# Inmark Packaging, Inc. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 15-0154  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2016-02-01

15-0154 response to Inmark Packaging, Inc. concerning 173.199, 178.609.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
Washington. DC 20590
Pipeline and Hazardous
Administration
Materials Safety
FEB 01. 2015
Mr. Jay Johnson
Regulatory Compliance Manager
Inmark Packaging, Inc.
675 Hartman Road, Suite 100
Austell, GA 30168
Reference No. 15-0154
Dear Mr. Johnson:
This is in response to your July 27, 2015 email and subsequent telephone conversation with a
member of my staff concerning packaging requirements for Category B infectious substances
contained in the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR: 49 CFR Parts 171-180).
Specifically, you ask whether a Category B packaging is required to meet the conditions
specified in §S 178.609(e) and 178.609(f) for water spray and cold conditioning, respectively,
before subjecting the packaging to the drop test in § 178.609(d).
As specified in § 173.199(a)(4), a Category B packaging must be capable of successfully
passing the drop test in § 178.609(d) at a drop height of at least 1.2 meters (3.9 feet) but is not
required to be tested using this method. Further, as stated in the preamble to a final rule
issued under Docket No. PHMSA-2004-16895 (71 FR 32244), a § 173.199 packaging need
not be capable of passing a puncture or other performance tests. Therefore, the HMR do not
require that a Category B infectious substance packaging be subjected to the conditions
prescribed in §§ 178.609(e) and 178.609(f) in preparation for the drop test prescribed in
§ 178.609(d).
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact this office if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Done A. Pad
Duane A. Pfund
International Standards Coordinator
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 2>>>

".
Suchat
$/73.199
Dodd, Alice (PHMSA)
Catagory В сприном
substances
From:
Foster, Glenn (PHMSA)
15-0154
Sent:
Tuesday, July 28, 2015 8:33 AM
To:
Dodd, Alice (PHMSA); Goodall, Shante CTR (PHMSA)
Subject:
Question about Category B Infectious Packaging
Alice and Shante,
Please check in the email below as a request for letter of interpretation.
Thanks,
Glenn
From: Foster, Glenn (PHMSA)
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 7:40 AM
To: 'Jay Johnson'
Cc: Betts, Charles (PHMSA); Supko, Ben (PHMSA)
Subject: RE: Question about Category B Infectious Packaging
Hello Jay,
Your inquiry below will be logged in as a request for Interpretation and responded accordingly.
Thanks,
Glenn
From: Jay Johnson [mailto:jayj@inmarkinc.com]
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2015 4:42 PM
To: Foster, Glenn (PHMSA)
Cc: Betts, Charles (PHMSA); Supko, Ben (PHMSA)
Subject: RE: Question about Category B Infectious Packaging
Hello Glenn,
While you are working on this, I have another question on 173.199 package performance capability.
Does Category B packaging that is being dropped according to 178.609(d) subject to the cold conditioning and water
spray conditioning as defined in 178.609(b) and 178.609(c)?
Kind Regards,
Jay Johnson, DGSA | Regulatory Compliance Manager
SAF\PAK™
Inmark i
AN Inmarkyl COMPANY
1

<<<PAGE 3>>>

E
EXAKT-PAK®
DO SUPPLIES
AN INMARK BRAND
675 Hartman Road, Suite 100 Austell GA 30168
0 770-373-3300 | d 770-373-3356 | m770-377-0205 | f770-373-3357 | e jayi@inmarkpackaging.com
Follow us at:
Visit our website or InmarkPackaging.com to learn more about our products and services.
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
Confidentiality Notice:
transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.
From: Glenn.Foster@dot.gov [mailto:Glenn.Foster@dot.gov]
To: Jay Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 11:48 AM
Cc: charles.betts@dot.gov; Ben. Supko@dot.gov
Subject: RE: Question about Category B Infectious Packaging
Jay,
In the meantime, here is a PDF of the NPRM under HM-218 "Miscellaneous Amendments" where the revision was
proposed. I will have the final rule forwarded to you when it is published, as well.
Thanks,
Glenn
From: Foster, Glenn (PHMSA)
To: 'Jay Johnson'
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 10:56 AM
Cc: Betts, Charles (PHMSA); Supko, Ben (PHMSA)
Subject: FW: Question about Category B Infectious Packaging
Hello Jay,
Thanks for the follow-up. Our plan is to include this revision in an upcoming rulemaking. We will send you a
notification/link to the rule when it is published.
Thanks,
Glenn
From: Jay Johnson [mailto:jayj@inmarkinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 6:21 AM
To: Betts, Charles (PHMSA); Supko, Ben (PHMSA)
Subject: FW: Question about Category B Infectious Packaging
Hello Ben and Charles,
2

