# Commercial Vehicle Consultant — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** 99-0076  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 1999-12-22

99-0076 response to Commercial Vehicle Consultant concerning 172.401.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

U.S. Department
00 Seventh Street, S.M
of Transportation
Vashington, D.C. 2055
Research and
Administration
Special Programs
DEC 2 2 1999
Mr. Ralph B. Wood
Ref. No. 99-0076
Commercial Vehicle Consultant
23076 Dune Mear Road
Lake Forest, CA 92630-3933
Dear Mr. Wood:
This is in response to your inquiry concerning whether the use of
permissible under the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49
two different primary hazard labels for the same hazard class is
GAS or TOXIC GAS label and the new poison inhalation hazard (PIH)
CER Parts 171-180).
Specifically, you inquire whether
label may be displayed on
a cylinder containing Sulfuryl
fluoride, 2.3, UN2191. The International Maritime Dangerous Goods
Code does not provide for the display of the PIH label as
required by the HMR effective
October 1, 1999.
The answer
to your question is yes, the dual display of the old
POISON GAS
or TOXIC GAS label and the new PIH label is
acceptable.
The old label represents the hazard of material in
the package and is required under the International Maritime
Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code.
Its continued use under the HMR is
acceptable as specified in $ 172.401 (a) (2) and (c)
respectively.
In
a recent
interim final rule (September 16, 1999; HM-206D; 64
FR 50260), we provided a
transition period until October 1, 2001,
the old POISON GAS or TOXIC GAS label in accordance with the IMDG
to allow
a package containing a PIH material to be labeled with
Code, subject to the following conditions and limitations:
(1)
The material must be packaged in accordance with the
HMR;
(2)
The package must be marked "inhalation hazard" in
accordance with § 172.313 (a);
(3)
The package must be transported in a closed transport
vehicle or freight container that is marked with the
identification number for any quantity of PIH materials
as prescribed in § 172.313 (c);
172.401
990076

<<<PAGE 2>>>

:
(4)
If a closed transport vehicle or freight container
with the identification number determined according to
contains more than one PIH material, it must be marked
$ 172.313 (C) (3); and
(5) A closed transport vehicle or freight container must be
placarded as required by subpart F of part 172 of the
HMR.
I trust this satisfies your inquiry. Please contact us if we can
be of further
assistance.
Sincerely,
Hotte 2. Mithell
Hattie I. Mitchell
Chief, Regulatory Review and Reinvention
Office of Hazardous Materials Standards

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Stevens
8172.401
99-0076
RALPH B. WOOD
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE CONSULIANT
Edward I. Mazzullo
Materials Standards
Director, Office of Hazardous
Dear Sir
I would like to have an official interpretation on the
cylinder two primary labels for the same hazard class. DOW
following subject. Is it permissible to display on a gas
AGRO is currently displaying the new poison inhalation
hazard label and the old poison gas label on the same
cylinder, next to each other. Both labels display the class
number at the bottom of the label. The reasoning that was
DOT poison inhalation hazard label, and that they ship some
given for doing this is, that IMO does not recognize the Us
cylinders overseas. The product in the cylinders is Sulfuryl
Fluoride 2,3 UN2191 . There is no subsidiary hazard
indicated. Thank you for your reply in advance
SiACarely
Wood
23076 Dune Mear Road, Lake Forest, CA 92630-3933
(949) 830-4328 Fax (949) 830-4884
E-Mail: RWood5991@aol.com
1

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/1999/990076.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `9c7f0d20b658a0bc2bb9731dbae6c9178fb63bbc19947629de1d7eb5754d0230`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T04:01:46.972Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-99-0076`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "Commercial Vehicle Consultant"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "Mr. Ralph B. Wood"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "99-0076"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "1999-12-22"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    172
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/64721"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "172.401",
    "172.313"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/172401"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/1999/990076.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/1999/990076.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/1999/990076.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/99-0076-97c8aa1e4d.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "4c9175ae4921128bfd20141ebde28efaa5667e9b82d345cc85b434f01a9a7f4e",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/99-0076-97c8aa1e4d.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "6ed51b900951d211bbdb1f207144564c26fc8a6b56faee6ade4bb5ad302d67e1",
      "pageCount": 3,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
