# Shanghai Research Institute of Chemical Industry Testing Company, Ltd. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 22-0032  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2022-07-21

22-0032 response to Shanghai Research Institute of Chemical Industry Testing Company, Ltd. concerning 173.22.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
July 21, 2022
Bin Fan
Senior Engineer
Shanghai Research Institute of Chemical Industry Testing Company, Ltd.
No. 2779 Guangfu West Road, Putuo District
Shanghai, China
Reference No. 22-0032
Dear Ms. Fan:
This letter is in response to your April 10, 2022, email requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to the classification and
description of an e-cigarette that contains a lithium ion battery. You provided four photographs
illustrating the e-cigarette and other equipment and ask questions on how to properly classify and
describe the product for purposes of packaging, hazard communication, and transportation.
We have paraphrased and answered your questions as follows:
Q1. You ask whether the e-cigarette packaged together with a charger should be described as
“Lithium ion batteries packed with equipment”—which is subject to packing instruction
(PI) 966 in accordance with the International Civil Aviation Organization Technical
Instructions (ICAO TI) on the Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air—or should the
e-cigarette packaged together with a charger be described as “Lithium ion batteries”
subject to PI 965 in accordance with the ICAO TI.
A1. Please note, in accordance with § 173.22, it is the shipper’s responsibility to properly
classify and describe a hazardous material, as this Office does not perform that function.
Furthermore, in accordance with § 173.185 of the HMR, the term “equipment” is defined
as the device or apparatus for which the lithium cells or batteries provide electrical power
for its operation. For example, a charger (i.e., a spare battery) may provide power to an e-
cigarette (i.e., equipment).
Q2. Since the e-cigarette and charger can be shipped separately and because the charger and
e-cigarette both contain a lithium ion battery, you ask how to describe each component
when they are transported in separate packages.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

A2. Ultimately, it is the shipper’s responsibility to properly classify and describe a hazardous
material, but it is the opinion of this office that an e-cigarette packaged and shipped
without the charger should be described as “UN3481, Lithium ion batteries contained in
equipment including lithium ion polymer batteries, 9” and shipped accordingly. If the
charger is packaged and shipped without the e-cigarette, it should be described as
“UN3480, Lithium ion batteries including lithium ion polymer batteries, 9” and shipped
accordingly.
Q3. You ask if the material contains a heating rod, a battery management unit (BMU), and a
lithium ion battery—with no atomizer—can you describe the material as equipment or a
charger. In addition, you ask if the atomizer was integrated in the e-cigarette, could you
consider the e-cigarette as “equipment” since the lithium ion battery from the e-cigarette
provides electricity to the atomizer.
A3. If the device contains no atomizer, it would be considered “UN3480, Lithium ion
batteries including lithium ion polymer batteries, 9” for shipping purposes. If the device
contains an atomizer, it would be described as “UN3481, Lithium ion batteries contained
in equipment including lithium ion polymer batteries, 9.”
Q4. You ask if the e-cigarette contains both a flammable liquid component and a lithium ion
battery, what is the appropriate description and classification for purposes of shipping.
A4. It is the shipper’s responsibility to properly classify and describe a hazardous material;
yet, it is the opinion of this Office that an e-cigarette powered by a lithium ion battery
and containing a flammable liquid component may potentially be classified and
described as “UN3540, Articles containing flammable liquid, n.o.s., 3.” Because the
classification and description of a hazardous material are dependent on the type and
quantity of material; absent more specific information, it is difficult to specify the most
appropriate classification and description for equipment having both a flammable liquid
component and a miscellaneous hazard component (e.g., a lithium ion battery).
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Dirk Der Kinderen
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Baker
22-0032
From: Foster, Glenn (PHMSA)
To: Subject: Date: Dodd, Alice (PHMSA); Hillman, Kenetha CTR (PHMSA)
FW: Problems on Classification of E-cigarette
Wednesday, April 20, 2022 12:26:41 PM
Attachments: E-cigarette-0420.docx
Alice and Kenetha,
Can you of you process this as a request for a LOI and assign, please?
Thanks,
Glenn
From: Leary, Kevin (PHMSA) <Kevin.Leary@dot.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2022 11:54 AM
To: Kelley, Shane (PHMSA) <shane.kelley@dot.gov>; DerKinderen, Dirk (PHMSA)
<Dirk.DerKinderen@dot.gov>; Foster, Glenn (PHMSA) <Glenn.Foster@dot.gov>
Cc: Nickels, Matthew (PHMSA) <Matthew.Nickels@dot.gov>; Pfund, Duane (PHMSA)
<Duane.Pfund@dot.gov>
Subject: FW: Problems on Classification of E-cigarette
Hi Shane, I recommend processing this as an interp request. I know PHMSA has issued some letters
about lithium battery powered devices and charging cases e.g. ear buds but the other questions
posed in the attached look like they go beyond what we have already written. Considering the
scenario specific nature of the letter and the modal (air) references I think it best to develop a
coordinated response.
Kevin
From: 范宾 <fb@ghs.cn>
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2022 6:56 AM
To: Kelley, Shane (PHMSA) <shane.kelley@dot.gov>; Leary, Kevin (PHMSA) <Kevin.Leary@dot.gov>
Subject: Problems on Classification of E-cigarette
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do
not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Dear Shane and
We are from Shanghai Research Institute of Chemical Industry Testing Co., Ltd, and met you at TDG
meeting in Geneva or on line. I hope this email finds you well.
We are now experiencing a lockdown in Shanghai because of the pandemic COVID-19, but,
fortunately, it seems that things are getting better recently.
I am writing to ask your opinions on the classification of some e-cigarette products, as you can
find in the attached document.

