# Pipeline Safety Interpretation PI-77-0105

**Citation:** PI-77-0105  
**Type / status:** guidance / guidance  
**Agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration  
**Effective:** Not stated  
**Published:** 1977-04-14

PI-77-0105 concerning 192.375.

## Document text

<<<PAGE 1>>>

PI-77-0105
April 14, 1977
Mr. W.L. Walls
Gas Field Service
National Fire Protection Association
470 Atlantic Avenue
Boston, MA 02210
Dear Mr. Walls:
This responds to your letter of February 22, 1977, regarding your comments that fire exposure of aboveground plastic
pipe should be covered in 49 CFR 192.375.
The requirement that the aboveground portion of a plastic service line be protected against “deterioration and external
damage” includes protection from fire exposure. Fire is a form of external damage and, therefore, it is not necessary
that it be specifically mentioned.
I look forward to seeing you at the next TPSSC meeting on May 10, 1977.
Sincerely,
SIGNED
Cesar DeLeon
Acting Director
Office of Pipeline
Safety Operations

<<<PAGE 2>>>

National Fire Protection Association
470 Atlantic Avenue
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
February 22, 1977
Mr. Cesar DeLeon, Acting Director
Office of Pipeline Safety Operations
Department of Transportation
2100 Second Street, SW
Washington, DC 20590
Ref.: Plastic Pipelines
Dear Cesar,
Notice 77-1, Docket No. OPSO-42 reminded me of a concern of mine. As it does not relate directly to this Notice, it
obviously cannot be considered a response thereto. I really don't know what use can be made of my concern but, as
least, my conscience will be soothed.
When plastic pipe was first proposed (perhaps about 10 years ago) there was pretty universal agreement that it should
not be permitted aboveground. There were a number of reasons for this, including its lack of resistance to heat from
fire.
The National Fuel Gas Code, ANSI Z223.1 - NFPA 54, has maintained its prohibition of aboveground plastic piping since
the matter was initially covered in the 1969 edition, While currently undergoing extensive revision, I am unaware of any
requests to modify the Code in this respect,
In contrast, however, 49CFR 192 has permitted plastic pipe aboveground for some time. 49CFR 192,375 does require
that the aboveground portion of a plastic service line be protected against "deterioration and external damage", The
nature of the deteriorating or damaging influences is not addressed,
It would seem to me that fire exposure should be one of these influences. Fires in grass, weeds, leaves, etc. are not
uncommon in the vicinity of those risers. I would not be unduly concerned if failure from fire exposure resulted only in
leakage aboveground. We should consider also that regulators and meters in the same fire area are also often of limited
fire resistance. However, if the design of the casing would permit underground leakage, then I would be concerned
substantially.
Has this aspect been considered?
Sincerely,
W.L. Walls
Gases Field Service

## Provenance

- Official: Yes
- Source: <https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1977/g77-04-14_Walls_192.375-nlmx.pdf>
- Source ID: `phmsa`
- SHA-256: `ef382ab430a73e00997665c03894e975db6ef3fdc70b7035fe5a596226c24837`
- Retrieved: 2026-08-20T00:59:31.977Z
- Exported: 2026-08-22T10:54:17.500Z
- Document slug: `phmsa-interpretation-pi-77-0105`

### Source metadata

```json
{
  "materialSubtype": "interpretation",
  "interpretationArea": "pipeline_safety",
  "representation": "full_text_from_official_pdf",
  "companies": [],
  "individuals": [],
  "refIds": [
    "PI-77-0105"
  ],
  "catalogDates": [
    "1977-04-14"
  ],
  "catalogParts": [
    192
  ],
  "catalogRowCount": 1,
  "sourceRecordUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/node/66996"
  ],
  "linkedAttachmentUrls": [],
  "unavailableResponseUrls": [],
  "duplicateRepresentationUrls": [],
  "citedSections": [
    "192.375"
  ],
  "catalogPageUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/regulations/title49/section/192375"
  ],
  "pdfUrls": [
    "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1977/g77-04-14_Walls_192.375-nlmx.pdf"
  ],
  "representations": [
    {
      "viewUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1977/g77-04-14_Walls_192.375-nlmx.pdf",
      "detailUrl": null,
      "detailHtmlPath": null,
      "pdfUrl": "https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/sites/phmsa.dot.gov/files/legacy/interpretations/Interpretation%20Files/Pipeline/1977/g77-04-14_Walls_192.375-nlmx.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/pi-77-0105.pdf",
      "pdfArtifactSha256": "d2cf67789eb372c4836fcfdae68043cd8e204a4375e391c862f889f23376ef3f",
      "extractedTextPath": "data/sources/phmsa-interpretations/pi-77-0105.v2.txt",
      "extractedTextSha256": "d46e0bb24d769af588f2999742ac92279dae21f2f760520bea6fa1ebee8cb538",
      "pageCount": 2,
      "extractionVersion": 2
    }
  ],
  "caveat": "Interpretations apply regulations to the facts presented and do not create independently enforceable requirements.",
  "jurisdiction": "US"
}
```
