# Storage Tank Explosion and Fire

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** DCA03MP001
- **title:** Storage Tank Explosion and Fire
- **source type:** incident
- **agency:** National Transportation Safety Board
- **status:** current
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2026-01-30
- **effective on:** 2003-04-07
- **summary:** Accident. in Glenpool, OK, USA. on 2003-04-07. Other
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/ntsb-case-dca03mp001.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/ntsb-case-dca03mp001.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/ntsb-case-dca03mp001
- **source url:** https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/Pages/DCA03MP001.aspx
**body:**

NTSB investigation DCA03MP001.

Event Type: Accident

Event Date: 2003-04-07

Event City: Glenpool

Event State Or Region: OK

Event Country: USA

Accident Type: Other

Completion Status: Completed

Report Number: PAR-04-02

Probable cause: The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of the April 7, 2003, storage tank explosion and fire in Glenpool, Oklahoma, was ignition of a flammable fuel-air mixture within the tank by a static electricity discharge due to the improper manner in which ConocoPhillips Company conducted tank operations. Contributing to the extent of the property damage and the magnitude of the impact on the local community was the failure of American Electric Power employees to recognize the risk the tank fire posed to the nearby power lines and take effective emergency action.

Tier1Name: Post-release

Tier2Name: Fire

Tier1Name: Other

Tier2Name: Explosion

Finding Tier1Name: Organizational

Finding Tier2Name: Support/oversight/monitoring

Finding Tier3Name: Oversight

Finding Modifier Name: Federal agency

Finding Report Text: Organizational - Support/oversight/monitoring - Oversight - Federal agency

Finding Tier1Name: Organizational

Finding Tier2Name: Development

Finding Tier3Name: (general)

Finding Modifier Name: Other institution/organization

Finding Report Text: Organizational - Development - (general) - Other institution/organization

Finding Tier1Name: Personnel

Finding Tier2Name: Action/decision

Finding Tier3Name: Information processing/decision making

Finding Modifier Name: Other company personnel

Finding Report Text: Personnel - Action/decision - Information processing/decision making - Other company personnel

Finding Tier1Name: Pipeline

Finding Tier2Name: Miscellaneous equipment

Finding Tier3Name: Liquid/gas product

Finding Modifier Name: Incorrect use/operation

Finding Report Text: Pipeline - Miscellaneous equipment - Liquid/gas product - Incorrect use/operation

Finding Tier1Name: Environment/Infrastructure

Finding Tier2Name: Operating environment/control system

Finding Tier3Name: Product control system

Finding Modifier Name: Effect on equipment

Finding Report Text: Environment/Infrastructure - Operating environment/control system - Product control system - Effect on equipment

Official NTSB investigation data. NTSB findings determine probable cause and make safety recommendations; they do not adjudicate civil liability or regulatory violations.

What Happened
On April 7, 2003, at about 8:55 p.m., central daylight time, an 80,000-barrel storage tank at ConocoPhillips Company’s Glenpool South tank farm in Glenpool, Oklahoma, exploded and burned as it was being filled with diesel. The tank, designated tank 11, had previously contained gasoline, which had been removed from the tank earlier in the day. The tank contained between 7,397 and 7,600 barrels of diesel at the time of the explosion.

The resulting fire burned for about 21 hours and damaged two other storage tanks in the area. The cost of the accident, including emergency response, environmental remediation, evacuation, lost product, property damage, and claims, was $2,357,483. There were no injuries or fatalities. Nearby residents were evacuated, and schools were closed for 2 days.

What We Found
We determined that the probable cause of the April 7, 2003, storage tank explosion and fire in Glenpool, Oklahoma, was ignition of a flammable fuel-air mixture within the tank by a static electricity discharge due to the improper manner in which ConocoPhillips Company conducted tank operations.
Contributing to the extent of the property damage and the magnitude of the impact on the local community was the failure of American Electric Power employees to recognize the risk the tank fire posed to the nearby power lines and take effective emergency action.

