# C&E Dot compliance Consultants LLC — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 13-0229  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2014-01-16

13-0229 response to C&E Dot compliance Consultants LLC concerning 171.26.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
JAN 1 6 2014
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, D.C. 20590
Mr. Christopher Widman
President
C&E DOT Compliance Consultants LLC
9465 Jefferson Street NE
Blaine, MN 55434
Ref. No.: 13-0229
Dear Mr. Widman:
This is in response to your email dated November 19, 2013, requesting clarification of the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) relating to the shipment of
Class 1 (explosive) material by vessel. You present a scenario where Class 1 material will be
shipped from the Czech Republic to Indonesia via the Port ofNorfolk, Virginia. The material
will not be imported into or transported on a public highway within the United States.
However, the material will be transloaded from one ship to another while in the Port of
Norfolk, Virginia. Your questions are paraphrased and answered as follows.
Q 1. Is a United States Competent Authority Approval required for entry into the Port of
Norfolk, Virginia even though the Class 1 material is not being imported into the United
States?
AI. HMR § 171.26(d) provides that Class 1 (explosive) material other than Division 1.1 and
1.2 passing through the United States in the course of being shipped between locations outside
the United States may be offered and accepted for transportation within a single port area
when packaged, marked, classed, labeled, stowed, and segregated in accordance with the
International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code. The shipment is subject to the
requirements of subparts C and F of part 172 of the HMR pertaining to shipping papers and
placarding, and must also conform to the applicable requirements of part 176 of the HMR
pertaining to carriage by vessel.
Chapter 2.1.3 .2 of the IMDG Code provides that prior to transportation all explosive
substances and articles must be approved by the competent authority of the country of
manufacture. The IMDG Code does not require explosive substances or articles to have a
competent authority approval from the country of destination or a country where transloading
operations occur.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Therefore, if the Class 1 material being shipped is not Division 1.1 or 1.2, a United States
Competent Authority Approval is not required for entry into and transloading at the Port of
Norfolk, Virginia. If the material is classed as Division 1.1 or 1.2 then a United States
Competent Authority Approval from the Associate Administrator of the Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) is required.
Q2. What are the HMR and International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code
regulations relating to Competent Authority Approval requirements for shipping Class 1
material in United States ports?
A2. See AI.
I trust this i1;1formation is helpful. If you have further questions, please do not hesitate to
contact this office.
Sincerely,
~::::: A.?f-J
International Standards Coordinator
Standards and Rulemaking Division
-----
------~---~-·

<<<PAGE 3>>>

'BaJJ·, c/11
~178· pto
t)(p lest ves
l3 -() 22 q
11/19/2013
U.S. DOT
PHMSA Oftice of Hazardous
Attn: PHH-10
East Building
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.
Washington. DC 20590-0001
Subject: Approvals required when Trans~shipping Class l Materials in US Ports.
Regulations affected: 49 CFR § 173.56 (Estimated)
Dear Standards
My customer in the Czech Republic wishes to ship Class 1 materials (explosives) to Indonesia
via the Port of Norfolk VA.
They have a valid Czech RepubUc Competent Aufhodty.
They wish to Trant!Hihip the Class l material~ in Pott
The materials will not be hnporred into the
within the US.
Nor wm they be transported on ,a highway
The Class 1 materials wm enter the pmt of Norfolk and itmnediately re·C~)nsignr.Al to another
ship in the port of Norfolk VA.
Q 1) Is my customer in the Czech Republic required to obtain a US DOT Competent Authority
for the purpose of authorizing entry into to the port of Norfolk even when the Class l materials
will never be imported into the US?
Q2) I am unable to locate any 49 CFR or IMDG requirements for trans-shipping of Class 1
materials as they relate to US Competent Authorities. Can you please identify the 49 CFR or
IMDG regulations that relate to Competent Authority requirements for trans-shipping Class 1
materials in US ports?
Regards, . n .
G~"' f) Lv i-dL/Wtc.~
Christop~er Widman
President
C&E DOT Compliance Consultants LL(~
9465 Jefferson St NE
Blaine MN 55434
Telephone: (763) 355~5097

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2013/130229.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `b3c47ea027335fcf44f5fc47b92d6e61412a17b96dc365b35aca5c6cdb050fa6`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T04:04:51.049Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-13-0229`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "C&E Dot compliance Consultants LLC"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Christopher Widman"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "13-0229"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2014-01-16"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    171
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/50456"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "171.26",
    "171.26(d)",
    "173.56"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/17126"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2013/130229.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2013/130229.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2013/130229.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/13-0229-5626cb3ab1.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "4cf541e0c8de65bee19e2b26be3fd4582e34917d15c1c90b06fba72b2727a8e0",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/13-0229-5626cb3ab1.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "ce7c6e107fdf17ba40423629074041a7834f502b8502213cfe5dc775b2f1febf",
      "pageCount": 3,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
