{"operation":"document","citation":"PHMSA GT.2026.01","title":"2026 Gas Transmission IA Question Set","source_type":"inspection","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"guidance","official":true,"published_on":"2025-12-31","effective_on":"2025-12-31","summary":"PHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026 Assessment and Repair - Repair Criteria (O&M) 1. Repair Criteria in Non-Covered Segments Does the integrity assessment and maintenance processes include","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-2026-gas-transmission-ia-question-set.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-2026-gas-transmission-ia-question-set.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-2026-gas-transmission-ia-question-set","source_url":"https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/forms/phmsa-gas-transmission-ia-question-set-pdf","body":"<<<PAGE 1>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\nAssessment and Repair - Repair Criteria (O&M)\n1. Repair Criteria in Non-Covered Segments Does the integrity assessment and maintenance processes include\nadequate criteria for determining the need for, and timeliness of, pipeline defect repairs in non-covered segments?\n(AR.RCOM.NONCOVERED.P) 192.485(a) (192.485(b);192.485(c);192.703(b);192.710;192.711;192.713;192.714)\n2. Repair Criteria in Non-Covered Segments From the review of the results of integrity assessments, did the\noperator repair conditions that posed a threat to pipeline integrity on Non-Covered segments? (AR.RCOM.NONCOVERED.R)\n192.485(a) (192.485(b);192.485(c);191.23(a)(1);192.703(b);192.710;192.711;192.713)\n3. Field Inspection - Remedial Actions (OM) Is anomaly remediation and documentation of remediation adequate\nfor all segments? (AR.RCOM.REMEDIATIONOM.O) 192.485(a) (192.485(b);192.485(c);192.710;192.711;192.713)\n4. Alternative Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule)? If the\npipeline operates using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule), do the processes\nmeet the requirements of the permit or 192.620? (AR.RCOM.RCAMAOP.P) 192.620(d)\n5. Alternative Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule)? If the\npipeline operates using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule), from a review of\nselected records, were required repairs performed? (AR.RCOM.RCAMAOP.R) 192.620(d)\n6. Repair Criteria in Type B and C Gas Gathering Pipelines Do maintenance procedures include adequate\ncriteria for determining the need for, and timeliness of, pipeline repairs in gas gathering pipelines? (AR.RCOM.GGREMEDIATION.P)\n192.485(a) (192.9(d)(2);192.9(e)(1)(ii);192.453;192.485(b))\n7. Repair Criteria in Type B and C Gas Gathering Pipelines From the review of records, did the operator\nrepair or replace pipe to permanently restore the serviceability of the pipe? (AR.RCOM.GGREMEDIATION.R) 192.485(a)\n(191.23(a)(1);191.23(b)(1);192.9(d)(2);192.9(e)(1)(ii);192.453;192.485(b))\n8. Field Inspection - Gas Gathering Remedial Actions Is operator's remediation and documentation of\nremediation adequate? (AR.RCOM.GGREMEDIATION.O) 192.485(a) (192.453;192.459;192.485(b))\nGT.2026.01 Page 1 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 2>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n9. Receiving Notices Do records indicate receiving, identifying, classifying and communication of notices of events\nrequiring immediate response in accordance with procedures? (EP.ERG.NOTICES.R) 192.615(a)(1) (192.9(e))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\nAssessment and Repair - Confirmatory Direct Assessment\n1. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel Who Evaluate CDA Results Does the process require\nthat operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate CDA assessment results meet appropriate\ntraining, experience, and qualification criteria? (AR.CDA.CDAREVQUAL.P) 192.915(a) (192.915(b))\n2. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel Who Evaluate CDA Results Do records demonstrate\nthat operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, are qualified for\nthe tasks they perform? (AR.CDA.CDAREVQUAL.R) 192.947(h) (192.915(a);192.915(b))\n3. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel Who Evaluate CDA Results From the observation of\nselected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review\nassessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? (AR.CDA.CDAREVQUAL.O) 192.915(a) (192.915(b))\n4. CDA Plan Is an adequate Confirmatory Direct Assessment Plan in place? (AR.CDA.CDAPLAN.P) 192.931(a)\n(192.931(b);192.931(c);192.931(d))\n5. External Corrosion Plan Do records indicate that the external corrosion plan was properly implemented?