# Westmor Industries, LLC — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 19-0025R  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2025-12-22

19-0025R response to Westmor Industries, LLC concerning 178.337.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
December 22, 2025
Robbie Dunn, P.E.
Westmor Industries, LLC
3 Development Drive
Morris, MN 56267
Reference No. 19-0025R
Dear Mr. Dunn:
This letter is in response to your March 4, 2019 email and a meeting on May 19, 2025, with
members of the Standards and Rulemaking Division, requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to the transportation of propane
in a specification MC 331 cargo tank motor vehicle (bobtail). After further review, Reference
No. 19-0025 has been superseded by this revised letter.
You describe a scenario where propane deliveries require drivers to reverse into unfamiliar
locations to complete the delivery of propane to customers. This presents safety concerns due to
limited visibility and blind spots. As such, you are considering mounting a reel to the front of the
bobtail chassis. Furthermore, you state that due to variations in chassis design or lack of
structural support at the front of the bobtail chassis, you want to avoid installing a protection
device. Based on the design drawing that was submitted, is the proposed configuration allowed
by the HMR?
No. While there is not a restriction against mounting the hose reel and piping to the front of the
MC 331 chassis, § 178.337-10(a) requires “[a]ll valves, fittings, pressure relief devices, and other
accessories to the tank proper shall be protected in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section
against such damage as could be caused by collision with other vehicles or objects. . .”
Furthermore, in accordance with § 178.337-10(f)(2), each internal self-closing stop valve, excess
flow valve, and check valve must be shielded by a shear section or other sacrificial device.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

This protection device must be placed in the piping system outboard of the stop valve and within
the accident damage protection device to prevent any accidental loss of lading. Based on the
information and attachments provided, your design would not meet the accident damage
protection requirements prescribed in § 178.337-10.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Dirk DerKinderen
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

From: Andrews, Steven (PHMSA)
To: Christopher Wagner; Benjamin Nussdorf
Cc: Baker, Yul (PHMSA); DerKinderen, Dirk (PHMSA); Nickels, Matthew (PHMSA)
Subject: RE: Update on NPGA/PHMSA Questions
Date: Monday, May 12, 2025 18:10:25
Attachments: image002.png
image003.png
image004.png
Chris/Ben,
I blocked off a 2pm on Thursday slot on teams to discuss this letter. Does that work for you all?
Thanks
Steven
From: Christopher Wagner <cwagner@npga.org>
Sent: Monday, May 5, 2025 5:23 PM
To: Andrews, Steven (PHMSA) <steven.andrews@dot.gov>; Benjamin Nussdorf
<bnussdorf@npga.org>; Patrick, Eamonn (PHMSA) <eamonn.patrick@dot.gov>; Foster, Glenn
(PHMSA) <Glenn.Foster@dot.gov>
Cc: DerKinderen, Dirk (PHMSA) <Dirk.DerKinderen@dot.gov>
Subject: RE: Update on NPGA/PHMSA Questions
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do
not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Hi Steven,
Apologies for the delayed response. Below is the crux of the matter:
By our understanding the March 4, 2019 request for interpretation, submitted by Westmoor
Industries, LLC that received a response on September 12, 2019 was seeking an understanding
related to accident damage protection as specified in 49 CFR 178.337 (a), (b), (c), and (e) for the
purposes of seeking an exclusion for front end protection when installing metered delivery
plumbing. A standard configuration includes piping, valves, meter and permanently installed hose
within a hose reel mounted on the tailboard of the vehicle. This tailboard is protected by a rear
bumper designed to protect the cargo tank and all valves, piping and fittings located at the rear of
the cargo tank. Vehicles in metered delivery service are not capable of removing residual propane
from the hose and piping used for delivery. This is due to the method of sale of metered gallons to
the consumer and the container filling process. A container in stationary service is filled by volume
using the fixed maximum liquid level gage. This is an outage gage located on the container that
emits liquid when filled. If the delivery hose continues to dispense following emission of liquid a
container will by design be overfilled. If the remaining liquid is discharged to atmosphere, the
consumer will be billed for 10 gallons they did not receive.
I am unaware of any regulation that specifically prohibits retaining LP Gas in the metered service