The safety issues identified during the investigation of this accident are as follows:

Tank operations, including switch loading, at the ConocoPhillips tank farm.
The adequacy of emergency planning and emergency response by ConocoPhillips Company and American Electric Power.
The adequacy of Federal regulations and industry standards for emergency planning.

What We Recommended
As a result of this investigation, we made the following new safety recommendations.
To the Research and Special Programs Administration:

Revise the emergency response planning requirements in the pipeline safety regulations to include coordination with electric and other utilities that may need to respond to a pipeline emergency. (P-04-07)
Issue an advisory bulletin to liquid pipeline operators to validate the accuracy of their tank strapping tables. (P-04-08)

To ConocoPhillips Company:
Revise your storage tank operating procedures to include instructions for minimizing the possibility of creating a flammable atmosphere and the occurrence of a static discharge inside a tank after a floating roof has been either intentionally or unintentionally landed, especially for tanks where switch loading is likely to occur. (P-04-09)
Evaluate your storage tank operating procedures and make the revisions necessary to ensure that product flow rates in both the tank fill line and the discharge nozzles are restricted to provide a level of protection against excess static electricity that is at least commensurate with industry standards. (P-04-10)
Revise your emergency response plan for the Glenpool South tank farm area and similar locations where ConocoPhillips Company facilities are near electric utilities to include preplanning with nearby electric facilities. (P-04-11)

To American Electric Power: Revise your emergency response plan to include areas, such as the ConocoPhillips Company Glenpool South tank farm, where pipeline transportation facilities are near American Electric Power facilities, and include a requirement that the American Electric Power emergency responders communicate and coordinate with the on-scene agency in charge. (P-04-12)

To the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers:
Revise the National Electrical Safety Code to establish requirements for
operators to prepare and implement emergency response plans for electric
facilities where an emergency may affect pipeline facilities or that may be
affected by emergencies at pipeline facilities. (P-04-13)
To the American Society of Mechanical Engineers:
Revise the emergency response planning requirements in your gas and
hazardous liquid pipeline codes to include coordination with electric and
other utilities that may need to respond to a pipeline emergency. (P-04-14)

PAR-04-02
<<<PAGE 1>>>

Storage Tank Explosion and Fire in
Glenpool, Oklahoma
April 7, 2003
Pipeline Accident Report
NTSB/PAR-04/02
PB2004-916502
Notation 7666
National
Transportation
Safety Board
Washington, D.C.

<<<PAGE 2>>>

this page intentionally left blank

<<<PAGE 3>>>

Pipeline Accident Report
Storage Tank Explosion and Fire in
Glenpool, Oklahoma
April 7, 2003
NTSB/PAR-04/02
PB2004-916502 National Transportation Safety Board
Notation 7666 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W.
Adopted October 13, 2004 Washington, D.C. 20594