\n(AR.CDA.CDAEXTCORR.R) 192.947(h) (192.931(b))\n6. Internal Corrosion Plan Do records demonstrate that the internal corrosion plan was properly implemented?\n(AR.CDA.CDAINTCORR.R) 192.947(h) (192.931(c))\n7. Remediation of Indications Do records demonstrate that the next assessment should have been accelerated?\n(AR.CDA.CDAINDICATION.R) 192.947(h) (192.931(d))\nGT.2026.01 Page 2 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 3>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n8. CDA Does the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats identified using\nconfirmatory direct assessment? (AR.CDA.CDACORR.P) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\n9. CDA Do records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats identified by CDA\nas required? (AR.CDA.CDACORR.R) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\nAssessment and Repair - External Corrosion Direct Assessment\n(ECDA)\n1. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel Who Evaluate ECDA Results Does the process require\nthat operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate ECDA assessment results meet appropriate\ntraining, experience, and qualification criteria? (AR.EC.ECDAREVQUAL.P) 192.915(a) (192.915(b))\n2. ECDA Pre-Assessment Do records demonstrate that the ECDA pre-assessment process complied with NACE SP0502-\n2010 Section 3 and 192.925(b)(1)? (AR.EC.ECDAPREASSESS.R) 192.947(g) (192.925(b)(1))\n3. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel Who Evaluate ECDA Results Do records demonstrate\nthat operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct ECDA assessments or review and analyze assessment results\nare qualified for the tasks they perform? (AR.EC.ECDAREVQUAL.R) 192.947(g) (192.915(a);192.915(b))\n4. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel Who Evaluate ECDA Results From the observation of\nselected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review\nassessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? (AR.EC.ECDAREVQUAL.O) 192.915(a) (192.915(b))\n5. ECDA Plan Is an adequate ECDA plan and process in place for conducting ECDA? (AR.EC.ECDAPLAN.P) 192.925(a)\n(192.925(b))\n6. Integration of ECDA Results with other Information Is the process for integrating ECDA results with other\ninformation adequate? (AR.EC.ECDAINTEGRATION.P) 192.917(b) (ASME B31.8S-2018 Section 4.5)\nGT.2026.01 Page 3 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 4>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n7. Integration of ECDA Results with other Information Do records demonstrate that the operator integrated\nother data/information when evaluating data/results? (AR.EC.ECDAINTEGRATION.R) 192.947(g) (192.917(b))\n8. ECDA Region Identification Do records demonstrate that the operator identified ECDA Regions?\n(AR.EC.ECDAREGION.R) 192.947(g) (192.925(b)(1))\n9. ECDA Indirect Examination Do records demonstrate that ECDA indirect inspection process complied with NACE SP\n0502-2010 Section 4 and ASME B31.8S-2018, Section 6.4? (AR.EC.ECDAINDIRECT.R) 192.947(g) (192.925(b)(2))\n10. ECDA Direct Examination Do records demonstrate that excavations, direct examinations, and data collection were\nperformed in accordance with NACE SP 0502-2010, Sections 5 and 6.4.2 and ASME B31.8S-2018, Section 6.4?\n(AR.EC.ECDADIRECT.R) 192.947(g) (192.925(b)(3))\n11. ECDA Direct Examination Were ECDA direct examinations adequately conducted? (AR.EC.ECDADIRECT.O)\n192.925(b)(3)\n12. Quality of ECDA Data Analysis Do records demonstrate that an analysis of the ECDA data and other information\nwas adequate to identify areas where external corrosion activity is most likely? (AR.EC.ECDAANALYSIS.R) 192.947(g)\n(192.925(b)(4);192.933(b))\n13. ECDA Change Control Have criteria and internal notification processes been established and implemented for any\nchanges in the ECDA plan? (AR.EC.ECDAPLANMOC.P) 192.947(g) (192.925(b)(3)(iii);192.911(k))\n14. ECDA Change Control Do records demonstrate that changes in the ECDA plan have been implemented and\ndocumented? (AR.EC.ECDAPLANMOC.R) 192.947(g) (192.925(b)(3)(iii))\n15. ECDA Post-Assessment Do records demonstrate that the requirements for post-assessment were met?