<<<PAGE 4>>>

delivery piping. For the actual rule prohibiting transportation of hazardous materials in loading or
unloading lines located on the bottom portion of cargo tanks that are exposed to vehicle collision is
listed in 49 CFR 173.33(e) but is limited to 5.1, 5.2, 6.1 and 8 hazardous materials without damage
protection. In every case where a bobtail transports propane it is equipped with crash protection of
the piping. This crash protection includes the frame rails of the vehicle, wheels and fenders, and the
ICC bumper on the rear. All piping, hose and fittings are protected consistently with the 2004 and
2009 RSPA dockets.
For additional context as to the areas of potential conflicts generated by Paragraph Three of the
Westmoor Interpretation, I cite the following:
• 49 CFR 173.33(e) states - DOT specification cargo tanks used for the transportation of
any material that is a Division 6.1 (poisonous liquid) material, oxidizer liquid, liquid
organic peroxide or corrosive liquid (corrosive to skin only) may not be transported with
hazardous materials lading retained in the piping, unless the cargo tank motor vehicle is
equipped with bottom damage protection devices meeting the requirements of §
178.337-10 or § 178.345-8(b) of this subchapter, or the accident damage protection
requirements of the specification under which it was manufactured. This requirement
does not apply to a residue which remains after the piping is drained. A sacrificial device
(see § 178.345-1 of this subchapter) may not be used to satisfy the accident damage
protection requirements of this paragraph.
· MC-331 cargo tank motor vehicles in metered delivery service meet the afore
mentioned requirements as listed in § 178.337-10 and § 178.345-8(b)
• In 2004, Docket No. RSPA-99-6223 (HM-213B), while evaluating a proposed
modification to existing wet line allowances for flammable liquid haulers established that
the frame members on straight truck chassis carrying hazardous materials constituted
bottom damage protection
• In 2009, Docket No. PHMSA-2009-0303 (HM-213D) admitted that loads that were in
metered delivery should be excluded as there is no mechanism for recovery and
reimbursement of gallons that flow through a meter leading to overcharging of
consumers.
• Propane bobtails in metered delivery service have up to 150’ of permanently attached
hose connected to the rear of a vehicle stored within a hose reel above the vehicles
frame and rear end protection. All additional piping associated with the transfer system
is located between the frame rails of the vehicle terminating at an automatically
reclosing internal valve.
• 49 CFR 173.315 (i)(11) creates specific obligations for each portion of connected liquid
piping or hose for compressed gases that is shipped in cargo tanks and that can be
closed at both ends trapping liquid, that hydrostatic pressure relief equipment be
installed. This section further substantiates that liquid is expected to be transported in
certain cargo tank piping such as that connected to the metered delivery piping and
hose system on MC-331 cargo tanks transporting liquefied petroleum gas.
Please let us know how to proceed. Thanks.

<<<PAGE 5>>>

CHRISTOPHER J WAGNER
Vice President of Codes, Standards, & Safety
NATIONAL PROPANE GAS ASSOCIATION
1140 Connecticut Ave NW, Ste 1075
Washington, DC 20036 USA
202-466-7202 DIRECT
610-308-3822 MOBILE
www.NPGA.org