<<<PAGE 4>>>

National Transportation Safety Board. 2004. Storage Tank Explosion and Fire in Glenpool,
Oklahoma, April 7, 2003. Pipeline Accident Report NTSB/PAR-04/02. Washington, DC.
Abstract: About 8:55 p.m., central daylight time, on April 7, 2003, an 80,000-barrel storage tank at
ConocoPhillips Company’s Glenpool South tank farm in Glenpool, Oklahoma, exploded and burned as it
was being filled with diesel. Gasoline had been removed from the tank earlier in the day. The resulting fire
burned for about 21 hours and damaged two other storage tanks in the area. The cost of the accident was
$2,357,483. There were no injuries or fatalities. Nearby residents were evacuated, and schools were closed
for 2 days.
The safety issues identified in this accident are tank operations, including switch loading, at the
ConocoPhillips Company tank farm; the adequacy of emergency planning and emergency response by
ConocoPhillips and American Electric Power; and the adequacy of Federal regulations and industry
standards for emergency planning.
As a result of its investigation of this accident, the Safety Board makes safety recommendations to the
Research and Special Programs Administration, ConocoPhillips Company, American Electric Power, the
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
The National Transportation Safety Board is an independent Federal agency dedicated to promoting aviation, railroad, highway, marine,
pipeline, and hazardous materials safety. Established in 1967, the agency is mandated by Congress through the Independent Safety Board
Act of 1974 to investigate transportation accidents, determine the probable causes of the accidents, issue safety recommendations, study
transportation safety issues, and evaluate the safety effectiveness of government agencies involved in transportation. The Safety Board
makes public its actions and decisions through accident reports, safety studies, special investigation reports, safety recommendations, and
statistical reviews.
Recent publications are available in their entirety on the Web at <http://www.ntsb.gov>. Other information about available publications also
may be obtained from the Web site or by contacting:
National Transportation Safety Board
Public Inquiries Section, RE-51
490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20594
(800) 877-6799 or (202) 314-6551
Safety Board publications may be purchased, by individual copy or by subscription, from the National Technical Information Service. To
purchase this publication, order report number PB2004-916502 from:
National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, Virginia 22161
(800) 553-6847 or (703) 605-6000
The Independent Safety Board Act, as codified at 49 U.S.C. Section 1154(b), precludes the admission into evidence or use of Board reports
related to an incident or accident in a civil action for damages resulting from a matter mentioned in the report.

<<<PAGE 5>>>

iii Pipeline Accident Report
Contents
Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v
Factual Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Accident Synopsis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Accident Narrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Emergency Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Meteorological Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
ConocoPhillips Glenpool Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Tank 11 and Appurtenances . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Tank Farm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Control Centers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Explorer Glenpool Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
American Electric Power Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Postaccident Field Inspections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Tank 11 Wreckage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
ConocoPhillips Crude Oil Pipeline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
AEP Power Lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
ConocoPhillips Electrical Facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Tests and Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Safety Board Materials Laboratory Examination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Diesel Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Design Criteria for Tank Fill Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Switch Loading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Switch Loading and Tank 11 Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Safety Board Vapor Concentration Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
ConocoPhillips Crude Oil Pipeline Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Operating Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Explorer Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Industry Recommended Tank Filling Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
ConocoPhillips Tank Filling Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Postaccident Actions at ConocoPhillips Glenpool South Tank Farm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Federal Safety Regulations – Emergency Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Industry Emergency Response Plan Guidance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
ConocoPhillips Emergency Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Federal Safety Regulations – Ignition Protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
Tank Inspections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Office of Pipeline Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
ConocoPhillips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
National Electrical Safety Code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Exclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Static Electricity and Prevention of Accidental Ignition at Storage Tanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Static Charge Generation, Accumulation, and Dissipation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Floating Roof Position and Spark Gap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

<<<PAGE 6>>>

Contents iv Pipeline Accident Report
Accident Switch Loading and Flammable Vapors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Emergency Response . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
American Electric Power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
ConocoPhillips . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Emergency Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Federal Oversight of Pipeline Operators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Probable Cause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Appendix A: Investigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

<<<PAGE 7>>>

v Pipeline Accident Report
Executive Summary
On April 7, 2003, at about 8:55 p.m., central daylight time, an 80,000-barrel
storage tank at ConocoPhillips Company’s Glenpool South tank farm in Glenpool,
Oklahoma, exploded and burned as it was being filled with diesel. The tank, designated
tank 11, had previously contained gasoline, which had been removed from the tank earlier
in the day. The tank contained between 7,397 and 7,600 barrels of diesel at the time of the
explosion. The resulting fire burned for about 21 hours and damaged two other storage
tanks in the area. The cost of the accident, including emergency response, environmental
remediation, evacuation, lost product, property damage, and claims, was $2,357,483.
There were no injuries or fatalities. Nearby residents were evacuated, and schools were
closed for 2 days.
The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of
the April 7, 2003, storage tank explosion and fire in Glenpool, Oklahoma, was ignition of
a flammable fuel-air mixture within the tank by a static electricity discharge due to the
improper manner in which ConocoPhillips Company conducted tank operations.
Contributing to the extent of the property damage and the magnitude of the impact on the
local community was the failure of American Electric Power employees to recognize the
risk the tank fire posed to the nearby power lines and take effective emergency action.
The safety issues identified during the investigation of this accident are as follows:
• Tank operations, including switch loading, at the ConocoPhillips tank farm.
• The adequacy of emergency planning and emergency response by
ConocoPhillips Company and American Electric Power.
• The adequacy of Federal regulations and industry standards for emergency
planning.
As a result of its investigation of this accident, the National Transportation Safety
Board makes safety recommendations to the Research and Special Programs
Administration, ConocoPhillips Company, American Electric Power, the American
Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers.

