# TEN-E Packaging Services, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 11-0041  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2011-03-01

11-0041 response to TEN-E Packaging Services, Inc. concerning 178.503, 178.508, 178.523, 178.601.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE
Washington, D.C. 20590
MAR 0 1 2011
Mr. Robert J. Ten Eyck
Director, Technical Services
TEN-E Packaging Services, Inc.
1666 County Road 74
Newport, MN 55055
Ref. No. 11-0041
Dear Mr. Ten Eyck:
This responds to your February 16, 2011 letter regarding the proper marking of an approved
packaging design having different specifications than those prescribed in the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). Specifically, you ask whether the letter
"W" should immediately follow the packaging identification code" 1 G" marked on a fiber drum
packaging approved under the provisions in § 178.601(h). You state the approval was issued.
l;>ecause the fiber drum design did not meet the construction standards prescribed in § 178.508
and did not specifically direct the packaging manufacturer to apply the "W" mark as part of the
UN marking.
The answer is yes. A packaging having specifications different from those prescribed in
§§ 178.504-178.523 may be used if approved by the Associate Administrator. Such packagings
must be shown to be equally effective as those prescribed. See § 178.601(h). Furthermore, as
specified in § 178.503(a)(2), the letter "W" must follow the packaging identification code on
such packagings when required by an approval under the provisions of § 178.601(h). Although
your client's approval does not specifically mandate the "W" mark be applied, nothing in the
HMR prohibits indicating it in the appropriate position as part of its UN marking.
I trust this satisfies your inquiry. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
T. Glenn Foster
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 2>>>

IFebruary 16, 2011
,
I Charles Betts
IU.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
! Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
I Standards &Rulemaking PHH-10
I 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S. E.
! Washington, D.C. 20590
IDear Charles:
I,' TEN-E Packaging Services is writing to request a clarification as to when it is appropriate to apply the "W" mark to a UN
packaging. We recently assisted a client with obtaining a competent authority approval to manufacture a drum that did not
Imeet the construction standards for fiber drums found in Section 178.508 of Title 49 CFR. The competent authority
I approval did not specifically direct the container manufacturer to apply the "W" mark as a part of the UN marking; however
I it is our understanding that based on the wording of Sections 178.601 (h) Approval of equivalent packagings and
i 178.503(a)(2) Marking of packagings that the "W" mark should be employed even though it is not being called for in the
I competent authority approval.
!
I i Your guidance on this container marking issue is greatly appreciated.
ISincerely,
I
I I OirecluT,'f'.,..... "._.
I Tp,.F; Pudlll~nA s"n·ic... "" 1m'.
li j
TEN-E Packaging Services, Inc.
I 1666 County Road 74
! Newport. MN 55055
I Phone: 651-459-0671 Email: info@ten-e.com
i Fax: 651-459-1430 Web: www.ten-e.com
-··UNil:ED-STA:rEs-~··i\lft\r-----·-·-

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110041.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `a77ba5d7de488e840802deb2d9ef14eb87d213eee6cf992716321e9d4c8166b7`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T07:21:09.634Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-11-0041`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "TEN-E Packaging Services, Inc."
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Robert J. Ten Eyck"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "11-0041"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2011-03-01"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    178
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 4,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/61281"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "178.503",
    "178.503(a)(2)",
    "178.508",
    "178.523",
    "178.601",
    "178.601(h)",
    "178.504"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/178503",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/178508",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/178523",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/178601"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110041.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110041.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110041.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/11-0041-5a8b6f3ae5.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "24ca9e729079909c2714052aa6705e80a5ffe1006eec527cc248195b268dc802",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/11-0041-5a8b6f3ae5.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "11abf5aa6a8afc84b3a026f21dc50a0b602e26a91a0699d570e3827bbd5d9218",
      "pageCount": 2,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