\n(AR.EC.ECDAPOSTASSESS.R) 192.947(g) (192.925(b)(4))\n16. AMAOP ECDA If ECDA was performed on segments (as allowed by §192.620(d)(9)(iii)), were all ECDA assessment\nrequirements completed? (AR.EC.ECDAMAOP.R) 192.947(g) (192.620(d)(9)(iii);192.620(d)(10)(i);192.620(d)(10)(iii))\nGT.2026.01 Page 4 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 5>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n17. AMAOP ECDA If ECDA was performed on segments (as allowed by §192.620(d)(9)(iii)), were all ECDA assessment\nrequirements completed? (AR.EC.ECDAMAOP.O) 192.620(d)(9)(iii) (192.620(d)(10)(i);192.620(d)(10)(iii))\n18. External Corrosion Does the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant external\ncorrosion threats? (AR.EC.ECCORR.P) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\n19. External Corrosion Do records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant external\ncorrosion threats as required? (AR.EC.ECCORR.R) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\nAssessment and Repair - Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment\n(ICDA)\n1. ICDA Plan Pre-Assessment Is an ICDA plan and process in place prior to conducting the pre-assessment step of\nICDA? (AR.IC.ICDAPLANPRE.P) 192.927(c) (192.927(a);192.927(b))\n2. ICDA Plan Indirect Inspection Is an ICDA plan and process in place prior to conducting the indirect inspection step\nin the ICDA process? (AR.IC.ICDAPLANINDIRECT.P) 192.927(c) (192.927(a);192.927(b))\n3. ICDA Plan Detailed Examination Is an ICDA plan and process in place prior to conducting the detailed examination\nstep of the ICDA process? (AR.IC.ICDAPLANEXAM.P) 192.927(c) (192.927(a);192.927(b);192.485;192.712;192.714;192.933)\n4. ICDA Plan Post Assessment Is an ICDA plan and process in place prior to conducting the post assessment\nmonitoring? (AR.IC.ICDAPLANPOST.P) 192.927(c) (192.927(a);192.927(b);192.485;192.712;192.714;192.933)\n5. ICDA Pre-Assessment Do records demonstrate that the requirements for an ICDA pre-assessment were met?\n(AR.IC.ICDAPREASSESS.R) 192.947(g)\n6. ICDA Region Identification Do records demonstrate that ICDA Regions were adequately identified?\n(AR.IC.ICDAREGION.R) 192.947(g) (192.927(c)(2);192.927(c)(5))\nGT.2026.01 Page 5 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 6>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n7. Identification of Locations for Indirect Inspection Do records demonstrate that sites where internal\ncorrosion may be present were properly identified? (AR.IC.ICDAINDIRECT.R) 192.947(g) (192.927(c)(2);192.927(c)(5))\n8. Direct Examination Inspection of Identified Locations Do records demonstrate the operator performed\ndetailed examinations of locations identified during the Indirect Inspection? (AR.IC.ICDADIRECT.R) 192.947(g)\n(192.927(c)(3);192.927(c)(5))\n9. Post-Assessment Evaluation and Monitoring Do records demonstrate that the operator assessed the\neffectiveness of the ICDA process? (AR.IC.ICDAPOSTASSESS.R) 192.947(g)\n(192.927(c)(4)(i);192.927(c)(4)(ii);192.927(c)(4)(iii)(A);192.477)\n10. Quality of ICDA Data Analysis Do records demonstrate that sufficient data was used to complete the ICDA\nanalysis to identify the internal corrosion threats to the pipeline? (AR.IC.ICDAANALYSIS.R) 192.947(g) (192.927(c);192.933(b))\n11. ICDA Plan Is an ICDA plan and process in place for conducting ICDA? (AR.IC.ICDAPLAN.P) 192.927(c)\n(192.927(a);192.927(b))\n12. AMAOP ICDA If the pipeline is operated using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80%\nSMYS Rule) were required ICDA assessments performed? (AR.IC.ICDAMAOP.R) 192.947(g)\n(192.620(d)(9);192.620(d)(10);192.927)\n13. P&M Measures (Internal Corrosion) Does the process adequately account for taking required actions to address\nsignificant internal corrosion threats related to internal corrosion? (AR.IC.ICCORR.P) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\n14. P&M Measures (Internal Corrosion) Do records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address\nsignificant internal corrosion threats as required? (AR.IC.ICCORR.R) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\n15. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel Who Evaluate ICDA Results Does the process require\nthat operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate ICDA assessment results meet appropriate\ntraining, experience, and qualification criteria? (AR.IC.ICDAREVQUAL.P) 192.915(a) (192.915(b))\nGT.2026.01 Page 6 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 7>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n16. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel Who Evaluate ICDA Results Do records demonstrate\nthat operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct ICDA assessments or review and analyze assessment results,\nare qualified for the tasks they perform? (AR.IC.ICDAREVQUAL.R) 192.947(g) (192.915(a);192.915(b))\n17. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel Who Evaluate ICDA Results From the observation of\nselected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review\nassessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? (AR.IC.ICDAREVQUAL.O) 192.915(a) (192.915(b))\nAssessment and Repair - Stress Corrosion Cracking Direct\nAssessment (SCCDA)\n1. SCCDA Preassessment Plan Does the SCCDA plan include requirements for preassessment?\n(AR.SCC.SCCDAPLANPRE.P) 192.929(b)\n2. SCCDA Indirect Inspection Plan Is an adequate SCCDA plan developed prior to indirect inspections?\n(AR.SCC.SCCDAPLANINDIRECT.P) 192.929(b) (192.929(b)(2))\n3. SCCDA Direct Examination Plan Is an adequate plan developed prior to performing SCCDA?\n(AR.SCC.SCCDAPLANDIRECT.P) 192.929(b) (192.929(b)(3))\n4. SCCDA Post Assessment Plan Is an adequate SCCDA plan developed prior to post assessment requirements?\n(AR.SCC.SCCDAPLANPOST.P) 192.929(b) (192.929(b)(5))\n5. SCCDA Mitigate Is an adequate plan developed for remediating and mitigating SCC once discovered?\n(AR.SCC.SCCDAMITIG.P) 192.929(b)(4) (NACE SP0204, Section 5.5.1, 6.1.2 and 6.2.1;ASME B31.8S, Appendix A3 and A3.4)\n6. Collect and Evaluate Data Do records demonstrate that data was collected and evaluated? (AR.SCC.SCCDADATA.R)\n192.947(g) (192.929(b)(1))\nGT.2026.01 Page 7 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 8>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n7. Indirect Inspection Do records demonstrate that at least two Indirect Inspections were conducted using\ncomplementary measurement tools appropriate for the pipeline segment? (AR.SCC.SCCDAINSPECTION.R) 192.947(g)\n(192.929(b)(2))\n8. Direct Examination Do records demonstrate that a minimum of three direct examinations for SCC were performed\nwithin the covered pipeline segment? (AR.SCC.SCCDAEXAM.R) 192.947(g) (192.929(b)(3))\n9. Assessment Method (Near Neutral and High pH SCC) Do records demonstrate that the operator mitigated\nthe threat of SCC, if found? (AR.SCC.SCCDAMITIG.R) 192.947(g) (192.929(b)(4);NACE SP0204-2008, Section 5.5.1, 6.1.2, and\n6.2.1;ASME B31.8S, Appendix A4)\n10. Assessment Method (Near Neutral and High pH SCC) From field observations, was SCCDA performed in\naccordance with 192.929 and the SCCDA plan? (AR.SCC.SCCDAMETHOD.O) 192.929\n11. Assessing for Near Neutral SCC From the review of the results of selected integrity assessments, was the pipeline\nevaluated for near neutral SCC? (AR.SCC.SCCDANEARNEUTRAL.R) 192.947(g) (192.929(b))\n12. Reassessment Interval From the review of the results of selected integrity assessments, did the operator determine\na reassessment interval based on SCCDA results? (AR.SCC.SCCDAREASSESSINTRVL.R) 192.947(d) (192.939(a)(3);ASME B31.8S-\n2018)\n13. Alternative Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule)? If the\npipeline operates using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule), from a review of\nselected records, were required SCCDA assessments performed? (AR.SCC.SCCDAAMAOP.R) 192.620(d)\n(192.620(d)(9);192.620(d)(10))\n14. SCC Corrosion Threats Does the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant\ncorrosion threats found following SCCDA? (AR.SCC.SCCCORR.P) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\n15. SCC Corrosion Threats Do records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion\nthreats as required following SCCDA? (AR.SCC.SCCCORR.R) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\nGT.2026.01 Page 8 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 9>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n16. Qualification of Operator Personnel Who Evaluate SCCDA Results Does the process require that\noperator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate SCCDA assessment results meet appropriate training,\nexperience, and qualification criteria? (AR.SCC.SCCDAREVQUAL.P) 192.915(a) (192.915(b))\n17. Qualification of Operator Personnel Who Evaluate SCCDA Results Do records demonstrate that\noperator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, are qualified for the\ntasks they perform? (AR.SCC.SCCDAREVQUAL.R) 192.947(e) (192.915(a);192.915(b))\n18. Qualification of Operator Personnel Who Evaluate SCCDA Results From the observation of selected\nintegrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment\nresults, qualified for the tasks they perform? (AR.SCC.SCCDAREVQUAL.O) 192.915(a) (192.915(b))\nAssessment and Repair - In-Line Inspection (Smart Pigs)\n1. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel (including Supervisors) Who Evaluate ILI\nResults Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate ILI\nassessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? (AR.IL.ILIREVIEWQUAL.P) 192.915(a)\n(192.915(b);192.493)\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n2. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel (including Supervisors) Who Evaluate ILI\nResults Do records demonstrate that personnel who conduct assessments or review assessment results are qualified per the\nprocess requirements? (AR.IL.ILIREVIEWQUAL.R) 192.947(g) (192.915(a);192.915(b);192.493)\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n3. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel (including Supervisors) Who Evaluate ILI\nResults From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who\nconduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? (AR.IL.ILIREVIEWQUAL.O) 192.915(a)\n(192.915(b);192.493)\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n4. ILI Specifications Does the process assure complete and adequate vendor ILI specifications? (AR.IL.ILISPECS.P)\n192.921(a)(1) (192.933(b);192.493;192.18)\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\nGT.2026.01 Page 9 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 10>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n5. ILI Specifications Do records demonstrate that the ILI specifications were complete and adequate? (AR.IL.ILISPECS.R)\n192.947(g) (192.933(b);192.493)\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n6. IMP Assessment Methods Does the process specify the assessment methods that are appropriate for the pipeline\nspecific integrity threats? (AR.IL.ASSESSMETHOD.P) 192.919(b) (192.921(a);192.937(c);192.917;192.493;192.506)\n7. IMP Assessment Methods Do records demonstrate that the assessment methods shown in the baseline and/or\ncontinual assessment plan were appropriate for the pipeline specific integrity threats? (AR.IL.ASSESSMETHOD.R) 192.947\n(192.919(b);192.921(a);192.937(c))\n8. Validation of ILI Results Does the process for validating ILI results ensure that accurate integrity assessment results\nare obtained? (AR.IL.ILIVALIDATE.P) 192.921(a)(1) (192.937(c);192.493)\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n9. Validation of ILI Results Do records demonstrate that the operator has validated ILI assessment results per their\nprocess? (AR.IL.ILIVALIDATE.R) 192.947 (192.921(a)(1);192.493)\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n10. Validation of ILI Results From observation of field activities, do the employees and vendors validate ILI assessment\nresults per their process? (AR.IL.ILIVALIDATE.O) 192.921(a)(1) (192.493)\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n11. Integration of ILI Results with other Information Is the process for integrating ILI results with other\ninformation adequate? (AR.IL.ILIINTEGRATION.P) 192.917(b) (192.493)\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n12. Integration of ILI Results with other Information Do records demonstrate that the operator integrated\nother data/information when evaluating tool data/results? (AR.IL.ILIINTEGRATION.R) 192.947 (192.917(b);192.493)\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\nGT.2026.01 Page 10 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 11>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n13. ILI Acceptance Criteria Is the process for ILI survey acceptance criteria adequate to assure an effective\nassessment? (AR.IL.ILIACCEPCRITERIA.P) 192.921(a) (192.493)\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n14. ILI Acceptance Criteria Do records indicate adequate implementation of the process for ILI survey acceptance?\n(AR.IL.ILIACCEPCRITERIA.R) 192.947 (192.921(a);192.493)\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n15. Integrity Assessments that were Not Performed as Scheduled or Within Required\nTimeframes Do records indicate that the performance of integrity assessments has been delayed and integrity assessment\ndelays have been justified? (AR.IL.ILIDELAY.R) 192.947(d) (192.909(a);192.909(b);192.943(a);192.943(b);190.341;192.18)\n16. Alternative Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule)? For\npipelines operating under AMAOP, do processes implement the ILI requirements of 192.620(d)(9) and (10) for the entire\nsegment? (AR.IL.ILIAMAOP.P) 192.620(d) (192.493)\n17. Alternative Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule)? For\npipelines operating under AMAOP, do records indicate the ILI requirements of 192.620(d)(9) and (10) have been implemented for\nthe entire segment? (AR.IL.ILIAMAOP.R) 192.620(d) (192.493)\n18. Compliance with ILI Procedures Are O&M and IMP procedural