<<<PAGE 8>>>

this page intentionally left blank

<<<PAGE 9>>>

1 Pipeline Accident Report
Factual Information
Accident Synopsis
On April 7, 2003, at about 8:55 p.m., central daylight time,1 an 80,000-barrel
storage tank at ConocoPhillips Company’s (ConocoPhillips) Glenpool South tank farm in
Glenpool, Oklahoma, exploded and burned as it was being filled with diesel. The tank,
designated tank 11, had previously contained gasoline, which had been removed from the
tank earlier in the day. The tank contained between 7,397 and 7,600 barrels of diesel at the
time of the explosion. The resulting fire burned for about 21 hours and damaged two other
storage tanks in the area. The cost of the accident, including emergency response,
environmental remediation, evacuation, lost product, property damage, and claims, was
$2,357,483. There were no injuries or fatalities. Nearby residents were evacuated, and
schools were closed for 2 days.
Accident Narrative
Tank 11 contained about 8,710 barrels2 of gasoline on the afternoon of the
accident. The ConocoPhillips operator who was on duty at the time of the accident stated
that when she reported for work at Glenpool Terminal at about 3:30 p.m.3 on April 7,
2003, a transfer of gasoline from tank 11 at Glenpool South tank farm, a nearby
ConocoPhillips facility, to tankage at Glenpool Terminal, was in progress. Explorer
Pipeline Company (Explorer) was scheduled to deliver a batch of diesel into tank 11 about
8:30 p.m., and before that time, the operator would need to complete the transfer of
gasoline to Glenpool Terminal and remove the gasoline that remained in the manifold
piping and the piping to tank 11. The gasoline from the piping would be transferred to tank
12 at Glenpool South tank farm.4
1 Unless otherwise specified, the times used in this report are central daylight time.
2 A barrel is a liquid measure that, for petroleum, is equal to 42 U.S. gallons.
3 Times in this section are from interviews with ConocoPhillips, Explorer Pipeline Company, and
American Electric Power personnel, ConocoPhillips and Explorer Pipeline computer data, the Glenpool fire
captain’s summary report, the Glenpool police daily radio log, ConocoPhillips incident tracking notification
data, and the Explorer Pipeline Company batch end report.
4 The diesel delivery normally would have been to tank 8, but because of scheduling considerations,
the naphtha in tank 8 had not been shipped, making it necessary to empty tank 11 in preparation for the
scheduled diesel delivery. In 2002 and 2003, tank 11 was used to store naphtha, toluene, gasoline, and diesel.
Naphtha is a petroleum distillate used as a paint solvent, cleaning fluid, and blendstock in gasoline
production. Toluene is a petroleum distillate used as an octane booster in fuel and as a solvent in paints and
paint thinners, rubber, printing, adhesives, cosmetics, fingernail polish, lacquers, leather tanning,
disinfectants, and perfumes.

