# TOM DOLCE Training Associates — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 13-0054  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2013-04-11

13-0054 response to TOM DOLCE Training Associates concerning 171.22, 173.120.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Ave, S.E.
Washington, D.C. 20590
APR 1 1 2013
Mr. Thomas Dolce
Principal Engineer
TOM DOLCE Training Associates
P.O. Box 7624
Warwick, RI 02887
Ref. No. 13-0054
Dear Mr. Dolce:
This responds to your February 18, 2013 letter requesting clarification of the classification
criteria for a Class 3 (flammable liquid) under the International Air Transport Association
(lATA) Dangerous Goods Regulations (lATA DGR) as they relate to the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180). In your letter, you describe a liquid
material with a flash point of 114 op that does not sustain combustion. Additionally for
reference, you provide correspondence with a representative of IAT A concerning this
subject and further clarification of the applicability of the flammable liquid classification
criteria under the International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code and the HMR.
It is your understanding that in accordance with the flammable liquid testing requirements
under the lATA DGR (see 3.3.1.3(a)), the material would not be subject to the provisions
ofthe lATA DGR. However, you are concerned that provisions 3.3.1.4 and 3.3.1.5 cause
the material to remain regulated as a Class 3 flammable liquid. Specifically, you are
concerned that although offered at a temperature below its flash point, during the course of
transportation conditions may be such that the temperature of the material may equal or
exceed its flash point, thus, causing the material to be considered a flammable liquid under
the lATA DGR.
The HMR authorize and provide conditions for use of international standards and
regulations in§ 171.22. The lATA DGR are not included among those authorized although
the International Civil Aviation Organization Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport
of Dangerous Goods by Air (ICAO TI) and the IMDG Code are authorized. Thus, we
cannot specifically address your concerns regarding the IA TA DGR.
However, for purposes of the HMR and in accordance with the flammable liquid definition
in § 173.120, a liquid with a flash point greater than 95°F that does not sustain combustion
according to test method ASTM D 4206 or the test procedure outlined in Appendix H of
Part 173 of the HMR is not defined as a flammable liquid (see §173.120(a) and (a)(3)).
Such a material is not subject to the requirements of the HMR as a flammable liquid even if

<<<PAGE 2>>>

temperature conditions during the course of transportation were to cause the material to
equal or exceed its flash point.
For purposes of the ICAO TI and in accordance with 3.1.2, a material meeting the
flammable liquid definition, which includes a liquid offered for transport at temperatures at
or above its flash point or a substance offered at an elevated temperature, is not considered a
flammable liquid under the ICAO TI if the material has passed a suitable combustibility test
(see 3.1.3(a)).
For purposes of the IMDG Code and in accordance with 2.3 .1.2, a material meeting the
flammable liquid definition, which includes a liquid offered for transport at temperatures at
or above its flash point or a substance offered at an elevated temperature, is not subject to
the provisions of the IMDG Code if the material has passed a suitable combustibility test
(see 2.3.1.3.1).
I hope this information is helpful. If you have further questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
ftk;?JJ! Robert Benedict
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

February 18, 20 13 .
Der- k1nderen
9172 .. /0 (
~I t3. fZo
t:lurnwt~k Li_r;els JTATA.
1~- D651
US Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Dear Sir/Madam:
I have a question regarding Class 3 Flammable Liquids that I would appreciate a formal letter of
interpretation on from your office. The question involves the air shipment of non-bulk packages
under the lATA Dangerous Goods Regulations which are authorized for use by 49 CFR 171 Subpart
C. I contacted lATA regarding the question and was informed that a formal letter of interpretation
must come from the Competent Authority in the country of origin (USDOT). The question follows:
I have a liquid with a flash point of 114 °F but does not sustain combustion per lATA DGR
3.3.1.3(a), and exhibits no other hazards. I therefore consider it not subject to the DGR. I ship it in
non-bulk packages and offer it for transportation at ambient temperature. I am concerned about
lATA DGR 3.3.1.4 and 3.3.1.5. Although I am offering the material for transportation at a
temperature below its flash point, I am concerned that during transportation (for example, in the back
of a truck on route to the airport) the temperature may equal or exceed the material's flashpoint.
Would it then become a Class 3 flammable liquid? A written interpretation on this matter would be
appreciated.
For your use, I am providing the following response I received from lATA. During a follow-up
telephone conversation with lATA after receiving the email, I was advised to request a formal
interpretation from USDOT.
Email received from IAT A
From: YMQ Dangerous Goods <gg_l]gopf!_@jgta~Q[g>
Date: January 6, 2013 10:08:16AM EST
To: Tom Dolce <tQ!!1ti.Ql£?1!X!i1J.ilJg@.v..gl19..Q&Qt!J>
Subject: RE: Question
Tom,
Apologies for the delayed response but I'm away from work over the
Christmas I New Year holidays.
If you meet the conditions set out in 3.3.1.3(a), (b) or (c) then
your substances is not regulated in transport as a flammable liquid.
I believe that once packaged then the provisions of 3.3.1.4 and
3.3.1.5 will not apply in air transport.

