# Packaging Applications for Dangerous Goods, LLC — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 08-0286  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2009-02-04

08-0286 response to Packaging Applications for Dangerous Goods, LLC concerning 180.352.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE
Washington, DC 20590
Mr. David Gluntz
Packaging Applications for Dangerous Goods, LLC
3583 Blackbottom Court
Columbus, OH 43221-4501
Ref No. 08-0286
Dear Mr. Gluntz:
This responds to your November 24, 2008 email requesting clarification of the provisions in the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to intermediate bulk
containers (IBCs). In your letter, you present two scenarios:
Scenario 1: If the specification markings on an IBC are destroyed, removed, or covered up, is the
package still an IBC?
Response 1: Because the specification markings are destroyed, removed, or covered up, the
packaging no longer meets the standards of an IBC in accordance with the HMR. The packaging
in your scenario is a non-specification bulk packaging.
Scenario 2: The only specification marking on a packaging is a serial number. The serial number
was traced back to a packaging manufacturer who states the packaging was manufactured as a
United Nations (UN) standard IBC. Must the packaging, originally a UN standard IBC, be
retested in accordance with 5 180.352?
Response 2: The answer is no. The packaging in your scenario is not represented as meeting a
UN standard, and, therefore, is not required to be retested in accordance with 5 180.352. As
stated in 5 180.352, each IBC constructed in accordance with a UN standard for which a test or
inspection specified in paragraphs (b)(l), (b)(2) and (b)(3) of 5 180.352 is required may not be
filled and offered for transportation or transported until the test or inspection has been
successfully completed. Additionally, your packaging may not be used to transport a hazardous
material required by the HMR to be transported in UN standard or DOT specification packagings
only.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if you require additional assistance.
at tie L. Mitchell
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Page 1 of 1
Drakeford, Carolyn <PHMSA>
--" - "" - - " . --- -- -
From: Foster, Glenn <PHMSA>
06-028d
Sent: To: Monday, November 10,2008 7:06 AM
INFOCNTR <PHMSA>; Drakeford, Carolyn <PHMSA>; Mazzullo, Ed <PHMSA>
Subject: RE: Specification markings
From: davidgluntz@padgllc.com
To: infocntr@dot.gov
Subject: Specification markings
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 19:08:28 -0400
Dear Mr. Mazzullo,
Friday, September 26th, I spoke with Glenn in the DOT's Information Center. He was very polite,
knowledgeable and it was a pleasure to work with him.
I asked Glenn two questions and would like a written confirmation because there currently is
confusion within the transportation industry regarding these questions.
Question 1: I f the specification markings on a packaging such as an Intermediate Bulk Container
(IBC) were destroyed, removed or covered up, is the packaging still an IBC? Glenn responded:
No. Because the specification markings were destroyed, removed or covered up, the packaging no
longer meets the 49 CFR's specification for an IBC.
Question 2: The only specification marking left on a packaging is the serial number. The serial
number was traced back to the packaging manufacturer who stated that the packaging was
originally manufactured as an IBC. Question: must this packaging (originally an IBC) be retested
per 49 CFR 180.352? Glenn responded: No. Because the packaging's markings are not per the 49
CFR's IBC specification, the packaging no longer is an IBC and is outside the DOT's regulatory
jurisdiction.
I am looking forward to settling this issue.
Sincerely,
David Gluntz
CONFIDENTIALITY IVOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. I f you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
David C. Gluntz
Packaging Applications for Dangerous Goods, LLC
3583 Blackbottom Court
Columbus, OH USA 43221-4501
Office (614) 529-0712
Cell (614) 425-7118
davidq luntz@padqllc.com
www . pads!l_c,~p_m " .. --

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2008/080286.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `d252f565f8cb7f3a4bc508fb040f91ddf271e152afc2b9f16b073ac7ce565f94`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T14:55:58.329Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-08-0286`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Packaging Applications for Dangerous Goods, LLC"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. David Gluntz"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "08-0286"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2009-02-04"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    180
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/45576"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "180.352"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/180352"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2008/080286.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2008/080286.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2008/080286.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/08-0286-1fb429f01e.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "6c48527462f0e14107b7d543b3fab1d8177053f22fb3aeb4ae54afcf255fecd2",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/08-0286-1fb429f01e.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "6ddcfad0cbbfba5f3de12f4d1cfcc5d81ae74d5ccd6a303ea8c9ae7a9e195c67",
      "pageCount": 2,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
