# Mr. Frits Wybenga — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 10-0005  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2010-02-02

10-0005 concerning 171.12, 172.326.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
FEB 2 2010
1200 New Jersey Ave. SE
Washington. D.C. 20590
Mr. Frits Wybenga
Technical Director
1100 H Street, N. W., Suite 740
Washington, DC 20005
Ref. No. 10-0005
Dear Mr. Wybenga:
This responds to your January) 2, 2010 email regarding marking of portable tanks under the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you ask. when
shipping in accordance with the International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code as
authorized by the HMR, whether the technical name ofa hazardous material must be marked as
part of the proper shipping name on a portable tank.
In your email, you state that our interpretation of the marking requirements for cargo transport
units (bulk type packagings) under the IMDG Code (Ref. No. 04-0039; April 6, 2004) differs
from an interpretation provided by the United States Coast Guard (USCG) (1 6703/IMDG/2007027;
February 27. 2007). Your understanding is that the interpretation provided by the USCG is
correct in that the technical name marking requirement in Special Provision 274 is not
applicable to a cargo transport unit (e.g., a portable tank) under Chapter 3.3 ofthe IMDG Code.
You request that we clarify which letter provides the correct interpretation of the IMDG Code
marking requirements.
Your understanding is correct. After consultation with the USCG, we concluded that the
interpretation provided in the USCG letter is the correct interpretation. For those proper
shipping names assigned Special Provision 274 in the Dangerous Goods List ofthe IMDG
Code, the requirement to supplement the proper shipping name marking with a technical name
applies only to packages. For purposes of the IMDG Code, a portable tank is a cargo transport
unit, not a package, and thus, it is not subject to the supplemental marking requirement in
Special Provision 274. We will retract our April 6. 2004 letter to avoid any additional
confusion.
I hope this information is helpful. If you have fut1her questions, please contact this office.
hiet: Standards Development
I~ of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA)
From: Mitchell, Hattie (PHMSA)
Sent: Tuesday, January 12,20105:44 PM
To: Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA)
Subject: FW: Reminder: Marking of technical names on portable tanks
Attachments: 040039.pdf; 2007 HPS - USCG -Marking of portable tanks. pdf; DSC 13-3-10[1].pdf
Please log in for handling.
From: Frits Wybenga [mailto:fwybenga@dgac.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 5:36 PM
To: Kelley, Shane (PHMSA); Mitchell, Hattie (PHMSA)
Subject: FW: Reminder: Marking of technical names on portable tanks
Shane, Hattie - the two interp letters are at odds. One says you need the technical name as part of the PSN on
portable tanks under IMDG while the other says you do not. Based on the DSC discussion at DSC 13 on the
Netherlands paper above. DSC concluded that the technical name was not required. Below is an excerpt from
DSC 13:
Marking of the proper shipping name on tank transport units containing dangerous goods
3.15 The Sub-Committee, having considered the outcome of the group's discussion regarding
the marking of the proper shipping name on tank transport units containing dangerous goods and
the related document DSC 13/3/10 (Netherlands), agreed that for marine pollutants the correct
technical name need not be shown on tanks.
3.16 The Sub-Committee further agreed that, in view of the above decision, an amendment to
MARPOl Annex III would be necessary and, as such, prepared a justification for a new work
programme item, set out in annex 3.
So the USCG is correct and the PHMSA interp is wrong. This is causing confusion among DGAC members.
Would be good if you all straightened out the confusion created by Mr. Gale's erroneous response. Note also
that contrary to John's letter PSN's are not required on cargo tanks.
Frits
1112/2010