<<<PAGE 4>>>

February 18, 2013
Page2
Regards,
David BRENNAN
Asst. Director Cargo Safety & Standards
( +41-22-770-2947
2: +41-22-770-2686
*: /J.Ignn:PJ1t:f@jgJQ,Qrg
International Air Transport Association
33, Route de l'Aeroport
1215 Geneva 15 Airport
Switzerland
www. iata. orgl dangerous goods
Summary of Question
The liquid I am shipping has a flashpoint of 114 °F but meets the conditions ofiATA DGR 3.3.1.3(a)
and exhibits no other hazard class. I therefore consider it not subject to the DGR. It is offered in
non-bulk packages at ambient temperature (below 100 °F) for shipment by air following a ground
portion of the shipment to the airport.
The language in lATA DGR 3.3 .1.5 states "Substances that are transported or offered for transport
at elevated temperatures in a liquid state and which give off flammable vapour at a temperature at or
below the maximum transport temperature (i.e. the maximum temperature likely to be encountered by
the substance in transport) are also considered to be flammable liquids. "
In the back of the truck on route to the airport or possibly in the airplane, the temperature of the
material may rise and equal or exceed its flashpoint. Would it then become a Class 3 flammable
liquid and should it have been shipped as such?
For Shipments by Vessel
Since we may also ship this material by vessel under the IMDG Code, would your answer to the
above also apply to water shipments, including the highway portion on route to the port? The
applicable IMDG Code reference is 2.3.1.2.2.
For Domestic Shipments by Ground
We may also ship this material by ground under the DOT's HMR. It appears clear under 49 CFR
173.120(a) that we need not be concerned with this issue since we are not intentionally heating the
material and it is not being shipped in bulk packages. Could you please confirm our interpretation.
Fax 401 596-9675 TOffi DOL(~ Training Associates

<<<PAGE 5>>>

February 18, 2013
Page3
Please contact me if you require any additional clarification regarding my question and thank you for
your anticipated response.
Very truly yours,
rom DOLC~ Training Associates
Thomas J. Dolce, P.E., CET
Principal Engineer
Cell401 441-1431
Fax 401 596-9675 TOffi DQl(~ Training Associates

<<<PAGE 6>>>

Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA)
From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
Sent:
Friday, February 22, 2013 10:40 AM
To:
Drakeford, Carolyn (PHMSA)
Subject: FW: Question
Attachments: USDOT Question.pdf
Hi Carolyn}
We received the following request for a formal letter of interpretation.
Thanks}
Victoria
From: tom dolce [mailto]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 2:56 PM
To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
Subject: Question
Dear Info Center - Please refer to the attached question regarding Flammable Liquids. Please contact me if you
need any additional information.
Thank you,
Tom Dolce
401 441-1431
1

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2013/130054.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `a79142758ceadd3ab2cdcf225c987a98526ab6b5841b114671d36f0419e56acc`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-23T06:01:12.321Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-13-0054`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "TOM DOLCE Training Associates"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Thomas Dolce"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "13-0054"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2013-04-11"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    171,
    173
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 2,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/48206"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "171.22",
    "173.120"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/17122",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/173120"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2013/130054.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2013/130054.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2013/130054.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/13-0054-b9cd020bfe.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "2ca80d6e3c4aac390cfb393bed63fd951f674f0806a36ed848f62509ccf414e7",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/13-0054-b9cd020bfe.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "9b47485584bf40ef0b9d470e8ee311eabb0a175d9f905687ae97ae3f2050d706",
      "pageCount": 6,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
