# Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation 11-0153

**Citation:** 11-0153  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2011-12-21

11-0153 concerning 171.8.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
of Transportation Washington. DC 20590
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
A&cn~tia~o11
Sergeant Brad C. Gibson
Texas Highway Patrol
Commercial Vehicle Training Unit
Texas Department of Public Safety
455 "S" State Highway I
Georgetown, TX 78628
Reference No. 11-0153
Dear Sergeant Gibson:
This is in response to your July 6, 2011 letter and e-mail requesting clarification on how
tube trailer motor vehicles are defined under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR;
49 CFR Parts 171-180), and ask if Reference No. 10-0116 supercedes Reference No. 880026.
You refer to two letters ofclarification this Office issued under Reference Nos. 880026
(to Paul Horgan; 4/28/1998) and 10-0116 (to Neil Banman; 5/12/2011). Specifically,
you ask under what circumstances manifolded, non-bulk packagings would be considered
a single bulk packaging.
Because the two letters describe different packagings with different associated risks, which
we restate later in this letter, the letter issued under Reference No. 10-0116 does not
supercede the letter issued under Reference No. 88-0026. Manifolded cylinders have
inherent design risks, such as exposed cylinder shells and piping, opportunities for product
backflow and backflash, and are usually designed to carry larger quantities of gas. All of
these factors can contribute to the loss of an entire load during an incident. Therefore, it is
the opinion of this Office that:
• cylinders interconnected through manifolding that use a common outlet (e.g., a
pressure regulator) operate as an integral unit;
• non-bulk cylinders that are manifolded in a tube trailer such that the aggregate
capacity of the tube trailer meets the definition prescribed in § 171.8 of the HMR
for a bulk packaging must be treated as one bulk packaging;
• individual non-bulk cylinders that are not manifolded and are designed to operate
separately with their own stop valves are non-bulk packingings.
The Reference No. 88-0026 letter states two compartments permanently attached to a
motor vehicle and used in the same manner as a cargo tank to dispense gasoline and diesel
fuel to other vehicles that are manifolded together without valves to separate them are
considered a bulk packaging if they have an aggregate capacity that exceeds 450 L. In

<<<PAGE 2>>>

addition, this letter states manifolded bulk packagings permanently attached to a motor
vehicle that are designed to perform as cargo tanks contain safety features and
appurtenances and are sometimes subject to different or lesser stresses than tube trailer
cylinders. This letter also states if each compartment has valving that is closed during
transportation, each compartment is considered a separate packaging regardless of whether
the compartments have a contiguous shell. You state that based on Reference No. 88-0026
your organization has maintained the view that:
1) manifolded, non-bulk packagings with their own stop valve in the closed position
are separate packagings;
2) manifolded, non-bulk packagings with their own stop valve in the open position are
a single bulk packaging when their aggregate capacity exceeds 450 L; and
3) manifolded, non-bulk packagings without their own stop valve are a single bulk
packaging when their aggregate capacity exceeds 450 L.
We disagree. The Reference No. 88-0026 letter concerned packagings designed to operate
as cargo tanks. For the reasons stated earlier in this letter, it is the opinion of this Office
that manifolded cylinders have the ability to release their entire contents during an incident
regardless of whether they have individual stop valves in the opened or closed position or
they are without stop valves.
The Reference No. 10-0116 letter states a tube trailer that contains non-bulk cylinders is a
bulk packaging because it is a transport vehicle, and because it is designed to transport gas
in an aggregate quantity greater than 3,000 L (792 gallons), which meets the definition of a
bulk packaging under § 171.8 of the HMR. This letter also states cylinders in a tube trailer
that each have their own shut-off valve and are connected with stainless steel tubing
through a header, heat exchanger, and several additional valves to an automated valve that
controls outlet pressure are also one bulk packaging under the HMR.
I hope this satisfies your request.
Sincerely,
--7~L~~~,
T. Glenn Foster
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division
2

<<<PAGE 3>>>

t:-Cl monsen
~ 11 2. SOD
~ (],. ~ 5e~tj"'f~
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY I 1- 0153
5805 N. LAMAR BLVD. BOX 4087 • AUSTIN, TEXAS 78773-0001
512/424-2000
www.txdps.state.tx.us
STEVEN C. McCRAW
COMMISSION
DIRECTOR ALLAN B POLUNSKY, CHAIR
LAMAR BECKWORTH
ADA BROWN
CHERYL MacBRIDE JOHN STEEN
DEPUTY DIRECTORS CARIN MARCY BARTH
A. CYNTHIA LEON
Mr. Charles E. Betts July 6, 2011
Director, Office of Hazardous Materials Standards
U.S. DOT/PHMSA (PHH-lO)
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE East Building, 2nd Floor
Washington, DC 20590-0001
Dear Mr. Betts,
I am requesting written clarification on the manifolding of non-bulk packages and its subsequent
effect on the packages' status of becoming a single bulk package, when statutorily defined amounts
are met, or remaining separate non-bulk packages. There seems to be some confusion in the
enforcement community, since interpretation 10-0116 was issued by your office on May 12, 2011,
on whether manifolded non-bulk packages, each with its own shut-off valve, transported in the
closed position, retain their status as non-bulk packages or become a single bulk package.
In your office's letter to Mr. Paul Hogan, on April 28, 1998, it is written by your office, "Two
compartments manifolded together without valves to separate the compartments would be
considered a bulk package ifthe aggregate capacity exceeds 450 liters. When valving is present and
closed during transport each compartment is considered a separate packaging. This remains true
whether or not the packagings have a contiguous shell." We understand this to mean that closed
valving constitutes an intermediate form of containment for the purposes of determining if a
package meets the definition of a bulk package or not.
Our Department has long used the above language to view: 1) separate non-bulk packages,
manifolded together, each with their own stop valve in the closed position during transport, as
separate non-bulk packages, 2) separate non-bulk packages, manifolded together, each with their
own stop valve in the open position during transport, as a single bulk package (when the aggregate
capacity exceeds 450 liters) and 3) separate non-bulk packages, manifolded together, each without
their own stop valve, as a single bulk package (when the aggregate capacity exceeds 450 liters).
Our officers often encounter trucks and trucks and trailers transporting multiple non-bulk packages
containing combustible liquids that are manifolded. Our understanding is that based upon the
presence of a stop valve for each package, in a closed position during transport, the packages
remain non-bulk and exempt from the HMRs, while the absence of a stop valve for each package or
presence of a stop valve for each package, in an open position during transport, the packages are
then considered to be a bulk package and the HMRs become applicable. In some ofthe
configurations we encounter, the non-bulk packages can be filled and/or drained simultaneously and
some configurations further utilize anti-backflow valves.
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
COURTESY. SERVICE. PROTECTION

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110153.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `25470359516e353e7c4da7d159c4d3f6a2f1468f0f3de18b6d171e6eac8c65a4`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T02:51:33.750Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-11-0153`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [],
  "individuals": [],
  "refIds": [
    "11-0153"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2011-12-21"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    171
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/55516"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "171.8"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/1718"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110153.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110153.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2011/110153.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/11-0153-8893b07d23.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "eb3d1b2a4b39a7b4e59925489b6de0aa0e404cdc58ce9afcbfacff520ec5da4e",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/11-0153-8893b07d23.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "8764a7bf57c62beb10c4c8b0ef840720a9b3c5a3e34929c0e6294a31e1c6c7b7",
      "pageCount": 3,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