<<<PAGE 4>>>

Recently, there is an increasing amount of e-cigarettes transported to and from Mainland
China,including those new ones listed in the document, which we cannot come to an agreement
on how they should be classified. We have heard from the industry that about 60% of e-cigarettes
produced in China will be exported to the United States, so we would like to know how US experts
classify such products. It would be highly appreciated if you could help.
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
--
范宾 Fanbin
教授级高工 Senior Engineer
e-mail: fb@ghs.cn
公司(Company)： 上海化工院检测有限公司 Shanghai Research Institute of
Chemical Industry Testing Co., Ltd,
地址(Adress)：上海市云岭东路345号
电话(Tel)：31015112
网址(website)：www.ghs.cn

<<<PAGE 5>>>

Issue 1:
Electronic cigarette set (picture as below)
The set contains the cigarette itself and a charger which can charge the E-cigarette. It is quite
similar to the Bluetooth earbuds. The charger can also store power in the lithium battery inside
it and provide the power to the cigarette. For the Bluetooth earbuds, it is informed that
earbuds set can be classified as PI966. Then how about this kind of set? Can the charger which
shipped together with the cigarette in the set also be classified as PI966? Or we must define
it as a power bank and classify it as PI965.
Issue 2:
Sectional part of the E-cigarette may also be shipped separately. We met different and
complex situation. As picture below shows, it is a heating rod with BMU（Battery Management
Unit） and lithium battery. There is no atomizer in it. How can we define it in this way?
Equipment or simply charger?

<<<PAGE 6>>>

battery BMU/PCBA
If the atomizer is integrated with it, can we classify it as an equipment since the battery
provides the electricity to the atomizer and makes it work?
1
2 3
1: atomizer 2: BMU/PCBA 3: battery
Issue 3
As we know, the main contents of the cartridge are glycerol and propylene glycol, which are
not flammable. But there are exceptions. If the oil in the cartridge of E-cigarette contains
flammable liquids and be shipped with the lithium battery in one article, which UN No. will
be more suitable? We understand for the cartridge (containing flammable liquids) alone it
shall be UN3363 and for the lithium battery alone it shall be UN3480 or UN3481. If these
two kinds of miscellaneous dangerous goods were put together in an article, how can we
classify it? Shall we assign it UN3548? Then the goods will be forbidden in air transport.

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/76656/220032_2.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `dbd2deb5d5fa4d9289085d4a4e6b0572806570d12757c54362bdd0590b34559e`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T14:24:48.305Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-22-0032`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Shanghai Research Institute of Chemical Industry Testing Company, Ltd."
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Bin Fan"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "22-0032"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2022-07-21"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    173
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/73256"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "173.22",
    "173.185"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/17322"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/76656/220032_2.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/76656/220032_2.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/76656/220032_2.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/22-0032-54acaf8e0a.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "0c15e9c7ebcab2a2cac33c7e871f0fb17af6c9a2fc8f55d847cfa8c58037edd0",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/22-0032-54acaf8e0a.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "e436712272ae8d8b77762493c0e20e06711510faf5604b4b924869513a460e87",
      "pageCount": 6,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