<<<PAGE 10>>>

Factual Information 2 Pipeline Accident Report
The piping system at the Glenpool South tank farm allowed products to be
delivered to and received from Explorer’s facility, which was northwest of and adjacent to
the ConocoPhillips tank farm. (See figure 1.) The piping system also allowed products to
be delivered to and received from the ConocoPhillips Glenpool Terminal (also identified
by ConocoPhillips as Glenpool Station), which was about 2.7 miles northeast of the
Glenpool South tank farm, through a 12-inch-diameter ConocoPhillips pipeline.
~ 2000 feet
Explorer Pipeline Glenpool Tank Farm
Explorer measurement
facilities & delivery valves
N
Explorer 24” line
to ConocoPhillips
12” crude
oil pipeline
30” line
to tank 11
9
8
7
12
11
Explorer 28”
mainline
ConocoPhillips Glenpool
South Tank Farm
Power lines
Figure 1. Schematic of Explorer Pipeline Glenpool tank farm and ConocoPhillips Glen-
pool South tank farm showing tank 11, pipelines, and power lines located along dike east
of Glenpool South tank farm.
About 4:00 p.m. at Glenpool Terminal, the ConocoPhillips operator obtained a
valve lineup sheet and prepared it jointly with the outgoing shift operator for the
upcoming operations. Before leaving the office for the tank farm, the operator verified
how much gasoline was in the piping system so that, once the removal operation was
complete, she could confirm that all the gasoline had been removed. She went to the
Glenpool South tank farm about 4:30 p.m. and began transferring gasoline from the
manifold piping to tank 12. When the transfer of gasoline from tank 11 to Glenpool
terminal was completed, about 5:33 p.m., she transferred the gasoline in the tank’s piping
to tank 12.

<<<PAGE 11>>>

Factual Information 3 Pipeline Accident Report
When all transfers were complete, about 6:10 p.m., the operator lined up the valves
so tank 11 could receive diesel from Explorer. ConocoPhillips representatives told
investigators that even though no gasoline remained in the tank 11 lines or manifold
piping at the conclusion of the transfer operation, about 55 barrels of gasoline remained in
the tank 11 sump5 between the sump floor and the bottom of the 30-inch-diameter
fill/drain pipe (which was about 21 inches above the sump floor).
About 6:15 p.m. on April 7, 2003, the ConocoPhillips operator went to the office
at the Explorer Glenpool tank farm and spoke with the Explorer operator. The
ConocoPhillips operator confirmed with the Explorer operator that the delivery was a
24,500-barrel batch of diesel going into tank 11, which was empty (except for the residual
gasoline in the sump). The diesel delivery was from Explorer’s 28-inch-diameter
mainline. After the diesel was measured and sampled at the Explorer Glenpool facility, the
delivery would continue through Explorer’s 24-inch-diameter line to the ConocoPhillips
30-inch-diameter line and then into tank 11. The ConocoPhillips operator also confirmed
that the maximum allowable fill amount was 75,079 barrels. The ConocoPhillips operator
then opened two valves in Explorer’s yard to line up the delivery; the delivery to
ConocoPhillips commenced when Explorer control room personnel opened the delivery
valve. Except for the opening of the delivery valve, lining up the valves, including the two
valves in Explorer’s yard, was the responsibility of the ConocoPhillips operator. About
6:30 p.m., after the valve lineup was completed, the ConocoPhillips operator returned to
Glenpool Terminal.
About 8:33 p.m., Explorer switched the delivery of diesel to the line serving
ConocoPhillips at an initial flow rate of 24,000 to 27,500 barrels per hour. The
ConocoPhillips operator stated that at about 8:55 p.m., there was a high (product) level
alarm in tank 11 and that this was odd because the delivery had just begun and tank 11 had
been empty.
The Explorer operator at the Glenpool tank farm stated that he observed a fireball
but that he was near operating pumps and did not hear an explosion. He described the
accident as a flash, followed by smoke and fire, after which the fire totally engulfed tank
11. He said he went to his truck and drove to the Explorer control room, where he called
the Explorer central control dispatcher. He said he then drove in his truck toward the fire
to verify its location. It was determined that about 8:55 p.m., after tank 11 had been filling
with diesel for about 22 minutes, the tank exploded. The fixed roof separated from the
tank shell and was blown northward and folded over on itself, coming to rest on top of the
collapsed north wall of the tank. (See figures 2 and 3.)
5 The 15-foot-diameter by 6-foot-deep sump was in the northwest area of the tank floor, which sloped
toward the sump. The design of tank 11 is discussed in more detail later in this report.

