# RemTec International — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 12-0118  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2012-08-15

12-0118 response to RemTec International concerning 171.23, 171.25.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, D.C. 20590
Ms. Patricia Burns
RemTec International
1 00 Haskins Road
Bowling Green, OH 43402
AUG 1 5 2012
Ref. No.: 12-0118
Dear Ms. Burns:
This is in response to your letter requesting clarification of requirements in the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to the transport of non-
DOT specification cylinders filled with a compressed gas and transported in a port area.
Specifically you ask if you can receive bromotrifluoromethane in non-DOT specification
cylinders and subsequently transport the cylinders and transfer the bromotrifluoromethane to
a DOT specification cylinder prior to leaving the port area in accordance with the provisions
of§ 171.25(d).
The answer is no, § 171.25( d) does not apply to the activities you describe, as it only
authorizes the transportation of non-DOT specification cylinders, not the discharge of their
contents. Conversely,§ 171.23(a)(3) applies to transportation of imported cylinders for
discharge within a single port area. In accordance with§ 171.23(a)(3), imported non-DOT
specification cylinders may be transported within a single port area and discharged if: (1) the
Associate Administrator grants an approval for this activity; (2) the cylinders are certified as
conforming with the transportation regulations of another country; (3) they are transported
within a closed freight container; ( 4) the importer certifies that they provide an equivalent
level of safety as comparable DOT specification cylinders; and (5) the cylinders are not
refilled for export except in compliance with § 171.23(a)( 4).
An application for an approval should contain a description of what is requested, operational
and quality controls, packaging authorizations, and any other documentation sufficient to
support the application. You may review complete requirements regarding approvals in
§§ 107.701-107.717.
I hope this information is helpful. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact this office.
Sincerely,
/~!)~
Robert Benedict
Chief, Standards Development
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Associate Administrator for Hazardous Materials Safety
U.S. Department of Transportation
Washington D.C. 20590-0001
713-272-2821 fax
Subject: Request for clarification for shipment of non-DOT cylinders
Attention Mr. Shawn Daniels, Mr. Duane Cassidy and Mr. Raymond LaMagdelaine
In August 2000, RemTec International received a letter from the US DOT Chief of Special
Investigations, Office of Hazardous Materials Enforcement (Attachment #1) that addressed the
question of the legality of receiving Bromotrlfluoromethane (Halon 1301) in non-DOT
specification cylinders, and subsequently transfer the Bromotrifluoromethane to DOT
specification cylinders prior to leaving the port area. The following is from that letter: "The
answer to your question is yes. Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations 171.12 c states (see
attachment) and condudes ...... "Thus if the Bromotrifluoromethane is packaged in cylinders
which meet the requirements of the country of origin, all you will need to transport them to the
warehouse with the port area is the shipping paper and placards for the transport vehicle."
Using this letter as authority, RemTec International has imported non-DOT cylinders and
transferred material at the port area into DOT cylinders.
In May, 2012 a shipment of non-DOT cylinders of Halon 1301 from Norway to the Port of
Norfolk was questioned by the U. S. Coast Guard and Rem Tee was asked to present an approval
document from DOT for this shipment. When presenting the letter attached we were informed
that CFR49 171.12 c clause in no longer part of the regulation. However we believe an approval
is still not required because our shipment meets the requirements of this section that replaces
171.12 c:
CFR 49171 subpart C Section 171.25 d
(d) Use of IMDG Code in port areas. {1) Except for Division 1.1, 1.2, and Class 7 materials, a hazardous
material being imported into or exported from the United States or passing through the United States in
the course of being shipped between locations outside the United States may be offered and accepted for
transportation and transported by motor vehicle within a single port area, including contiguous harbors/
when packaged, marked, classed, labeled, stowed and segregated in accordance with the IMDG Code/
~~,.,
RemTec International, 100 Haskins Road, Bowling Green, OH 43402, USA 419-867-8990
Page 1

<<<PAGE 3>>>

offered and accepted in accordance with the requirements of subparts C (shipping papers) and F
{placarding) of part 172 of this subchapter pertaining to shipping papers and placarding, and otherwise
conforms to the applicable requirements of part 176 of this subchapter.
We request a clarification and an updated letter citing 49 CFR 171.25d clause permits the same
activity as the old clause ( CFR49 171.12 c) under the same conditions because according to the
Coast Guard's May 2012 report from Mr. Duane Cassidy, Chief, Pressure Vessel Division, 202-
366-4511 the following clause is applicable:
CFR 49 171.23(a) (3)
(3) fmportation of cylinders for discharge within a single port area: A cylinder manufactured to other
than a DOT specification or UN standard in accordance with part 178 of this subchapter and certified as
bejng in conformance with the transportation regulations of another country may be authorized, upon
written request to and approval by the Associate Administrator, for transportation within a single port
area, provided--
(i) The cylinder is transported in a closed freight container;
{ii) The cylinder is certified by the importer to provide a level of safety at feast equivalent to that
required by the regulations in this subchapter for a comparable DOT specification or UN cylinder; and
(iii) The cylinder is not refilled for export unless in complfance with paragraph (a){4) of this section.
Therefore we respectfully request clarification on this as these full non dot cylinders do not
leave the port area and are not transported over DOT public roads and therefore we believe
49 CFR 171.23 (a)(3) should not apply and therefore no advance approval is required.
Please contact me for any additional information that you may require.
Sincerely,
RemTec International
Patricia. burns@remtec. net
Supporting Documents
US DOT Letter of August 15th, 2000
-
RemTec International, 100 Haskins Road, Bowling Green, OH 43402, USA 419-867~8990
Page 2

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2012/120118.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `6fd8f25c2b7fb36791395ea2584b1b1f4ca76c57ab84ca31e429380a18d14f43`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T22:29:19.141Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-12-0118`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "RemTec International"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Ms. Patricia Burns"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "12-0118"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2012-08-15"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    171
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 2,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/54501"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "171.23",
    "171.23(a)(3)",
    "171.25",
    "171.25(d)",
    "107.701",
    "107.717",
    "171.12",
    "171.25d"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/17123",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/17125"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2012/120118.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2012/120118.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretations/2012/120118.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/12-0118-f610971404.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "da558bcb0ea8118be213cbebd3334543693f8c1d7c86b44e43a77cb2e90ece53",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/12-0118-f610971404.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "5b4b41e25d03cbaaa474561122286f81d342e7f9f48108ca3b6b562c4eea3df8",
      "pageCount": 3,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
