# Fanwood"Scotch Plains Recycling Association — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 09-0295  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2010-01-08

09-0295 response to Fanwood"Scotch Plains Recycling Association concerning 172.101.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
JAN - 8 2010
Washington, DC 20590
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Mr. Harold R. Clark
President
Fanwood-Scotch Plains Recycling Association
216 Second Street
Fanwood, NJ 07023
Ref. No. 09-0295
Dear Mr. Clark:
This responds to your November 23, 2009 letter requesting clarification of the
applicability ofthe Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) to
the transport of discarded household batteries. DOT has issued several letters including
a letter issued on June 23, 2009 (Ref. No. 09-0090) and August 13, 2009 (Ref. No.
09-0150), in which we provide interpretation on the applicability ofthe HMR to the
transportation of various types and sizes of used dry cell batteries. We have since
revised those interpretations (see Ref. No. 09-0090R and Ref. No. 09-0150R).
After further consideration and analysis ofdry battery chemistries and sizes and based
on information available to us, it is the opinion ofthis Office that used or spent dry,
sealed batteries ofboth non-rechargeable and rechargeable designs, described as
"Batteries, dry, sealed, n.o.s." in the Hazardous Materials Table in § 172.101 ofthe
HMR and not specifically covered by another proper shipping name, with a marked
rating up to 9-volt are not likely to generate a dangerous quantity of heat, short circuit, or
create sparks in transportation. Therefore, used or spent batteries ofthe type "Batteries,
dry, sealed, n.o.s." with a marked rating of 9-volt or less that are combined in the same
package and transported by highway or rail for recycling, reconditioning, or disposal are
not subject to the HMR. Note that batteries utilizing different chemistries (i.e., those
battery chemistries specifically covered by another proper shipping name) as well as dry,
sealed batteries with a marked rating greater than 9-volt may not be combined with used
or spent batteries of the type "Batteries, dry, sealed, n.o.s." in the same package. Note
also, that the clarification provided in this letter does not apply to batteries that have
been reconditioned for reuse.
I hope this answers your inquiry. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact this office.
Sincerly, i
./half; N l)./rIf!; 'J
ICharles ~.-;tts
\ Chief, Standards Development
~ce of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Learq
~172. l'dl
216 Second Street
Fanwood, NJ 07023 13a /krles
November 23, 2009
Of-o:L 9SU.S.
Department ofTransportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
East Building, 2nd Floor
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE
Washington, DC 20590
Dear Administrator:
I am writing on behalfofthe Fanwood-Scotch Plains Recycling Association to express our deep concern
and disappointment at the unintended consequences of ill-conceived federal regulations concerning
battery recycling.
In April, your agency issued clarification on regulations, now requiring that batteries being transported for
recycling, other than 1.5 V alkaline batteries, either be in individual plastic bags or have their terminals
covered by tape to prevent discharge ofresidual power that might spark a truck fire. Evidence cited was 3
fIres over the course of 3 years.
In light ofthis action, our Association has decided it will have to discontinue its 25 year old service of
collecting and recycling used batteries. It is too labor intensive for our all volunteer, self-funded
organization to get the batteries we collect into the required condition or, even ifthe public could be
educated to properly prepare their batteries before dropping them in the barrel, to ensure that everyone
did. Our county is likewise discontinuing its recycling program. .
We do realize that for household batteries, only the rechargeable ones are required by law to be recycled
because ofthe hazardous materials they contain, but most people do not know ofthis requirement nor is it
always easy to tell what type of battery one has. Residents will now have to determine iftheir batteries
are rechargeable or not, and take their rechargeable batteries to local stores that participate in the
Rechargeable Battery Recycling Corporation program. In contrast, our county and Recycling Association
collect all types ofbatteries, and let the vendor sort them in a process that is cost-effective for them
because ofvolume. Even batteries that do not have to be recycled may still contain materials that can
contaminate ground water or air, ifincinerated .
The practical effect ofyour regulations is to make recycling ofbatteries more difficult, and, faced with
such impediments; most people will simply not bother and will instead toss all batteries into the trash.
This means more batteries with toxic materials will be entering our landfills, potentially contaminating
our soil and water supplies or our air.
Ofcourse we realize that the Department ofTransportation is responsible only for weighing risk
associated with transportation, but in an overall evaluation ofrisk, we would far prefer the very low risk
ofa few truck fires to the risk ofcontamination ofour nation's soil, water, and air.

<<<PAGE 3>>>

We would urge you to reconsider this regulation or at least fmd a less onerous way to achieve the
necessary safety by transportation in an inert atmosphere or sealed container or some other technical fix.
Thank you for your consideration ofthis issue.
Sincerely yours,
)WJ- vhl
Harold R. Clark, President
Fanwood-Scotch Plains Recycling Association

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2009/090295.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `c07ba1e04cd9156a8955e20a9974bb01245202fe232b74f36e1120827070ddfd`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-26T00:06:52.502Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-09-0295`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Fanwood\"Scotch Plains Recycling Association"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Harold R. Clark"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "09-0295"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2010-01-08"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    172
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/60821"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "172.101"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/172101"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2009/090295.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2009/090295.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2009/090295.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/09-0295-71e0fd813c.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "9e39ef4cc7196448dbdee8e88499f0079d948c8ea46b2f272df7ab81e1ce7dc3",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/09-0295-71e0fd813c.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "6256b1356ee407cbba582813e887b67dafb5b4bef8248261c60bfa47b980fb55",
      "pageCount": 3,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