<<<PAGE 12>>>

Factual Information 4 Pipeline Accident Report
Figure 2. View of wreckage of tank 11 facing south. Note power lines and earthen dike at
left and overpressure piping at right.
Figure 3. Wreckage of tank 11.

<<<PAGE 13>>>

Factual Information 5 Pipeline Accident Report
The Explorer operator then returned to the Explorer control room, and about
8:59 p.m. closed a valve to stop the diesel delivery to ConocoPhillips and switched the
delivery to other tankage in the Explorer yard. At this time, the ConocoPhillips facility
was isolated from Explorer's piping system. The Explorer operator called and informed
the Explorer central control dispatcher that the delivery had been switched. He also called
the operator at the ConocoPhillips Glenpool Terminal.
About this same time, the ConocoPhillips operator was calling the Explorer
operator. The Explorer operator told the ConocoPhillips operator about the ball of fire,
which they concluded was a tank on fire at the ConocoPhillips Glenpool South tank farm.
The ConocoPhillips operator asked that the delivery be stopped. The two operators agreed
that the Explorer operator would call 911 while the ConocoPhillips operator notified her
supervisor.
After the Explorer operator called 911, he called his supervisor and asked that the
supervisor contact Explorer central control and have controllers shut down the 28-inch
pipeline that was supplying the diesel to the Explorer facility. Explorer shut down its 28-
inch-diameter pipeline at Glenpool tank farm at about 9:35 p.m. and had all tank and
header valves closed by about 9:45 p.m. Explorer’s incident command was initially set up
at 9:33 p.m. in the Glenpool tank farm control room and was moved to a conference room
at 10:40 p.m.
A resident who was inside her house, about 1,000 feet east of tank 11, reported
hearing a sound like thunder that rattled her house. She said she exited her house less than
30 seconds later, at which time there was a second explosion, this one with a higher
pitched sound than the first. She observed that the north side of the tank had collapsed and
was on fire and that the wind was blowing the flames south.
Power poles owned by American Electric Power (AEP)6 were east of the tank farm
over a wall on the dike that surrounded the tank farm. The electric power facilities
included three conductor wires and two shield wires7 supported by a single crossbar on
dual wooden poles. Just before 6:00 a.m. on April 8, one or more wires on these poles fell
to the ground. (See figure 4.) A fire then started in the unburned diesel that was being
contained in the dike north of tank 11.
About 6:10 a.m. on April 8, 2003, crude oil at 550 pounds per square inch, gauge
(psig) was released from aboveground piping between tanks 7 and 8 inside the dike after
the piping was engulfed in fire started by the power lines. The piping system provided
overpressure protection for ConocoPhillips’ 12-inch-diameter crude oil pipeline. An
isolation flange assembly in the piping failed because of the fire, allowing the pressurized
crude oil to spray the surrounding area through the loosened flange assembly. By
6:17 a.m., ConocoPhillips had shut down the pipeline pumps and closed the remotely
operated valves in the pipeline.
6 AEP, which is based in Columbus, Ohio, operates an electricity transmission and distribution grid and
is the Nation’s largest electricity generator.
7 A shield wire is a grounded conductor installed to shield a phase conductor from a direct lightning strike.

