a fuel truck located in a privately owned industrial park
that is used to fuel airplanes located in hangers in the park. The park has an access
easement to a privately owned airport runway. The truck is owned by a club called Gas
Busters Social Club LLC, we have twelve members. We only use the truck to fuel our
own private aircraft, we do not sell fuel. None of our members use their aircraf: for
commercial operations, as the name implies this is a fun hog operation. We own the park
entirely, including the roads.
Yesterday we were approached by an investigator from UDOT (Utah) Gary Holfeltz
even though we owned the roads since we let the public enter the park we had to comply
who stated that we had to comply with the Federal Hazmat regulations. He stated that
with all of the same regulations as if we were acting as a common carrier of aviation
gasoline on public roads, (Hazmat # is 1203).
When asked which sections of code either State or Federal required this of private parties
not in commerce on their own land he was unable to answer. The complainant is the
they are improperly interpreting the hazmat regulations, which could force us to abandon
adjacent airport that has a monopoly on avgas sales on the airport property. We believe
our truck and buy from them, hence this request.

<<<PAGE 3>>>

We understand there may be State regulations that are stricter than the Federal guidelines,
and accordingly only seek advice regarding this situation at the Federal level. Mr.
Holfeltz admitted he had never encountered this situation before, and is not adverse to
your input. He did determine that we are not in commerce, and can confirm that the park
enforce any laws regarding roads in this park because it is private. You can confirm that
is privately held. The local police in Woods Cross, Utah where this park is located do not
by contacting Chief Paul Howard at 801-292-4422. We all need your help regarding how
to interpret these regulations at the Federal level.
If you need additional information please call me at 800-820-9114. My fax # is 801-656-
his fax # is 801-965-4847. E-mail to his department goes to tamyscott@utah.gov
2926. e-mail is jay.a.jensen@rbcdain.com Gary Holfeltz can be reached at 801-957-8581,
Sincerely
Jay Jensen

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2006/060113.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `3a41ece6a51d58cb4d5a0c7ca5266cd88ce65e270fcd029108277f5f8054e64c`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-23T13:52:01.723Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-06-0113`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "RBC Dam Rauscher"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr.. Jay Jensen"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "06-0113"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2006-07-27"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    171
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/63806"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "171.1"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/1711"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2006/060113.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2006/060113.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2006/060113.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/06-0113-0f8e180cb8.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "76d3c8d931a8c1c121b2ea8458b8d2c225f2ba4cda6f9fbe46954febbd12a081",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/06-0113-0f8e180cb8.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "79da951a34e700e9e746b8b57471d6a8eaf469121753c0a208fbe852d86af955",
      "pageCount": 3,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
