# MT Associates, L.L.C. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 12-0032  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2012-03-15

12-0032 response to MT Associates, L.L.C. concerning 171.12.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
of Transportation Washington. DC 20590
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
MAR 1 5 2012
Mr. E. A. AItemos
HMT Associates, L.L.c.
603 King Street
Suite 300
Alexandria, VA 22314-3105
Reference No.: 12-0032
Dear Mr. Altemos:
This is in response to your November 9, 2011 letter requesting confirmation, as the
Competent Authority of the United States, for the purposes of implementation of the
International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code, of your understanding of the
meaning of the ternl "operational equipment" in the context of IMDG Code 6.9.3.1.2, and
further that no competent authority approval of any operational equipment that may be
employed to meet the requirements of that paragraph is necessary under the IMDG Code.
Your understanding is correct. You note that 6.9.3.1.2 of the IMDG Code allows, as an
alternative to purpose-designed and constructed non-pressurized containers for dry bulk
conforming to ISO 1496-4:1991 (see 6.9.3.1.1), the use as a bulk container of a general
purpose freight container conforming to ISO 1496-1:1990, when such freight container is
equipped with operational equipment designed to strengthen the end walls and to improve
the longitudinal restraint as necessary to comply with the test requirements of ISO 14964:1991,
provided all other applicable requirements of 6.9.3 are satisfied.
We concur with your understanding that the term "operational equipment" in the context of
this provision includes additional structural members, and/or any other materials or means
that may be installed that augment the end wall strength as necessary for the freight
container with the operational equipment installed to comply with the end wall test
requirements of ISO 1496-4:1991. Moreover, it is the responsibility of the person filling
and offering the freight container for transport to ensure that this requirement, like all other

<<<PAGE 2>>>

requirements attached to the use of bulk containers for the transport of solid substances in
bulk, is satisfied. Further in this connection, since the need for competent authority
approval of such operational equipment is not specifically required under 6.9.3.1.2, no
approval by this agency of the arrangement employed to satisfy the requirements of that
paragraph is necessary.
I trust this satisfies your inquiry. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Delmer Billings
Senior Regulatory Advisor
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

~Qbieh
gI11./~
HMT ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. :r:MDC:?
603 KING ST. Il-003A-.J
SlHTE300
ALEXANHRfA, VA 22314-3\05
E..-\. ALTEMOS
PATRICIA A. QlT~i\
703-549-0727
FACSIM1LlE: 703-549-0727
WRrTERS DIRECT DIAL NlIMBER
703-549-0727, ext. 11
November 9, 2011
Mr. Shane Kelley
International Standards (PHH-13)
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
East Building, 2nd Floor
Washington, D.C. 20590-0001
Dear Mr. Kelley,
This is to request your confirmation of my understanding of a provision in the
IMDG Code relating to the structural standards for freight containers used as "bulk
containers." Specifically, the issue relates to the proper interpretation of the term
"operational equipment" as that term is u~ed in 6.9.3.1.2 ofthe IMDG Code. This
paragraph allows, as an alternative to purpose-designed and constructed non-pressurized
containers for dry bulk conforming to ISO 1496-4: 1991 (see 6.9.3.1.1), the use as a bulk
container of a "standard" freight container conforming to ISO 1496-1: 1990 when such
freight container is equipped with "operational equipment" designed to strengthen the
end walls and to improve the longitudinal restraint as necessary to comply with the test
requirements ofISO 1496-4:1991 - provided, naturally, that all other applicable
requirements in 6.9.3 are satisfied.
My understanding ofthe term "operational requirement" in the context of this
provision is that the term includes, for example, additional structural members (such as
metal bars) and/or other materials that may be installed within a standard freight
container so as to augment the end wall strength as necessary for the freight container
with operational equipment installed to be capable ofcomplying with the end wall test
requirements in ISO 1496-4: 1991. Moreover, I understand that it is the responsibility of
the person filling and offering the freight container for transport to ensure that this
requirement, like all other requirements attaching to the use of bulk containers for the
transport of solid substances in bulk, is satisfied for example in this particular case, by

<<<PAGE 4>>>

HM AS OCIATES, L.L.C.
Mr. Shane Kelley
November 9,2011
Page 2
engineering analysis to determine that the freight container with operational equipment
installed is capable of complying with the end wall test requirements in ISO 1496-4:1991.
Consequently, no approval of the operational equipment by the competent authority is
required.
Your confirmation of my correct understanding ofthe meaning of the term
"operational equipment" in the context oflMDG Code 6.9.3.1.2, and that no competent
authority approval of any operational equipment that may be employed to meet the
requirements of this paragraph is necessary under the IMDG Code, will be most
appreciated.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter, and please do not hesitate to
contact me if you have questions or require additional information in relation to this
request.
Sincerely,
E. A. Altemos

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2012/120032.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `a8786c6723914e083538cc9fc4230e95bb7157e2ddcf837e2ed44d4263408c29`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-23T01:02:11.774Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-12-0032`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "MT Associates, L.L.C."
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. E. A. Altemos"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "12-0032"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2012-03-15"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    171
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/58406"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "171.12"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/17112"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2012/120032.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2012/120032.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2012/120032.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/12-0032-c9e8dd0f5e.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "4381791acfa7260c40c9d1d3c06c13af3839d8ad85a502b52439a5f04279badf",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/12-0032-c9e8dd0f5e.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "7c3739e3cb413f81f0d8fe2634f8c266555b4153a14b08bb227ade9410c4ba9c",
      "pageCount": 4,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
