# Dr. Burton Z. Davidson — Hazardous Materials Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** CHI-95-002  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 1995-08-28

CHI-95-002 concerning 171.15, 171.16.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

US Department
of Transportation
Research and
Special Programs
Administration
8ff:c c c! the
Ch1ei Cou11 se1
~-
•
. ..--::> .:i::;o Sevemh SI S W
\IV ;i sn1'ngton . D (., 2U'.J9(1
AUG 2 8 1995
Dr. Burton Z. Davidson, Ph.D., P.E.
5 Hamlet Court
Somerset, NJ 08873
Dear Dr. Davidson:
This responds to your August 21, 1995 letter concerning the
regulations applicable to the transportation of concentrated
nitric acid (98% by weight) in non-bulk packagings during the
1985-86 period.
In 1985-86, the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) consisted
of 49 C.F.R. Parts 171-179 and applied to the transportation of:
1. all hazardous materials by all air, rail, and water
carriers;
2. all hazardous materials by interstate and foreign
highway motor carriers; and
3. hazardous wastes, hazardous substances, and flammable
cryogenic liquids in cargo tanks and portable tanks by
intrastate highway ·motor carriers.
This means that the HMR did not (and they presently do not)
apply to non-bulk shipments of nitric acid (if not a hazardous
waste) by an intra- state motor carrier by highway. It is the
status of the carrier, not the individual shipment, that ·
determines the applicability of the HMR. (For example, a local
shipment of hazardous materials by United Parcel Service (UPS) ,
within one city, is always subject to the HMR, because UPS is
an interstate carrier.) Please note that RSPA has proposed to
extend the coverage of the HMR to all intrastate carriers in
rulemaking docket No. HM-200. 58 Fed. Reg. 36920 (July 9,
1993) , correction 58 Fed. Reg. 38111 (July 15, 1993). Also,
State requirements equivalent to the HMR may have applied to
a 1985-86 shipment by an intrastate highway motor carrier.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

2
Both§§ 173.268(c) (1) and 173.268(d) (1) of the HMR (1985 ed.),
among other requirements, applied to shipments of nitric acid
with a concentration of 90% or more. By its terms, § 173.268(c)
applied to nitric acid with any concentration of 80% of more;
it was not limited to nitric acid between 80% and 90%.
During 1985-86, a knowing violation of the HMR was subject to a
civil penalty of not more than $10,000 per violation, per day.
A wilful violation was subject to criminal penalties. There is
no requirement that there be an "incident in transportation"
for the Department of Transportation (DOT) to propose or assess
civil penalties for violations of the HMR. Most civil penalties
are assessed in cases where there has not been an "incident" in
transportation.
I do not understand your analogy to exceeding the speed limit,
inasmuch as speeding tickets are routinely issued in instances
where there is no accident or other "incident." If the avail-
able facts establish a violation of the HMR, an enforcement
case may be brought, even if the shipment has reached its
destination and transportation has ended. A DOT investigator
need not actually observe the improper shipment while it is
in transportation.
The HMR apply to transportation that is "in commerce." RSPA
has uniformly interpreted this to mean that movements of
property, and their storage, solely within the confines of
private property, are not subject to the HMR. At the same
time, loading, unloading, and storage "incidental to"
transportation are covered by the HMR.
Your example of company B receiving a container of nitric
acid, storing it, then emptying it, and finally reloading it
is unclear. If that container is being reloaded by company B,
for transportation fo- a location away from company B's premises,
then the loading process is subject to the HMR, and RSPA must
be advised of any reportable incident during loading. See
§§ 171.15 and 171.16. At the time hazardous materials are
offered for transportation, they must be packaged, marked,
labeled, and accompanied by a shipping paper as required in
the HMR. On the other hand, if no transportation off company
B's premises is involved, the HMR do not apply.

<<<PAGE 3>>>

3
I hope this information is helpful. If you have further
questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or Frazer
Hilder of my staff, at the above address or by telephone at
202-366-4400.
Sincerely,
~aL/
Edward H. Bonz;:;, III
Assistant Chief Counsel for
Hazardous Material Safety and
Research and Technology Law

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Hazmat/ChiefCounsel/CHI-95-002.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `505d2a13c1c142081e8aee3ddbbece9ce9d5ef473718b6a1a3c26c84a4eb35d1`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T14:15:37.825Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-chi-95-002`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "hazardous_materials",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [],
  "individuals": [
    "Dr. Burton Z. Davidson"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "CHI-95-002"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "1995-08-28"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    171
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 2,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/67826"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "171.15",
    "171.16",
    "173.268(c)"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/17115",
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/17116"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Hazmat/ChiefCounsel/CHI-95-002.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Hazmat/ChiefCounsel/CHI-95-002.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Hazmat/ChiefCounsel/CHI-95-002.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/chi-95-002-4918b51484.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "6e47224f4a6612bf2f9c596d3ff2f09fc97d74fb3cb3142afeffd0e5146ea96f",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/chi-95-002-4918b51484.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "73bcc1638ff238282c6550c24d0b69c86503a85ddabb26099ba8e102a6249ce7",
      "pageCount": 3,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
