# DOT Safety Solutions — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 22-0033  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2023-05-16

22-0033 response to DOT Safety Solutions concerning 180.401, 180.403, 180.407.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
May 16, 2023
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Randy Decker
DOT Safety Solutions
PO Box 25311
Overland Park, KS 66225
Reference No. 22-0033
Dear Mr. Decker:
This letter is in response to your April 19, 2022, email requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to qualification and
maintenance of cargo tanks. Specifically, you describe a scenario where crude oil is transported
in cargo tanks made of aluminum; you state that, as a registered inspector, you have firsthand
experience that the crude oil transported in the region of service can be and is corrosive to an
aluminum tank. You ask who is responsible for making the determination that the cargo tank was
transporting a material that was corrosive to the cargo tank or valve.
In accordance with § 180.401, the requirements in Part 180, Subpart E for the qualification and
maintenance of cargo tanks apply to any person responsible for the continuing qualification,
maintenance, or periodic testing of a cargo tank. In § 180.403, corrosive to the tank or valve
means that the lading has been shown through experience or test data to reduce the thickness of
the material of construction of the tank wall or valve. Thus, if the crude oil in the region of
service has been shown through experience or test data to reduce the thickness of the material of
construction of the tank wall or valve, then the cargo tank must be subjected to the testing and
inspection regimen for associated cargo tanks transporting lading corrosive to the tank found in
§ 180.407(c).
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Dirk Der Kinderen
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 2>>>

From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
To: Dodd, Alice (PHMSA)
Cc: Hazmat Interps
Subject: FW: 180.403 clarification
Date: Wednesday, April 20, 2022 2:03:16 PM
Attachments: image006.png
image007.png
image008.png
Cardez
22-0033
Hello Alice,
Please see the below interpretation request.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Regards,
-Breanna
From: Randy Decker <randydecker@dottrainingsolutions.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 1:25 PM
To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) <INFOCNTR.INFOCNTR@dot.gov>
Subject: RE: 180.403 clarification
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do
not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
180.403
Corrosive to the tank or valve means that the lading has been shown through experience or test data
to reduce the thickness of the material of construction of the tank wall or valve.
I have had owners tell me that crude oil wasn’t corrosive. From experience as an RI testing Crude
trailer’s, I know that crude product is corrosive to an aluminum tank in this area.
Question: I as the RI, tell the owner or the tank that the crude in this area is corrosive to his tank and
I must do an internal, PRD test, and a liner inspection (if lined) annually and a thickness test every
two years if unlined. The owner says it’s not in corrosive service and not to do the additional test.
Who’s right and if the owner is correct, does this relieve the responsibilities from the RI? Can the RI
supersede what the owner says in this case?

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Crude residue sat in this Alum. DOT 407 unlined for 6 months.
Please respond by email and or by mail to PO Box 25311 Overland Park, KS 66225
Thank you
Randy Decker
Safety Consultant
Mobile: (913) 350-0373|Toll Free: (866) 296-7394
Email: randydecker@dottrainingsolutions.com
Website: https://dottrainingsolutions.com
From: Randy Decker
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2022 3:44 PM
To: Infocntr@dot.gov
Subject: 180.403 clarification
I have had owners tell me that crude oil wasn’t corrosive. From past experience as an RI, I know that
crude oil is corrosive to an aluminum tank.
Question: I as the RI, tell the owner or the tank that the crude is corrosive to his tank and I must do

<<<PAGE 4>>>

an internal, PRD test, and a liner inspection (if lined) annually. The owner says it’s not in corrosive
service and not to do the additional test. Who’s right and if the owner is correct, does this relieve
the responsibility’s from the RI?
Randy Decker
Safety Consultant
Mobile: (913) 350-0373|Toll Free: (866) 296-7394
Email: randydecker@dottrainingsolutions.com
Website: https://dottrainingsolutions.com

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77581/220033.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `2943a78d1054ec57a944d8a4e0c428396d15bef068990d1832225e3f765384d4`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-23T05:13:14.222Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-22-0033`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "DOT Safety Solutions"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Randy Decker"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "22-0033"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2023-05-16"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    180
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 3,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/73696"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "180.401",
    "180.403",
    "180.407",
    "180.407(c)"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/180401",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/180403",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/180407"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77581/220033.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77581/220033.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77581/220033.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/22-0033-823f19cdca.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "505b6985115c113f58a596b2548211104db02ab025a0ee6aae01e0a649d3c2ac",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/22-0033-823f19cdca.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "37ad0aaa51fb32e2a95170f2b10911a8b2b9c83ea3d2e387b770b03b5bf3a5c0",
      "pageCount": 4,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
