# National Cargo Bureau — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 24-0097  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2024-12-30

24-0097 response to National Cargo Bureau concerning 171.23, 172.313.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
December 30, 2024
Graeme McPhee
Director of Hazardous Materials
National Cargo Bureau
180 Maiden Lane
Suite 903
New York, NY 10038
Reference No. 24-0097
Dear Mr. McPhee:
This letter is in response to your October 2, 2024, email requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to marking cargo transport units
(CTUs) with the appropriate United Nations (UN) identification number for poison inhalation
hazard (PIH) materials. Specifically, you ask a series of questions regarding the requirement for
PIH materials found in § 171.23(b) as it relates to the § 172.313(c) marking requirements for PIH
materials when loaded on a CTU and provide us your understanding. Note that it is our
understanding that the questions relate to loading of non-bulk packages at one facility. Further,
you seek clarification regarding the marking of CTUs with the appropriate identification number
for PIH materials.
We have paraphrased and answered your questions as follows:
Q1. You ask which identification number should be displayed for one shipment containing
800 kg of a PIH material in Hazard Zone A when combined with 1,200 kg of a PIH
material in Hazard Zone B.
A1. In accordance with § 172.313(c), a CTU containing a PIH material in non-bulk packages
shall be marked on each side and each end if it meets conditions in § 172.313(c)(1) and
(c)(2). Although the CTU contains materials in different hazard zones, only the Hazard
Zone B material is present in 1,000 kg or more; therefore, the identification number for
the material in Hazard Zone B shall be marked when loaded at one facility in non-bulk
packages.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Q2. You ask which identification number should be displayed for one shipment containing
1,100 kg of a PIH material in Hazard Zone A when combined with 1,200 kg of a PIH
material in Hazard Zone B.
A2. In accordance with § 172.313(c)(3)(ii), if the CTU contains more than one material
meeting the conditions of § 172.313(c)(3) and the materials are in both Hazard Zone A
and B, the CTU shall be marked with the identification number for the Hazard Zone A
material.
Q3. You ask whether a CTU that contains a PIH material in Hazard Zone A or Hazard Zone
B with less than 1,000 kg would be a violation of the transport marking requirements if
the identification number is displayed on all four sides of the CTU.
A3. For purposes of the HMR, the answer is no. There is no prohibition when displaying the
identification number as a person is allowed to permissively mark a container provided
the marking represents the hazard present in the CTU. For purposes of the International
Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code, Section 5.3.2.1—Display of UN Markings—
specifies the conditions when to properly mark a CTU, yet it also does not prohibit
permissive marking of a CTU.
Q4. You ask whether a CTU that contains only a PIH material in Hazard Zone C or Hazard
Zone D with less than 4,000 kg would be a violation of the transport marking
requirements if the identification number is displayed on all four sides of the CTU.
A4. The answer is no, see answer A3.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Dirk Der Kinderen
Chief, Standards Development Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Baker
24-0097
From: Webb, Steven (PHMSA)
To: Dodd, Alice (PHMSA)
Subject: FW: PIH - Display of UN Numbers
Date: Friday, October 18, 2024 12:01:42 PM
Attachments: Outlook-cwzzzumb.png
image002.png
Alice,
Per conversation with the stakeholder please process the below questions as a request for
interpretation. The requestors mailing address info is:
Graeme McPhee
Director, Hazardous Materials
National Cargo Bureau
180 Maiden Lane Suite 903
New York
NY 10038
Please let me know if you need additional info from me or the requestor.
V/R
Steve
Steve Webb
Assistant Coordinator International Program
Office of Hazardous Material Safety
US Department of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E., E24-422, Washington D.C. 20590
E24-422
Office: 202.366.4579
PHMSA Home | LinkedIn | Twitter | HAZMAT | OPS
From: Graeme McPhee <mcphee@natcargo.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2024 9:01 AM
To: Webb, Steven (PHMSA) <steven.webb@dot.gov>
Cc: Eric Rounds <rounds@natcargo.org>

<<<PAGE 4>>>

Subject: PIH - Display of UN Numbers
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the Department of Transportation (DOT). Do
not click on links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Good morning Steve,
Sorry to bother you, but I'm hoping you can offer some assistance here.
The issue is regarding 171.23(b)(10) and subsequently 172.313( c ) and the marking of CTU's with
the appropriate UN numbers for PIH's.
We need to provide proper instruction to our surveyors, but we are having some differences of
opinion internally.
Could I please ask you to review the 4 questions below and comment if the answers are incorrect? If
we have these answers, it will help us understand 172.313( c ) better.
Q1. Which UN number should be displayed for one shipment containing 800 Kg of Zone "A"
combined with 1200Kg of Zone "B"?
A1. The shipment first has to meet with (1) and (2).... so, in this scenario only the 1200kg of Zone "B"
meets both (1) and (2). Therefore, it is the UN# for that Zone "B" commodity that would be displayed
on both sides, and both ends of the container.
Q2. Which UN number should be displayed for one shipment containing 1100 Kg of Zone
"A" combined with 1200Kg of Zone "B"?
A2. Zone “A” UN number to be displayed, due to both commodities meeting (1) and (2) and then we
apply - (ii) For different materials in both Hazard Zones A and B, with the identification number for
the Hazard Zone A material."
Q3. If the container has Zone A or Zone B commodities with less that 1,000kg, and the UN number is
displayed on all 4 sides of the CTU, is this a deficiency?
A3. Yes, UN not required under 49CFR and under IMDG Code. IMDG Code is not permissive, so, yes
this is a deficiency.
Q4. If the container has only Zone C (or Zone D) commodity with less than 4,000ks, and the UN
number is displayed on all 4 sides of the CTU, is this a deficiency?
A4. Yes, UN not required under 49CFR and under IMDG Code, IMDG Code is not permissive, so, yes
this is a deficiency.
Regards

<<<PAGE 5>>>

Graeme
Graeme McPhee
Director Hazardous Materials
Office Main: 212-785-8300
Direct Line: 212-785-3034
Cell: 917-769-6693

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2025-01/240097.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `e1c1be2e0a3f3e888f40a3ed526ec25fc2e1845253e8f82050c76e997749e3b6`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-25T14:26:20.290Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-24-0097`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "National Cargo Bureau"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Graeme McPhee"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "24-0097"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2024-12-30"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    171,
    172
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 2,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/76271"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "171.23",
    "171.23(b)",
    "172.313",
    "172.313(c)"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/17123",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/172313"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2025-01/240097.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2025-01/240097.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2025-01/240097.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/24-0097-b1e01ed000.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "b8ce0b2c7bca9d76f01210c8c233f2154233db0d0a4f2275c6629bb2d7dc99f6",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/24-0097-b1e01ed000.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "e9cc0be4a0b6d04592911375a3b5a04823e4bb31daafcc262749bfb330f7d301",
      "pageCount": 5,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