<<<PAGE 14>>>

Factual Information 6 Pipeline Accident Report
Figure 4. View of downed AEP power lines on east dike wall.
The ConocoPhillips Glenpool area supervisor initially estimated that about 7,400
barrels of diesel were in tank 11 at the time of the explosion. This figure was different
from the 8,420 barrels read by Explorer’s meter because some product was in the piping
system downstream of the meter on its way to tank 11 when the explosion occurred.
Safety Board investigators calculated the amount of diesel that was in tank 11 at
the time of the explosion. These calculations were based on the amount of gasoline that
was in the tank 11 sump when delivery of diesel began, the quantity of diesel metered by
Explorer during the delivery, the diesel that was metered after the explosion but that did
not enter tank 11, and the quantity of diesel that remained in the previously empty delivery
manifold and tank 11 piping at the time of the explosion. Based on these calculations, tank
11 contained between 7,397 and 7,600 barrels of liquid (diesel and a small amount of
gasoline) at the time of the explosion.
Emergency Response
The Glenpool Fire Department received a 911 report of tank explosion and fire at
9:00 p.m. and was on scene by 9:06 p.m., at which time tank 11 had collapsed and was
engulfed by flames 75 feet high.

<<<PAGE 15>>>

Factual Information 7 Pipeline Accident Report
The emergency response eventually involved 13 fire departments and firefighting
personnel from ConocoPhillips, Sun Refinery, and Williams Fire and Hazard Control.
ConocoPhillips had preplanned with Sun Refinery for mutual assistance in firefighting.
Initially, the fire departments applied foam from the west side of the dike between tanks 7
and 12 and placed it around the burning tank so that the wind would disperse the foam to
contain the ground fire. However, the manner in which the tank collapsed hindered the
application of foam to the tank. Firefighters also applied water to tank 12, which contained
gasoline, to cool it. Explorer and ConocoPhillips checked the dike drain valves to ensure
that they were closed. After the power lines fell and diesel in the north area of the dike
caught fire, a fire started inside tank 8 (which contained naphtha) in the area of the internal
floating roof seal. This fire eventually extinguished itself, and the heat from the internal
fire damaged tank 8. Also, the burning diesel in the north area of the dike caused a flange
assembly in the crude oil pipeline overpressure protection system to fail and release crude
oil in the area.
The ConocoPhillips Glenpool area supervisor stated that because of a concern
about the quantity of foam available, he called ConocoPhillips in Ponca City for additional
supplies. Another ConocoPhillips employee called the Sinclair Refinery and the Tulsa
airport and asked for information about available foam supplies. A staging area was set up
to receive foam deliveries.
In addition to a family living approximately 1,000 feet east of the tank farm, about
300 families living near the tank farm were evacuated. This was a voluntary evacuation
that was lifted on the afternoon of April 9. ConocoPhillips provided housing for the
evacuees. Nearby schools were closed for 2 days.
Several AEP employees called the AEP transmission system operator between
9:00 p.m. and 9:30 p.m. to notify him of the accident, but he had already seen the fire on
the television news. He stated that he knew the AEP power lines were near the fire.
About midnight, ConocoPhillips personnel called the AEP dispatcher and
requested that an AEP representative inspect the power lines near and to the east of the
tank, because the flames were impinging on them. At 12:30 a.m. on April 8, an AEP
servicer was dispatched to the site, and by 1:14 a.m., he had inspected the power lines and
reported to the transmission system operator. No sag in the lines was observed, and the
servicer, who did not communicate with any incident command staff, returned home. He
did suggest to the AEP transmission system operator that an AEP representative inspect
the wooden power pole near the fire, but there is no record of action being taken.
About 3:43 a.m., the incident command noted that the wind had shifted to the east,
but the tank 11 fire appeared contained, the cooling operation on tanks 7 and 12 was
successful, and the incident appeared to be stable. Within an hour, however, the fire in
tank 11 was worse, possibly because the firefighting foam inside the tank was degrading.
About 5:00 a.m., after having been contacted again by on-scene personnel at
4:45 a.m., the AEP dispatcher again called the servicer at home. The transmission system
operator documented in his log that the fire had restarted and was worse than before and

