# National Aquatic Service, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 11-0151  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2011-08-25

11-0151 response to National Aquatic Service, Inc. concerning 173.302a, 180.205.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

u.s. Department 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
of Transportation Washington. DC 20590
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety AUG 252011
Administration
Mr. Michael Druce
National Aquatic Service, Inc.
1732 Erie Blvd. East
Syracuse, NY 13210-1296
Reference No.: 11-0151
Dear Mr. Druce:
This responds to your letter requesting clarification of the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to the requalification and use of
Department of Transportation (DOT) specification cylinders. Your questions are
paraphrased and answered as follows:
Q1. Is it required to compute the average and maximum wall stress limitations using the
formulas provided in § 173.302a(b )(3) when the Relative Elastic Expansion (REE)
has been marked on the cylinder by the manufacturer?
AI. The answer is no. In accordance with § 173.302a(b)(3), either the average wall
stress or the maximum wall stress can be used to determine compliance; both
calculations are not required. Furthermore, in addition to the formula provided in
§ 173.302a(b )(3)(i)(A), compliance with the average wall stress limitation may be
determined by computing the elastic expansion rejection limit in accordance with
Compressed Gas Association (CGA) pamphlet C-5, by reference to data tabulated
in CGA C-5, or by the manufacturer's marked elastic expansion rejection limit
(REE) on the cylinder. It should be noted however, that if the maximum wall stress
is used to determine compliance with § 173.302a(b)(3), the formula provided in
§ 173.302a(b )(3)(ii) must be used to determine the maximum wall stress.
Q2. If a facility only plus (+) stamps cylinders based on the REE marked on the
cylinder by the manufacturer, is it necessary to have a copy of CGA C-5?
A2. The answer is no. There is no requirement in the HMR mandating a facility to
retain a copy of CGA C-5. However, if a facility is using CGA C-5 as the method
to compute the average wall stress limitation, in accordance with
§ 173.302a(b )(3)(iii), that facility should have access to a CGA C-5.
Q3. Must an authorized retesting facility notify itself in writing of the condemnation
when a cylinder owned by that facility, such as a cylinder used for rental purposes,
fails periodic requalification?

<<<PAGE 2>>>

A3. The answer is no. In accordance with 180.205(i)(3), the requalifier of a cylinder
must notify the cylinder owner, in writing, that the cylinder is condemned and may
not be filled with hazardous material and offered for transportation in commerce
where use of a specification packaging is required. However, if an authorized
retesting facility is also the owner of the condemned cylinder it is not the intention
of the HMR to require self notification.
Q4. If the owner of a condemned cylinder relinquishes ownership of that condemned
cylinder to the retesting facility for disposal or destruction, must the retesting
facility disposing or destroying the cylinder notify the now former owner in writing
of that cylinder's condemnation?
A4. The answer is no. In accordance with 180.205(i)(3), the requalifier of a cylinder
must notify the cylinder owner, in writing, that the cylinder is condemned and may
not be filled with hazardous material and offered for transportation in commerce
where use of a specification packaging is required. If the condemned cylinder is
relinquished by a facility that is both the owner and requalifier to a subsequent
facility for disposal or destruction, no notification would be required.
I hope this satisfies your inquiry. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
T. Glenn Foster
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

National Aquatic Service, Inc
1732 Erie Blvd East
Syracuse, NY 13210-1296
3154795544 www.nationalaquatic.com
315479 5766 fax info@nationalaquatic.com
BOO SEA DIVE
Bened·{~+,
~ /18. 302~(h'M)
5 I ~o .UJ5 (;)(3)
~/,nd(~
11-0/5/
June 2, 2011
U.S. DOT
PHMSA Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
Attn: PHH-I0
East Building
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.
Washington, DC 20590-0001
RE: Request for Interpretation{s)
To Whom It May Concern:
National Aquatic Service, Inc. (RINC234) is a SCUBA diving facility. During a recent
inspection, the following issues of interpretation arose.
1. Regarding Wall Stress Calculation requirements of §173.302a(b)(3).
a. Is it required to compute average and/or.maximum wall stress
calculations when the REE is marked on the cylinder by the
manufacturer?
b. If a facility only Plus (+) stamps cylinders with the REE marked on the
cylinder by the manufacturer, is it necessary to have a copy of CGA
C-5?
2. Regarding notification of cylinder owner in writing when a cylinder must be
condemned of § 1 BO.205(i){3)
a. Must an authorized retesting facility, a SCUBA facility, notify itself in
writing of the condemnation when a cylinder owned by that facility, such
as a cylinder used for rental purposes, fails periodic requalification?
b. If the owner of a condemned cylinder relinqUishes ownership of that
cylinder to the retesting facility for disposal, must the retester 'notify the
now former owner in writing of that cylinder's condemnation?

<<<PAGE 4>>>

National Aquatic Service, Inc
1 732 Erie Blvd East
Syracuse, NY 13210-1296
315 479 5544 www.nationalaquatic.com
3154795766 fax info@nationalaquatic.com
800 SEA DIVE
Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you for you assistance in this
matter.
Sincerely,
Michael Druce
Facility Manager RINC234
National Aquatic Service, Inc

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110151.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `1987708a63447a89753e0d5d46b73b6a37db0932f8de2b2739ea1c39a3113d5d`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-23T10:58:42.241Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-11-0151`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "National Aquatic Service, Inc."
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Michael Druce"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "11-0151"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2011-08-25"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    173,
    180
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 2,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/55206"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "173.302a",
    "180.205",
    "180.205(i)(3)"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/173302a",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/180205"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110151.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110151.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110151.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/11-0151-15c18f878c.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "80c0a615b26760b6153047ea656bb25b576838949cbda88df5b193a3b81856f9",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/11-0151-15c18f878c.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "9bf8e0c69b06e896391c7319ded619f01e596b54edc76ef72652b0d107dbedbf",
      "pageCount": 4,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
