{"operation":"document","citation":"P-70-001 through P-70-027","title":"NTSB Safety Recommendation Letter P-70-001 through P-70-027","source_type":"guidance","agency":"National Transportation Safety Board","status":"guidance","official":true,"published_on":"1969-12-04","effective_on":"1969-12-04","summary":"Official NTSB transmittal letter for safety recommendations P-70-001 through P-70-027, issued 1969-12-04.","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/ntsb-transmittal-letter-p70-1-27.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/ntsb-transmittal-letter-p70-1-27.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/ntsb-transmittal-letter-p70-1-27","source_url":"https://www.ntsb.gov/safety/safety-recs/recletters/P70_1_27.pdf","body":"Page 1\n- 66 - IV. RECOMMENDATIONS (Listed after the recommendations a r e numbers of conclusions upon which such recommendations a r e based. ) The Safety Board recommends that: 1. The Office of Pipeline Safety of the Department of Transportation take the following actions: 7 6 , - I (a) Conduct a study to determine the feasibility of requiring that pre ssure regulators in s e r i e s be placed in separate vaults o r buildings for protection against fires and explosions, and determine the minimum distance of separation of regulators. (Conclusion 3 . ) (b) Include in i t s proposed standards a require- ment that before valves separating gas systems of different p r e s s u r e s a r e operated, gauges be tapped in on both sides of the valve so that changes in p r e s s u r e before, during, and after operation of the valves can be determined. (Conclusion 1. ) 7 0 - 3 (c) Include in i t s proposed standards a specified minimum safe distance between a regulator and its shutoff valve, and a requirement that emergency shutoff valves be placed in under- ground valve boxes o r other readily accessible locations separate f r o m regulator vaults o r enclosures. (Conclusion 3 . ) 7& -4 (d) Jnclude in its proposed standards a requirement that g a s companies establish educational pro- g r a m s to enable customers and the general public to recognize g a s e m e rgency situations and, further, to provide necessary information to notify companies immediately. (Conclusion 6 . ) .\n\nPage 2\n+?a -5 70 (e) Use the corrosion standards of the National Association of Corrosion Engineers entitled \"Control of External Corrosion in Underground o r Submerged Metallic Pipeline Systems\" as a guideline in formulating Federal standards. (Conclusion 15.) (f) Conduct a study to determine the feasibility of requiring g a s shutoff valves on all services, located outside of buildings in readily a c c e s - sible locations for use in emergencies. Further, G use the results of such study in formulating Federal standards and in consultations with the States in connection with their standards for existing systems. (Conclusion 18. ) 7. - 7 (g) Include in its proposed standards a requirement that relief devices be provided for low-pressure distribution systems which could be over- pressured by interconnected high-pressure gas. If relief devices would present a hazard, an automatic shutoff device should be installed a t each unprotected source of high-pressure gas. It is not intended that this recommendation apply to high-pressure gas connected to a low- pressure system by means of a regulator station provided with a suitable device to prevent accidental ove r p r e s s w i n g . (Conclusion 2. ) 7 O - 2 (h) Include in its proposed standards a requirement that surveys be made of existing systems to determine the extent of corrosion damage and to replace o r further cathodically protect those facilities> found corroded beyond a specified minimum and, further, use the National Association of Corrosion Engineers standard as a guide. (Conclusion 15. ) 70 - 7 (i) Include in its prbposed standards a requirement that existing regulator stations be upgraded to comply with the USAS B31.8 standards for newly constructed regulator stations. (Conclusions 2, 3.) c\n\nPage 3\n- 6 8 - 4 '7 3 (j) Include in its proposed standards a requirement that a leakage survey, as presently defined in section 852.21 of USAS B31.8, be conducted ,<; prior to conversion of low-pressure distribution systems to higher pressure systems; also, that such surveys be conducted a t one o r m o r e p r e s - s u r e increments and, finally, after the desired p r e s s u r e has been attained. (Conclusion 9. ) (k) Include i n its proposed standards the requirement that all gas utilities use written plans for con- 7 - 1 1 versions of low-pressure distribution systems to higher pressure. (Conclusion 8 . ) 2 . The Indiana Public Service Commission take the following actions: (a) Review the training procedures used by NIPSCO to determine their adequacy. (Conclusion 13. ) 7a - , 3 s - S (b) Determine whether NIPSCO's Emergency Plan complies with section 850.6 of USAS B31.8 \"Emergency Plan. I ' This plan should include direct communications between NIPSCO and the fire and police departments in emergencies. (Conclusion 12. ) (c) >a. ,4 Review NIPSCO's facilities and require correction of all regulators supplying distribution systems if those regulator stations a r e not in compliance with IJSAS B31. 