<<<PAGE 16>>>

Factual Information 8 Pipeline Accident Report
that AEP should recheck the lines. The servicer returned to the scene at about 5:30 a.m.
and observed that the conductor closest to the fire now had a slight sag. This indicated that
heat from the fire was affecting the power line. Incident command was notified that the
servicer was on site, but the servicer did not check in or otherwise communicate with
incident command. About 20 minutes later, one or more wires fell onto the diked area east
of the tanks and the diesel that was contained inside that area of the dike ignited.
The AEP transmission system operator stated that any decision to deenergize the
lines was to be made by him based on information provided by the on-site inspectors and
an AEP field representative. He stated that if these lines had been deenergized, power
would have been cut to the AEP substation at an Explorer pump station (not at the
Glenpool tank farm) and to the pump station. No other outages would have been expected,
because the system would have automatically rerouted power.
The AEP transmission system operator stated that his emergency response training
had not included training for nonelectrical issues. He said his training had involved neither
visits to the ConocoPhillips Glenpool South tank farm nor face-to-face meetings with
ConocoPhillips personnel. The AEP field representative stated that his training had been
primarily on the job and that he had gained experience in actual emergencies.
Meteorological Information
No lightning was reported or noted in the area at the time of the explosion. The
temperature was about 52° F, and the relative humidity was 54 percent. The wind was
from the north at 7 mph gusting to 16 mph.
ConocoPhillips Glenpool Facilities
The ConocoPhillips8 Glenpool South tank farm, constructed between 1978 and
1981, was originally a Conoco facility and consisted of four storage tanks, which were
designated 7, 8, 11, and 12, and one smaller tank, designated 9, that was used for mixed
products. The tanks were inside a dike consisting of earthen walls and a crushed rock
surface. Outside the dike were a control building, valve manifolds, product pumps, a
vacuum pump and tank, and an underground sump connected to the vacuum tank.
Except for tank 9, the tanks had a “drain dry” design. The floor of tank 11 was
sloped to a sump inside the tank, and the 30-inch-diameter common fill/drain piping
terminated in the sump. When the tank was drained dry, the only liquid that remained in
the tank was approximately 55 barrels in the sump below the bottom of the fill/drain
piping.
8 ConocoPhillips was founded in 2002 when Conoco, Inc., and Phillips Petroleum Company merged.

<<<PAGE 17>>>

Factual Information 9 Pipeline Accident Report
Tank 11 and Appurtenances
ConocoPhillips representatives told investigators that no as-built design or
construction drawings for tank 11 could be found. According to ConocoPhillips, tanks 11
and 12 were both constructed in 1981 and were similar in design and construction.
The following information was obtained from the tank nameplates, the inspection
report from the tank 11 external inspection performed in July 2000, the construction
specification for tanks 11 and 12, a ConocoPhillips as-built drawing of the tank 11 and
tank 12 sump, and photographic evidence and known data from tank 12.9 Tank 11 was a
48-foot-high by 109-foot-diameter welded steel storage tank with a cone-type fixed roof
and an internal floating roof (see figure 5). The purpose of a floating roof is to minimize
emissions and evaporative losses. It floated on pontoons on top of the product and was
equipped with legs that supported the roof when product was drained from the tank and
the volume of liquid in the tank decreased to the level at which the roof no longer floated.
The ability to “land” the roof, meaning that the roof was sitting on and fully supported by
the legs, also prevented it from being damaged by contacting the tank floor. The legs
typically are set so the roof is about 3 feet above the tank floor but they can be set at
approximately 6 feet to facilitate personnel entering the tank and working under the roof.
Pressure/vacuum vent
in floating roof
Vent in tank roof and shell
Internal floating roof
(with straps holding pontoons)
Seal around
floating roof
10" diameter
pontoon
Drain tube
Support leg for roof
(with sleeves at pontoon)
product
Flow
Sump cover
Sump
Tank dimensions: 109' diameter x 48‘ high
(drawing not to scale)
30” diameter
fill/drain pipe
Figure 5. Diagram of storage tank showing float
- **truncated:** true
- **body characters:** 131177