<<<PAGE 6>>>

fboJuu-r
, 9-oo s cf
Dodd, Alice (PHMSA)
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Stevens, Michael (PHMSA)
Monday, March 04, 2019 9:53 AM
Robbie Dunn
Foster, Glenn (PHMSA); Hazmat Interps
RE: Code compliance for new product
Good Morning Mr. Dunn,
I will have your request for compliance verification entered into our system. It will be evaluated by our engineering
department and a written response will be provided to you.
Sincerely,
Michael Stevens
From: Robbie Dunn [mailto:robbie.dunn@westmor-ind.com]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 9:25 AM
To: Stevens, Michael (PHMSA) <michael.stevens@dot.gov>
Subject: Code compliance for new product
Michael, I'm looking for some guidance on a new product that we're developing to help our customers deliver
Propane safer on an MC33 l bobtail. I wanted to send you some background information and some diagrams to
look at, then I was hoping to call you or if your not the correct contact that you could point me in the right
direction. If it works better I'm willing to meet in person also.
The intent of the design is for public safety. When propane deliveries are made the opera.tor has to back into an
unknown location for the delivery. When backing up you have safety concerns with the limited visibility and
blind spots. We've been selling backup camera's to help, but they get dirty and hard to see out of, and the
screens are small. We're looking at mounting a reel to the front of the bobtail, in much the same manner as you
might see on a fire truck. I've attached a few diagrams illustrating the concept. We've calculated less than 10
gallons of product in the piping and reel. Due to chassis variations, lack of chassis structure at the front we'd
like to avoid putting a protection device around the reel. We believe it is acceptable to have up to 119 gallons
of a hazmat product and not be considered bulk. We believe the question is what is needed to isolate the
product remainingin the reel and piping from the rest of the bulk product, for it to be looked at on it's
own. Would DOT consider the internal valve on the tank along with a secondary valve followed by a shelil'
section be enough isolation to consider the 10 gallons independently? If not I wan't to explore other options,
I would like to talk to you or someone on this design idea, if you are the correct person to talk to what would be
the best number to reach you at?
Regards,
Robbie Dunn, P .E.

<<<PAGE 7>>>

Chief Engineer
Westmor [ndustries, LLC
3 Development Drive
Morris, MN 56267
United States
P: (320} 589-7250
E: robbie.dunn@westmor-ind.com
2

<<<PAGE 8>>>

WESTMOR

<<<PAGE 9>>>

13' OF 1.5 PIPING =
1.37 GALLONS
150' OF 1" HOSE
= 6.12 GALLONS
PRODUCT IN REEL = 1 GALLONS
PROOUCT PUMP •
AIR ACTUAlED VN.VE TO
ISOLATE DOWNSTREAM
PIPING WHILE IN TRANSIT
•
• SHEAA SECTION
THERE Will BE UP TO 10 GALLONS OF UOUID
PETROLEUM DOWN STREAM Of THE ISOIATION VN.VE IN
THE PIPING ANO DEl:JV£RY HOSE
THE FRONT DEI..NERY REEL W1ll NJ.(NI DRIVERS TO SAfrrY PUll
INTO DRIVEWAYS RAl'HER '!HAN BACKING INTO DRIVEWAYS WITH
LIMITED \1SIBILOY.

<<<PAGE 10>>>

PRODUCT METER
PRODUCT PUMP
TODO DN50 COUPLING
THERE WILL BE UP TO 10 GALLONS OF LIQUID
PETROLEUM DOWN STREAM OF THE DRY BREAK COUPLER
IN THE PIPING AND DELIVERY HOSE
THE FRONT DELIVERY REEL WILL ALLOW DRIVERS TO SAFELY PULL
INTO DRIVEWAYS RATHER THAN BACKING INTO DRIVEWAYS WITH
LIMITED VISIBILITY.
PRODUCT DELIVERY REEL HOLDS
150' OF DELIVERY HOSE.

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2026-01/190025R.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `18fe60d6b6b11a28f8d5a4989588b46793e68dd714c01dcce3f4a6a78659ad35`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T10:53:51.142Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-19-0025r`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Westmor Industries, LLC"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Robbie Dunn, P.E."
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "19-0025R"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2025-12-22"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    178
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/80856"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "178.337",
    "173.33(e)",
    "178.345",
    "173.315"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/178337-10"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2026-01/190025R.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2026-01/190025R.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2026-01/190025R.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/19-0025r-0232abd83f.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "1ae7678ece699b1a68db3bb85a99a94c4efcb46a8b1b819a84dc094ed6e0e731",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/19-0025r-0232abd83f.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "f70f621ecdce0d7c4ea3746dd3abc41945b7e79a71116420bfc64c9bc9cf6970",
      "pageCount": 10,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
