# Scopelitis, Gavin, Light, Hanson & Feary, P.C. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 22-0070  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2023-08-22

22-0070 response to Scopelitis, Gavin, Light, Hanson & Feary, P.C. concerning 173.197.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
August 22, 2023
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Mr. Timothy W. Wiseman
Partner
Scopelitis, Gavin, Light, Hanson & Feary, P.C.
10 West Market Street, Suite 1400
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Reference No. 22-0070
Dear Mr. Wiseman:
This is in response to your July 14, 2022, letter requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to the transportation of used
sharps. Specifically, you ask about a plastic film bag used as an inner packaging when
transporting sharps in a Large Packaging.
We have paraphrased and answered your questions as follows:
Q1. In your letter, you note that § 173.197(e)(3) of the HMR specifies that sharps transported
in a Large Packaging must be packaged in a puncture-resistant, non-bulk inner packaging
(sharps container)—which in your opinion may be similar to the plastic film bag
identified in § 173.197(e)(1) used to transport solid regulated medical waste. You ask
whether the non-bulk inner packaging (sharps container) may be a plastic film bag
provided it is puncture-resistant, and—when exceeding 20 gallons—capable of passing
the performance test in Part 178, Subpart M at the Packing Group II performance level.
A1. Paragraph (e)(1) of § 173.197 specifies the requirements for the inner packaging for solid
regulated medical waste transported in a Large Packaging. Sharps are objects that can
pierce certain types of packaging, therefore, the inner packaging for sharps transported in
a Large Packaging must conform to § 173.197(e)(3). Each puncture-resistant, non-bulk
inner packaging (sharps container) used to transport sharps in a Large Packaging must be
securely closed to prevent leaks or punctures in conformance with instructions provided
by the packaging manufacturer and each sharps container exceeding 76 L (20 gallons) in
volume must be capable of passing the performance tests in part 178, subpart M at the
Packing Group II performance level. A sharps container intended for reuse in a Large
Packaging must be approved and certified as a medical device for reuse by the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) and meet additional requirements under § 173.197(e)(3).
Please note, a sharps container may be subject to other requirements, such as The
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Bloodborne Pathogens standard
(see 29 CFR § 1910.1030) and FDA and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
requirements.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Q2. You ask what specific performance test may be required under Part 178, Subpart M for
the plastic film bag used as the inner packaging of a Large Packaging when transporting
sharps.
A2. PHMSA has not identified a testing procedure to determine whether a poly bag can resist
punctures from hypodermic needles and other sharp objects generated in the medical
industry. If you can identify a test standard that demonstrates puncture resistance of a
poly bag to objects— such as used hypodermic needles— and provides for an appropriate
level of safety for the transportation of hazardous materials, you may ask PHMSA to
incorporate by reference a new standard by filing a petition for rulemaking in accordance
with rulemaking procedures in §§ 106.95-106.105.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
T. Glenn Foster
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Pollack
22-0070
From: Foster, Glenn (PHMSA)
To: Date: Attachments: Dodd, Alice (PHMSA); Hillman, Kenetha CTR (PHMSA)
Subject: FW: Request for Guidance
Thursday, July 14, 2022 6:17:16 AM
Foster - Request Interpretation 7-13-22.docx
Good morning, Alice and Kenetha.
Please have the attached checked in and assigned as a request for a letter of interpretation.
Thanks,
Glenn
From: Wiseman, Tim <twiseman@scopelitis.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 5:46 AM
To: PHMSA_Guidance <PHMSA_Guidance@dot.gov>
Cc: Foster, Glenn (PHMSA) <Glenn.Foster@dot.gov>
Subject: Request for Guidance
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do
not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Please find the attached Request for Guidance, and let me know if you have any
questions. Thanks! -Tim
Timothy W. Wiseman, Partner
Scopelitis, Garvin, Light, Hanson & Feary, P.C.
10 West Market Street, Suite 1400, Indianapolis, IN 46204
twiseman@scopelitis.com | T: 317.637.1777 | D: 317.492.9221
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is privileged and confidential for the addressee(s) named above. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are prohibited from disseminating, using, or copying the contents and should notify the sender immediately that you
received this message in error. The signature(s) within this email does not constitute any binding agreement.

<<<PAGE 4>>>

10 West Market Street
Suite 1400
Indianapolis, IN 46204 TIMOTHY W. WISEMAN
twiseman@scopelitis.com
The full service transportation law firm
www.scopelitis.com
Main (317) 637-1777
Fax (317) 687-2414
August 23, 2023
Mr. T. Glenn Foster, Chief
Regulatory Review & Reinvention Branch
Standards & Rulemaking Division
U.S. Department of Transportation
Pipeline & Hazardous Material Safety Adm.
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
Re: 49 C.F.R. § 173.197(e)(3)
Request for Interpretation
Dear Mr. Foster:
Pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 105.20, I write to request guidance with respect to the
requirements for the transportation of sharps in a large packaging under 49 C.F.R. §
173.197(e)(3), which provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
Sharps transported in a Large Packaging, Cart, or BOP must be
packaged in a puncture-resistant inner packaging (sharps container).
Each sharps container must be securely closed to prevent leaks or
punctures in conformance with instructions provided by the packing
manufacturer. Each sharps container exceeding 76 L (20 gallons) in
volume must be capable of passing the performance test in Part 178,
Subpart M, of this Subchapter at the Packing Group II performance level.
Indianapolis ■ Chicago ■ Washington, D.C. ■ Los Angeles ■ Chattanooga
Detroit ■ Dallas/Fort Worth ■ Milwaukee ■ Seattle ■ St. Louis ■ Cincinnati
SERVICES OUTSIDE CALIFORNIA AND MICHIGAN PROVIDED BY SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
SERVICES IN MICHIGAN PROVIDED BY SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
SERVICES IN CALIFORNIA PROVIDED BY SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP

<<<PAGE 5>>>

Mr. T. Glenn Foster, Chief
August 23, 2023
Page 2
My questions pertaining to the particular regulation are as follows:
1. Can the inner packaging referenced in § 173.197(e)(3) be a plastic film
bag (similar to the film bag identified in § 173.197(e)(1)) as long as it is
puncture-resistant, and, when exceeding 20 gallons, capable of passing
the performance test in Part 178, Subpart M at the Packing Group II
performance level?
2. If the response to Question #1 is yes, what specific performance test
would be required under Part 178, Subpart M, for the plastic film bag
used as the inner packaging with a large packing for the transportation
of sharps?
If any additional information is needed to consider this request, please do not hesitate
to contact me.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Timothy W. Wiseman
Timothy W. Wiseman
TWW/kkc

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77861/220070.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `8d428379d1f198d3c0677adafff20de30d4f3e4cbbd4185a2cdd026f83d35532`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T22:27:47.305Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-22-0070`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Scopelitis, Gavin, Light, Hanson & Feary, P.C."
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Timothy W. Wiseman"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "22-0070"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2023-08-22"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    173,
    178
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 2,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/73816"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "173.197",
    "173.197(e)(3)"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/part/178",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/173197"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77861/220070.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77861/220070.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77861/220070.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/22-0070-e6e1ee1bbe.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "ee6d4fdb223d855b1623041fcf6086c538c7061afc6b93f49e572a3f3bae1114",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/22-0070-e6e1ee1bbe.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "d10dac067d26a00aa9d651c2ff5927a6ac05c034ea185ff58e2e8b0f993f53c0",
      "pageCount": 5,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
