# Musashino Chemical Laboratory, — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 98-0240  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 1998-10-23

98-0240 response to Musashino Chemical Laboratory, concerning 172.101.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Research and
Special Programs
OCT 23 1998
Administration
Mr. Yukawa Muneaki
Technical Department Manager
Ref. No.
98-0240
Musashino Chemical Laboratory, Itd.
Yaesu-Daibiru Bldg.
1-1, Kyobashi I-Chome, Chuo-Ku
Tokyo 104 Japan 0031
Deax Mr. Muneaki:
This is in response to your letter dated August 18, 1998,
regarding the applicability of the Hazardous Materials
Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) to lactic acid and its
derivatives.
material as defined in the HMR.
Specifically, you ask if lactic acid is a class 8
understanding that lactic acid is
You also state that it is your
dermal irritation/corrosion classification contained in the 1992
a class 8 material based on the
Guideline for Testing of Chemicals.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
Under § 173.136 of the HMR, class 8 materials are liquids or
solids that cause full and irreversible thickness destruction of
human skin at the site of contact within a specified period of
A liquid that has
a severe corrosion rate on steel or
aluminum based on the criteria in § 173.137 (c) (2) is also a
corrosive material.
after
A packing group is
evaluating data obtained from testing conducted in
assigned to the material
accordance with OECD Guidelines, and then determined from the
criteria specified in § 173.137.
If your material has been tested for skin corrosion using a
previously authorized test method
there is no need to retest it.
If you choose to have your
and found to be not corrosive,
material retested, however, and it meets, for example, class 8,
packing group Ill, a proper shipping name then must be selected
Irom the generic or n.o.s. descriptions corresponding to the
specific hazard class
and packing group for the material and it
applicable requirements.
must be offered for transportation in accordance with the
.-

<<<PAGE 2>>>

I hope this satisfies your inquixy. Also, I have enclosed some
•
informational material.
further assistance.
Please contact us if we can be of
Sincerely,
Hatte z. Mitchell
Hattie I. Mitchell, Chief
Regulatory Review and Reinvention
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 3>>>

0598-8-18:10:11 AM: 206 (#
;03 3275 2206
11 2DHM
98-0248
TELEX: 2222235 LACHEMS
TELEPHONE +03-3274-5501
Musashino
FAX: 03-3272-4366
Chemical Laboratory;Ltd.
1-1, KYOBASHI 1 CHOME, CHUO-KU
YAESU•DAIBIRU BLDG.
TOKYO 104 JAPAN
•.
-0031
Stevens
Date
: August
$172,101 (k)
To
18th, 1998
: US Department of Transportation
Lactic Acid
At t n.
: Mr. Edward
T. MAZZULLO
:
Director, Office of Hazardus Materials
Statement
'From
: YUKAWA Muneaki/
Manager of Teahnical Department
Re
: Lactic Acid
Dear Mr. Mazzullo, .
exporting laotic acid and its derivatives
worldwidely.
Recently we have had your opinion that lactic
as restad, is not
a corrosivo
material: based on the definition for "correstro
at 49 CFR 173.136, test
criteria to
determine the packing group of Class 8 material
However we understand ihat lactic acid is a
orrosive material based on the 1992 OECD Guide
for Testing of Chemicals Number 404 Acute
Dormal Irritation/Corrosion" which
is attached.
would like to take your comment whether
Lactic acid
is a
corrosive or not.
Please
inform us your opionion for lactic acid.
Best regards
TEMPE
ajutawam,

<<<PAGE 4>>>

198-8-18;10:11AM; #80 (#) #
:03 3275 2206
#
2/2
2404•
7217.07.92
Adopted
FOECD GUIDELINE FOR TESTING OF CHEMICALS
Dcp: Organization for Ecomonic Cooperation end deme lime;
Adopted by the Council on 17"' July 1992
•:
Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion
INTRODUCTION
progress. In the review, special attention is given to possible improvements in relation to animal
OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals are periodically reviewed in light of scientific
welfare. This updated version of the original guideline 404 (adopted in 1981) is the outcome of a
meeting of OECD experts held in Paris in May 1991.
; •
inclusion of data from in vitro tests in the information on which a decision not to proceed to an in vivo.
The main differences between this and the original version of the guideline are: a) the
allowing certain chemicals to be exempted from further testing.
test can be based; and b) the possibility to use one animal in a first step of the in vivo procedure
3.
Definitions used are set out in the Annex.
INITIAL CONSIERATIONS
4.
avoided, and that any testing which is likely to produce severe responses in animals is minimised.
In the interests of animal welfare, it is important that the winecessary use of animals is
Consequently, test materials meeting any of the following criteria should not be tested in animals for
dermal irritation/corrosion:
i)
materials that have predictable corrosive potential based on structure-activity
relationships and/or physicochemical properties such as strong acidity or alkalinity,
or acidic reserve (1) should also be taken into account);
e.g., when the material to be applied has a pit of 2 or less or 11.5 or greater (alkaline
ịi)
materials which have been shown to be highly toxic by the dermal route;
iii)
materials which, in an acute dermal toxicity test (2), have been shown not to produce
irritation of the skin at the limit test dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight.
predicted on the basis of results from in vitro tests (3).
In addition, it may not be necessary to test in vivo materials for which corrosive properties are
PRINCIPLE OF THE IN VIVO TEST •
5. * The substance to be tested is applied in a single dose to the skin of one or more experiatental
animals, untreated skin areas of the test animal (s) serving as control. The degree of irritation is read
1/6
...

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/1998/980240.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `47073b10ec6fbd574fe05e22f58037fe1cfd6c8b29bf6cca1d322d62c81af759`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-23T10:57:41.833Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-98-0240`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Musashino Chemical Laboratory,"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Yukawa Muneaki"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "98-0240"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "1998-10-23"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    172
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/50791"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "172.101",
    "173.136",
    "173.137"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/172101"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/1998/980240.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/1998/980240.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/1998/980240.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/98-0240-2338458175.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "3ae38599f248aceed88d7e8288009efa8ce8487441aed2294a440fdbff60be89",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/98-0240-2338458175.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "7ec6fe953f77cbea1bd6107b952ed9bb32dd19a9a5b8bbe01917b0f6e4dccbd8",
      "pageCount": 4,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