<<<PAGE 3>>>

• 0 .'," 0',~.""
U.S. Deportment 400 Seventh SI.. S.W.
of Trcnsportctlon Washington. D.C. 20590
APR - 6 2004
ResearCh and
Special Programs
Administration
Mr. Ronald J. Stokes Ret No. 04-0039
ExxonMobil Chemical Company
Intennediates, Synthetics Product .steJVardship
P.O. Box 3140
Edison, New Jersey 08818
Dear Mr. Stokes:
This responds to your March 1,2004 letter, r~questing clarification on marking requirements for bulk
packagings under the Hazardous Matenals Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically,
you ask ifthe technical name is required as part ofthe marking on bulk packagings, s~ch as portable
tanks in intennodal movement from highway or rail to vessel.
" ,'" 0':, ;f", :!.. ! l~. l' •
I.
Sections 172.326, 172.328, and 172.330 generally require bulk packagings, such as portable tanks,
cargo tanks and tank cars, to be marked with the shlpping name or appropriate common name, and
UN identification number. The Htv.tR, dq not require the technical name to be marked on bulk
packagings. However, ifyou choosetq,qpso!,it is pennissible.
The International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code Special Provision 274 states that, "for the
purposes ofdocumentation and pack;ll~~ marking, the proper shipping name shall be supplemented with
the technical name" (see 3.1.2.8;1). Therefore, for those materials ~hat are required to comply with
Special Provision 274 in Column 6 ofthe ThIDG Dangerous Goods List, you must include the technical
name when marking the proper shipping name" on bulk packagings. Use ofthe IMDG Code for
transportation through the United States when part ofthe movement ofthe hazardous material is by
vessel is authorized under § 171.1Z@)." .
I hope this answers your inquiry.
Sincerely,
~/I(~'~:' :
"J~~
~
. Chief, Standards Development
Office ofHazardous Materials Standards
" '. ;:~)'.'. .' 0 ," _'. ,"
oj,;
§ 1'1/ . / 2. (b)
~J7z.·3l)2.
1111111111111111111
040039
~I

<<<PAGE 4>>>

03/81/2604 16:11 732:3216E157
.,
ExxonMobll Chemioal Comp3nv
Intermediates, Synthetics product Stewardshjp
P,O. 8011 3140
Edison. New Jlll'Gey 08818
732 321 6033 Telephone
732321 6051 Facsimile
PRODUCT STEWARDSHIP
March 1, 2004
U.S. Department ofTranspottatiOll
Research aDd Special Programs Administratio;n
Attn: Office ofHazardOtt!I Materials S~~ds
DHM-IO
400 7th Stteet, SW
Washington, DC 20590-0001
Dear Sir or Madam:
Queltio,p.
Is the tec.bnicaI name required as part oftbe lI1arlciDg o.n bulk paclca.gings?
CommeDU
After review of the mumg rcquircmenu lit § t72.3oa, §172.326(a) for Portable tImks, §172.328 8: special
provision B8S for cargo tanks, and §172.330 :t9f.raiJ tank cars, I fin~ X'o requirement for marldng the technic::al
name on bulk packaging. '
Is that an accutatc understanding of,the mar'dl1.!x:~quimmeIlts?
'./I
also take Dote in. a lette1' ofintetpretatiqn dated April 16, 1996 wbete the technical name was shown in
cOlljUl1ction with a question con<:eminS ~~~ ofa portable tank, but the applieationofthe techuical name.
was not specifically adch:essed in that Te,SJ!I?,~S,c. .
Please note this question has com.c up mosr often re~~~ portable ta'Ok$ in intennodal movc:ment (highway to
water or rail to water). In these movement$ tbe technical name has been applied, as part of the marking,
pursuant to the allowance and reqlrlrCln4?Dt in §l71.1 2(b) and special provision 274 ofthe IMDG Code
respectfuUy. . - . ,
[ may be reached III the address shown above or by telephone at (732) 321·6046 or by email at
ron.j.stokes@exx,onmobil.com .
Thanking you in advance for your hel)) in thi,,, matwr~
z=g'.r,. ci7i
Ron.ald J. Stokes
A Division of Exxon Mobil COl'poratlan

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2010/100005.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `4c6ec4b428445a5d665f4b3963c7c94eac1b994f436bfce53696f2a496057e5f`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-23T08:50:01.492Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-10-0005`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Frits Wybenga"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "10-0005"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2010-02-02"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    171,
    172
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 2,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/51806"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "171.12",
    "172.326",
    "172.328",
    "172.330",
    "171.1Z"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/17112",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/172326"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2010/100005.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2010/100005.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2010/100005.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/10-0005-b555dd4262.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "f32d75b21955ccebf1a37f5b5a4ca4a12d43edf3742251d188435366985d27f5",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/10-0005-b555dd4262.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "ab6ded9e89efc840caa5e8c3c3a7c2e06bd9696780bdd40a919ff44c60785cdf",
      "pageCount": 4,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
