# EFI Corporation — Pipeline Safety Interpretation

**Citation:** PI-01-0116  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 2001-09-15

PI-01-0116 response to EFI Corporation concerning 192.625.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

PI-01-0116
U.S. Department of Transportation
Research and Special Programs Administration
400 Seventh Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20590
September 15, 2001
Mr. John Jacobus
EFI Corporation
2218 Northpark Drive
Kingwood, TX 77339
Dear Mr. Jacobus:
Subsequent to our conversation on September 10, 2001, you forwarded an e-mail asking for an
interpretation of the exception to the gas transmission line odorization requirements found in the pipeline
safety regulations at 49 CFR §192.625(b)(1). This regulation states that a gas transmission line in a Class 3 or
Class 4 location must be odorized unless "[a]t least 50 percent of the length of the line downstream from that
location is in a Class 1 or Class 2 location." In your example, you note that ten miles of Class 3 or Class 4
transmission line would not have to be odorized if it terminated with as little as one mile of transmission line in a
Class 1 or Class 2 location.
Your interpretation is correct. If 50 percent of more of the transmission line mileage downstream from a
Class 3 or Class 4 location is in a Class I or Class 2 location, the gas need not be odorized. This exception to the
odorization requirements was included to address long distance pipelines that pass through some Class 3 or
Class 4 locations, but are predominately Class 1 or Class 2 downstream from that location.
Although your example is possible, it should be very rare. There are several reasons for this exception.
One is that odorization of gas complicates its use as an industrial feed stock. Another is that odorization of
transmission lines is of questionable value compared to odorization of distribution pipelines, which operate at a
much lower pressure and are more likely to experience slow leaks that could only be detected by odor.
If we can be of further assistance in this matter, please contact me at (202) 366-4565.
Sincerely yours,
Richard D. Huriaux, P.E.
Manager, Regulations
Office of Pipeline Safety

<<<PAGE 2>>>

Huriaus, Richard
From: John Jacobus [jjacobus@mindspring.com]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 11:59 AM
To: richard.huriaux@rspa.dot.gov
Subject: 196.625 interpretation
Thank you for taking the time to talk to me earlier today. My question specifically deals with 49CFR
192.625(b) and sequel. Specifically, (b) states that,
“(b) . . .a combustible gas in a transmission line in a class 3 or 4 location must comply with the requirements
of paragraph (a) of the section [i.e., must be odorized] unless:
(1) At least 50 percent of the length of the line downstream from that location is in a class 1 or 2
location. . .
Am I correct in interpreting this section to mean that there is no requirement for odorization of natural gas if a
transmission line passes through, for example, 10 miles of class 3 and/or 4 locations and terminates with one
mile (or even less) of transmission line passing numerous class 3 and /or 4 locations where long intervening
distances are class 1 or 2, but the mere fact that a transmission line terminates in a class 1 or 2 area should
not preclude odorization.
I would value your comments.
Thank you,
John jacobus
EFI Corporation
2218 Northpark Drive
Kingwood, TX 77339

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/2001/g01-09-15_Jacobus_192.625-msfx.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `f112047d8628a0bbabd14401d2d9f68e09780e7bc3cab0ffb05edd14450c551a`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T04:07:26.100Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-pi-01-0116`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "pipeline_safety",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [
    "EFI Corporation"
  ],
  "individuals": [
    "John Jacobus"
  ],
  "refIds": [
    "PI-01-0116"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "2001-09-15"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    192
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/60861"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "192.625",
    "192.625(b)(1)",
    "196.625"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/192625"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/2001/g01-09-15_Jacobus_192.625-msfx.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/2001/g01-09-15_Jacobus_192.625-msfx.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/2001/g01-09-15_Jacobus_192.625-msfx.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/pi-01-0116.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "4af4a860e3c41ac20f5be677ec4f7885da2259774a2b089fb04cd84b896acd46",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/pi-01-0116.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "e46420a47cadc1aa11607ede9beeb19bca419ae2a22497ee3cf565461f3b3510",
      "pageCount": 2,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