8, section 846.22 for new instal- lations, and NIPSCO's \"Gas Standards. '' (Conclusions 10, 11. ) 3. NIPSCO take the following actions: 7. - /5 (a) Meet with representatives of the various police and fire departments in the a r e a which it s e r v e s in order to acquaint them with the hazards and characteristics of natural gas and methods used to control emergencies. (Conclusions 12, 6 . )\n\nPage 4\n1 I - 69 - (b) Establish a n educational program which would enable i t s customers and the general public to recognize a g a s emergency situation, yo .-'6 promptly notify NIPSCO, and take m e a s u r e s to reduce hazards of an emergency. (Conclusion 6. ) 2zd - 1 ' 7 (c) Install relief devices on all its low-pressure distribution systems which could be over- pressured by interconnected high-pressure g a s . If relief devices would present a hazard, a n automatic shutoff device should be in- stalled at each unprotected source of high- pressure gas. It is not intended that this recommendation apply to high-pressure g a s connected to a low-pressure system by means of a regulator station provided with a suitable device to prevent accidental overpressuring. (Conclusion 2 . ) (d) Furnish information to the City Engineer of Gary with respect to location of all gas lines 75 ' 1@ in the city. (Conclusion 17. ) 4. The USAS B31. 8 Committee take the following actions: , q (a) Include in its standards a requirement that relief devices be provided for low-pressure distribution systems which could be over- pressured by interconnected high-pressure gas. If relief devices would present a hazard, an automatic shutoff device should be in- stalled a t each unprotected source of high- p r e s s u r e gas. It is not intended that this recommendation apply to high-pressure g a s connected to a low-pressure system by means of a regulator station provided with a suitable device to prevent accidental overpressuring. (Conclusion 2 . ) J b (b) Include in i t s standards a requirement that surveys be made of existing systems to determine the extent of corrosion damage\n\nPage 5\n- 7 0 - and to replace o r further cathodically protect those facilities found corroded beyond a speci- fied minimum, and further, use the National Association of Corrosion Engineers Standards a s a guideline. (Copclusion 15. ) - ( / (c) Include in its standards a requirement provid- ing that existing regulator stations be upgraded to comply with the standards for newly con- strutted regulator stations. (Conclusion 2. ) ( d ) Include in i t s standards a n additional require- 4 ?/ ment that a leakage survey, as defined in J section 852.21 of USAS B31. 8, be conducted prior to conversion of low-pressure distribution systems to higher p r e s s u r e systems, that such surveys be conducted a t one o r m o r e p r e s s u r e increments, and, finally, after the desired p r e s - sure has been attained. (Conclusion 9. ) 5. All States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico take the following actions: ,- '7 7- ' (a) Include in their standards a provision that existing regulator stations supplying low-pre s sure di stri- bution systems be upgraded to comply with the standards for newly constructed regulator stations a s specified in TJSAS B31. 8. (Conclusion 2. ) ' - , (b) Include in their standards a requirement that relief devices be provided for low-pressure distribution systems which could be over- pressured by interconnected high-pressure gas. If relief devices would present a hazard, a n automatic shutoff device should be installed at each unprotected source of high-pressure g a s . It is not intended that this recommendation apply to high-pressure gas connected to a low-pressure system by means of a regulator station provided with a suitable device to prevent accidental over- pressuring. (Conclusion 2. ) 1 1 ^^ .,.,,,,. -... .\n\nPage 6\n- 7 1 - (c) Foster the use of \"rumor line\" telephone numbers throughout the States in cities and communities for use in emergencies to obtain accurate information and to reduce fear and panic. (Conclusion 7. ) Institute a program with telephone companies to list emergency numbers for g a s companies, along with listings for police, fire, FBI, etc. (Conclusion 1 9 . ) Require all g a s utilities to use written plans for conversions of low-pressure distribution systems to higher p r e s s u r e to insure that appropriate safety precautions a r e taken to protect the public. (Conclusion 8. ) BY THE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION S A F E T Y BOARD: / s / J O H N H. REED C h a i r m a n / s / OSCAR M. LAUREL Member / s / F R A N C I S H. McADAIW Member / s / LOUIS M. THAYER Member / s / I S A B E L A . BURGESS Member December 4 , 1969","truncated":false,"body_characters":9180}