# Mr. Nick Wright — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 22-0117  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2023-07-24

22-0117 concerning 172.202.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
July 24, 2023
Mr. Nick Wright
1220 S. Enterprise
Olathe, KS 66061
Reference No. 22-0117
Dear Mr. Wright:
This letter is in response to your October 27, 2022, email requesting clarification of the
Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to the description of
hazardous materials on shipping papers. In your email, you referenced a previous Letter of
Interpretation (LOI) Ref. No. 15-0229R1 and note that it may relate to your specific question.
In LOI Ref. No. 15-0229R, we stated that “…PHMSA maintains that the term ‘cargo tank’ most
appropriately describes the type of package; however, the term ‘cargo tank motor vehicle’ or
‘CTMV’ is acceptable…” and therefore the term “ CTMV”—representing “one cargo tank motor
vehicle”
—is an acceptable description of total quantity, unit of measure, number, and type of
package on a shipping paper as specified in § 172.202(a)(5) and (a)(7). As such, you ask
whether the term “1 TRUCK LOAD” meets the requirements pertaining to a description of a
hazardous material on a shipping paper as specified in § 172.202(a)(5)(iii)(A) and (a)(7)
pertaining to the total quantity, unit of measure, number, and type of package.
Section 172.202(a)(5)(iii)(A) of the HMR provides that bulk packagings are excepted from the
requirements specified in § 172.202(a)(5), provided some indication of the total quantity is
shown on a shipping paper. Although “1 TRUCK LOAD” indicates a general description of the
total quantity of the shipment, it is the opinion of this Office that it does not adequately describe
the type of package containing the hazardous materials being transported and could result in the
frustration of the shipment.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
T. Glenn Foster
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division
1 See 15-0229R (Nov. 3, 2016) at: https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/interp/15-0229R

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Jacobson
From: INFOCNTR (PHMSA)
To: Subject: Date: Dodd, Alice (PHMSA); Hazmat Interps
FW: Request for official PHMSA interpretation
Monday, October 31, 2022 4:33:34 PM
22-0117
Hi Alice and team,
Please see the LOI request below. Thank you.
-Rachel (HMIC)
From: Nicholas Wright [KHP] <Nicholas.Wright@KS.GOV>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2022 5:17 PM
To: INFOCNTR (PHMSA) <INFOCNTR.INFOCNTR@dot.gov>
Subject: Request for official PHMSA interpretation
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do
not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Greetings,
I am seeking an official PHMSA interpretation on the following question:
Does the verbiage “1 TRUCK LOAD” satisfy the shipping paper requirement (49 CFR
172.202(a)(5)(iii)(A) and 172.202(a)(7)) for a total quantity, unit of measure, number, and type of
package?
I am familiar with PHMSA interpretation #15-0229R, regarding the use of “1 CTMV” to represent “1
cargo tank,” but I would like official clarification as to whether “TRUCK LOAD” is acceptable.
Technical Trooper Nick Wright, K-100
Kansas Highway Patrol
MCSAP Training / Public Information
Troop I, Commercial Vehicle Enforcement
1220 S. Enterprise
Olathe, KS 66061
Office: (913) 782-8100
Nicholas.Wright@ks.gov

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77731/220117.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `e8327ec32c7d85b52716633f90225e1570b67595bf4ad5aa94c78826b6716839`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T11:13:56.684Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-22-0117`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Nick Wright"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "22-0117"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2023-07-24"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    172
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/73761"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "172.202",
    "172.202(a)(5)"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/172202"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77731/220117.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77731/220117.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/docs/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/77731/220117.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/22-0117-f10ce1ed95.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "83dda0c3ef95740ebe63d852faffaf25693de3670c6e28f775bc99707db0cedf",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/22-0117-f10ce1ed95.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "29edd99a1560e0e61e0f972f068601c1686ebc07876170cb8ace143be62948ed",
      "pageCount": 2,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