<<<PAGE 4>>>

I am curious how things are progressing with two questions | asked Del Billings back in 2011
Has there been any changes regarding this topic?
Thanks
Jay Johson
Inmark
From: Jay Johnson
To: 'delmer.billings@dot.gov'
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 12:21 PM
Subject: Question about Category B Infectious Packaging
Hello Del,
I have two questions about the package testing for Biological Substance, Category B and I hope you
can help me with this. Currently §§173.199(a)(4) states that packages must be capable of
successfully passing the drop tests in §§178.609(d) and (h) of this subchapter.
173.199(a)(4) The completed package must be designed, constructed, maintained, filled, its contents
limited, and closed so that under conditions normally encountered in transportation, including removal
from a pallet or overpack for subsequent handling, there will be no release of hazardous material into
the environment. Package effectiveness must not be substantially reduced for minimum and
maximum temperatures, changes in humidity and pressure, and shocks, loadings and vibrations
normally encountered during transportation. The packaging must be capable of successfully passing
the drop tests in §§178.609(d) and (h) of this subchapter at a drop height of at least 1.2 meters (3.9
feet). Following the drop tests, there must be no leakage from the primary receptacle, which must
remain protected by absorbent material, when required, in the secondary packaging. At least one
surface of the outer packaging must have a minimum dimension of 100mm by 100 mm (3.9 inches).
PHMSA clarified this requirements in an interpretation (PHMSA Interpretation #07-0018 ) that:
A packaging used to transport a Category B infectious substance must be capable of passing the
drop test prescribed in § 178.609(d). The packaging is not required to also be capable of passing the
steel rod impact test in § 178.609(h). We will correct this error in a future rulemaking.
Question 1: Do you know when the rulemaking to correct this error is going to occur?
Question 2: When conduction the drop testing in §§178.609(d) to establish if the packages are
capable of passing the drop test, do the samples have to be conditioned as described in the
requirements of §$178.609(e), §§178.609(f), and §$178.609(g)?
§§178.609(e) The samples must be subjected to a water spray to simulate exposure to rainfall of
approximately 50 mm (2 inches) per hour for at
least one hour. They must then be subjected to the test described in paragraph (d) of this section.
§§178.609(f) The sample must be conditioned in an atmosphere of -18 [deg]C (0 [deg]F) or less for a
period of at least 24 hours and within 15 minutes
of removal from that atmosphere be subjected to the test described in paragraph (d) of this section.
Where the sample contains dry ice, the
conditioning period may be reduced to 4 hours.
3

<<<PAGE 5>>>

§$178.609(g) Where packaging is intended to contain dry ice, a test additional to that specified in
paragraph (d) or (e) or (f) of this
section must be carried out. One sample must be stored so that all the dry ice dissipates and then be
subjected to the test described in
paragraph (d) of this section.
Thanks for your clarification on the matter.
Best regards,
Jay Johnson DGSA, Regulatory Compliance Manager | Inmark | 675 Hartman Road, Suite 100, Austell, GA 30168|
www.inmarkinc.com
main: 770.373.3300 | direct: 770.373.3356| direct fax: 770.373.3357| cellular: 770.377.0205 jayi@inmarkinc.com |
This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications
Confidentiality Notice:
Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of this
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission
message. This transmission, and any attachments, may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended
is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Please contact us immediately by return e-mail or at +1-770-373-3300 and destroy the
original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2016/150154.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `0605520fefebd258d45af83f16f3d2773c12ddfbf488ea5af396d2763d751ada`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-24T09:23:02.571Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-15-0154`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Inmark Packaging, Inc."
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Jay Johnson"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "15-0154"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2016-02-01"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    173,
    178
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 2,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/56381"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "173.199",
    "173.199(a)(4)",
    "178.609",
    "178.609(e)"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/173199",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/178609"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2016/150154.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2016/150154.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/2016/150154.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/15-0154-7aacf3d712.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "d3c1ee535d1f8c940164dfc87c067cd774a89706e4af53397421ba3aafd3b489",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/15-0154-7aacf3d712.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "a1bb43d187ee87b0ba1f18fe2fd966c7cd63f80ae9cf8496b59af5d067e32198",
      "pageCount": 5,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
