# NeoWave S.A.S. de C.V. — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 25-0115  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2026-03-19

25-0115 response to NeoWave S.A.S. de C.V. concerning 173.33, 178.345, 180.405, 180.413.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
Washington, DC 20590
U.S. Department
of Transportation
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety
Administration
March 19, 2026
Francisco Davila
Registered Inspector
NeoWave S.A.S. de C.V.
Hacienda Monte Real 107
Hacienda El Campanario
Apodaca, Nuevo Leon, Mexico 66643
Reference No. 25-0115
Dear Mr. Davila:
This letter is in response to your August 7, 2025 letter requesting clarification of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) applicable to cargo tank modifications.
Specifically, you state that you are inquiring about modifying a cargo tank to a different
specification than that which it was originally built. You state that some manufacturers, repair
facilities, and registered inspectors are under the assumption that a Motor Carrier (MC) 300-
series cargo tank can have its name plate modified to reflect a current Department of
Transportation (DOT) 400-series specification if that cargo tank meets the requirements outlined
in §§ 178.345 through 178.348. You ask a series of questions regarding the modification of MC
300-series cargo tanks.
We have paraphrased and answered your questions as follows:
Q1. You ask whether § 180.405(b)(2) allows for the recertification of MC 306, MC 307, and
MC 312 cargo tanks to their original specification.
A1. Yes, § 180.405(b)(2) allows cargo tanks originally manufactured as MC 306, MC 307,
and MC 312 cargo tanks to be recertified to their original specification. This serves as an
exception to paragraph (b)(1) of that section which states that no cargo tank may be
marked or certified after August 31, 1995, to the applicable MC 306, MC 307, MC 312,
MC 331, or MC 338 standard for that specification in effect on December 30, 1990. This
allows a registered inspector to recertify an MC 306, MC 307, or MC 312 cargo tank
after it has been modified.
Q2. You ask whether § 180.405(c)(2) allows MC 300-series cargo tanks to have their pressure
relief devices (PRDs) and outlets modified to conform to DOT 400-series cargo tank
specifications.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

A2. Yes, MC 300-series cargo tanks may have their PRDs and outlets modified to meet
certain DOT 400-series specifications as authorized by § 173.33(d)(3) and
§ 180.405(c)(2). PHMSA previously amended the HMR in a final rule, HM-183, to
discontinue the construction of MC 300-series cargo tanks and authorized the use of DOT
400-series PRDs on the remaining in-service MC 300-series cargo tanks.a
Q3. You ask whether it is permissible, if a cargo tank complies with the regulations
applicable to a DOT 400-series cargo tank, to change the specification on the nameplate
from showing MC 300-series to show DOT 400-series.
A3. Yes, the HMR allows for the modification, stretching, or rebarrelling of only those listed
MC 300-series cargo tanks to the corresponding DOT 400-series specifications specified
in § 180.413(d)(2)(i) through (iii). All the provisions in § 180.413(d)(1) through (d)(4)
must be met for modifications, including the installation of a supplemental specification
plate, nameplate, or both containing the information that reflects the cargo tank as
modified, stretched, or rebarrelled.
I hope this information is helpful. Please contact us if we can be of further assistance.
Sincerely,
Alexander Wolcott
Acting Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention Branch
Standards and Rulemaking Division
a 54 FR 24982 (Jun. 12, 1989)

<<<PAGE 3>>>

NeoWave S.A.S. de C.V.
R.F.C.: NEO230628AS6
Hacienda Monte Real 107, Hacienda El Campanario
Apodaca, Nuevo León, México, 66643
+52 (813) 593-0901 contacto@neowave.mx
August 7, 2025
Larson, R.
25-0115
Standards and Rulemaking Division
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Attn: PHH-10
U.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE East Building, 2nd Floor
Washington, DC 20590
phmsa.hm-infocenter@dot.gov
Request for Interpretation
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to inquire about the possibility of modifying a cargo tank to a different specification than the one it was
originally manufactured under.
Some manufacturers, repair facilities, and registered inspectors operate under the presumption that a cargo tank in
the MC 3XX series can have its name plate modified to reflect a current DOT 4XX series, since the cargo tank meets
the requirements outlined in §§178.345 through 178.348.
According to §180.405, which addresses the qualification of cargo tanks, paragraph (b) states that a cargo tank
originally manufactured to, and I quote, “the MC 306, MC 307, or MC 312 specification may be recertified to the original
specification provided” it meets the requirements further outlined in that paragraph.
Additionally, §180.405(c)(2) states that a cargo tank listed in paragraph (c)(1) of the same section may have its pressure
relief devices and outlets modified to conform to a newer specification.
So, the following questions arise:
1) If a cargo tank complies with all current regulations applicable to the DOT 4XX series, is it permissible to
change the specification on the name plate from an MC 3XX series to a DOT 4XX series?
2) If the answer to the previous question is no, how should the regulations be interpreted to support the
conclusion that the cargo tank cannot be reclassified from its original specification?
I truly appreciate your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Francisco Davila | Registered Inspector
Email: francisco.davila@neowave.mx
Mobile: +52 (818) 011-1643
Fax: +1 956 997 9231

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/25-0115>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `076a02cf566e6a80bce1e499dcb66870a7b0f2bd7aceeb21ef2db33ef7958a8e`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-21T23:37:37.253Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-25-0115`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "NeoWave S.A.S. de C.V."
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Francisco Davila"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "25-0115"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2026-03-19"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    173,
    178,
    180
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 4,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/82936"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "173.33",
    "173.33(d)(3)",
    "178.345",
    "180.405",
    "180.405(b)(2)",
    "180.413",
    "180.413(d)(2)(i)",
    "178.348"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/17333",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/178345",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/180405",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/180413"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2026-03/25-0115.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/25-0115",
      "detailUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/standards-rulemaking/hazmat/interpretations/25-0115",
      "detailHtmlPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/detail-pages/25-0115-f65eb759.html",
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/2026-03/25-0115.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/25-0115-5c5690763e.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "71d43bb0e3bbb12d5d16e93e7bffb51cf3ac91f84d76c415e32096c6206c0d58",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/25-0115-5c5690763e.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "275426e137ae869f0ebbda8bf27d62b17c61191eb8474e5305c5d12888d86740",
      "pageCount": 3,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
