# Airgas-SAFECOR — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 06-0170  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2006-08-10

06-0170 response to Airgas-SAFECOR concerning 172.800.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportatior
Washington, D.C. 20590
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
piperials sately Administration
AUG 10 2006
Mr. John Anderson
P.O. Box 20067
Airgas-SAFECOR
Ref. No. C6-0170
Cheyenne, WY 82003
Dear Mr. Anderson:
This is in response to your letter requesting clarification of the security plan requirements
you ask whether the HMR require a "site specific" security plan. You state that you
under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically,
cannot find the term in the HMR, but understand that it is a requirement. You have been
asked by auditors to produce a site specific security plan and documentation of training
on the plan, and you request HMR cite references for these requirements.
The requirement to develop and implement a security plan applies to persons who offer
for transportation or transport the hazardous materials specified in § 172.800 of the
risks for shipments of the listed hazardous materials and appropriate measures to address
HMR. Each security plan must include an assessment of possible transportation security
unauthorized access, and en route security, as provided in § 172.802.
those risks. At a minimum, each security plan must address personnel security,
The HMR set forth general requirements for a security plan's components rather than a
standard providing shippers and carriers with the flexibility necessary to develop security
prescriptive list of specific items that must be included. The HMR set a performance
plans addressing their individual circumstances and operational environment.
Accordingly, each security plan will differ because it will be based on a shipper's or a
carrier's individualized assessment of the security risks associated with the specific
hazardous materials it ships or transports and its unique circumstances and operational
environment. For companies with more than one facility where a hazardous material
listed in § 172.800 is offered for transportation in commerce, each facility should have a
security plan tailored to the specific hazardous materials handled at the facility, the
physical characteristics of the facility, and the operational procedures in place at the
facility. A facility may utilize a security plan template developed by its corporate
leadership for all facilities owned by the corporation or an industry association or other
172.800
060170

<<<PAGE 2>>>

third-party with security planning expertise. However, each facility must adapt such
templates to ensure its security plan addresses any security vulnerabilities unique to that
facility.
To assist industry in complying with the security plan requirements, PHMSA developed a
identify areas in the transportation process where security procedures should be enhanced
security plan template to illustrate how risk management methodology could be used to
within the context of an overall risk management strategy. The security template is
posted in the docket and on the PHMSA website at http://hazmat.dot.gov/rmsef.htm.
With respect to documented training on the security plan, § 172.704(a)(4) and (a)(5)
requires a record of the training.
require security awareness and in-depth security training, respectively, and § 172.704(d)
I hope this information is helpful. If you need further assistance, please contact this
office.
Sincerely,
Holle Kilok
Hattie L. Mitchell
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Page 1 of 1
Drakeford, Carolyn <PHMSA>
From: Gorsky, Susan <PHMSA>
Sent:
VInture
Friday, July 21, 2006 7:12 AM
To:
Drakeford, Carolyn <PHMSA>
3172.800
Subject: FW: Question regarding security plans
Security Plans
Please enter this into the interp data base.
06 - 0!70
Susan
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 4:13 PM
From: John Anderson (SAFECOR) [mailto:John.Anderson@Airgas.com]
To: Heneghan, John <PHMSA>
Subject: Question regarding security plans
Good afternoon,
thought I read in the security section (of 49 CFR) that a site specific plan was required. And during recent
I would like to ask a question about security plans. Is the security plan required to be site specific? In the past I
PHMSA audits we have been asked to produce a site specific plan and documented training on the plan.
t a meetina todav at the CGA it was stated that the phrase site specific is not found in 49 CFR. I reviewed 4
FR 172.700 throuch 172.800 (Suboan H and I andi did not tind a reterence
Does PHMSA require a site specific plan and if so, what is the CFR reference?
Thank you for your response.
John Anderson
Airgas-SAFECOR
Cheyenne, WY 82003
P. O. Box 20067
Fax 1-307-778-7497
Phone 1-307-778-8809
john.anderson@airgas.com
7/21/2006

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2006/060170.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `05d45e291a1ef9694c0d236cb769ec66b33826cb6e972ff8f240cbd997fe5ceb`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-23T13:52:21.937Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-06-0170`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Airgas-SAFECOR"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. John Anderson"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "06-0170"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2006-08-10"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    172
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/50636"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "172.800",
    "172.802",
    "172.704(a)(4)",
    "172.700"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/172800"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2006/060170.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2006/060170.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2006/060170.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/06-0170-ee1cf0ee11.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "cf29b6448090a8b1c1dfce3202fc6f0b6bccd512afc0ee79ec8709adbc04d20f",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/06-0170-ee1cf0ee11.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "61e69ffa92d124f4f7765242febe5b57c531016396227c8c39fe6d08dbc30be0",
      "pageCount": 3,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