requirements for the performance of ILI\nassessments followed? (AR.IL.ILIIMPLEMENT.O) 192.921(a)(1) (192.620(d);192.605(b);192.493)\n19. In-Line Inspection Does the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion\nthreats identified during in-line inspections? (AR.IL.ILCORR.P) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\n20. In-Line Inspection Do records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion\nthreats identified during in-line inspections? (AR.IL.ILCORR.R) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\nGT.2026.01 Page 11 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 12>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\nAssessment and Repair - Low Stress Reassessment\n1. Low Stress Reassessment Plan Is the process for performing low stress reassessment adequate?\n(AR.LSR.LSRPLAN.P) 192.941 (192.919;192.921;192.941(b);192.941(c))\n2. Baseline Assessment Do records demonstrate that a baseline assessment meeting the requirements of 192.919 and\n192.921 was performed prior to performing a low stress reassessment? (AR.LSR.LSRBA.R) 192.947(d)\n(192.919(c);192.921(d);192.941(a);192.506)\n3. External Corrosion Do records demonstrate that the requirements of §192.941(b) were implemented when performing\nlow stress reassessment for external corrosion? (AR.LSR.LSREXTCORR.R) 192.947(d) (192.941(b))\n4. Internal Corrosion Do records demonstrate that the requirements of §192.941(c) were implemented when performing\nlow stress reassessment for internal corrosion? (AR.LSR.LSRINTCORR.R) 192.947(d) (192.941(c))\n5. LSR - Corrosion Does the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats\nfollowing a LSR? (AR.LSR.LSRCORR.P) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\n6. LSR - Corrosion Do records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats as\nrequired following a LSR? (AR.LSR.LSRCORR.R) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\nAssessment and Repair - Integrity Assessment Via Pressure Test\n1. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel Who Evaluate Pressure Test Results Does the\nprocess require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate pressure test assessment results\nmeet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? (AR.PTI.PRESSTESTREVQUAL.P) 192.915(a)\n(192.915(b);192.921(a)(4))\n2. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel Who Evaluate Pressure Test Results Do records\ndemonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct or review pressure test assessment results are\nqualified for the tasks they perform? (AR.PTI.PRESSTESTREVQUAL.R) 192.947(g) (192.915(a);192.915(b))\nGT.2026.01 Page 12 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 13>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n3. Test Acceptance Criteria and Procedures Were test acceptance criteria and processes sufficient to assure the\nbasis for an acceptable pressure test? (AR.PTI.PRESSTESTACCEP.P) 192.503(a)\n(192.503(b);192.503(c);192.503(d);192.505(a);192.505(b);192.505(c);192.505(d);192.507(a);192.507(b);192.507(c);192.513(\na);192.513(b);192.513(c);192.513(d);192.921(a)(2))\n4. Pressure Test Results Do the test records validate the pressure test? (AR.PTI.PRESSTESTRESULT.R) 192.517(a)\n(192.505(a);192.505(b);192.505(c);192.505(d);192.507(a);192.507(b);192.507(c);192.513(a);192.513(b);192.513(c);192.513(\nd);192.517(b);192.617;192.619(a);192.919(e);192.921(a)(2))\n5. Alternative Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule)? If the\npipeline operates using an alternative maximum allowable operating pressure per 192.620 (80% SMYS Rule), from a review of\nselected records, were required pressure test assessments performed? (AR.PTI.PRESSTESTAMAOP.R) 192.517(a)\n(192.505(a);192.517(b);192.620(c)(4);192.620(d)(9);192.620(d)(10))\n6. Pressure Test Completion From field operations was the pressure test performed in accordance with Subpart J\nrequirements and the process requirements? (AR.PTI.PRESSTESTCOMPLETE.O) 192.503(a)\n(192.503(b);192.503(c);192.503(d);192.505(a);192.505(b);192.505(c);192.505(d);192.507(a);192.507(b);192.507(c);192.513(\na);192.513(b);192.513(c);192.513(d))\n7. PTI Does the process adequately account for taking required actions to address significant corrosion threats?\n(AR.PTI.PTICORR.P) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\n8. PTI Do records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant corrosion threats as required?\n(AR.PTI.PTICORR.R) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\n9. Assessments - Spike Hydrotests Do the procedures for selecting pipeline assessment methods specifically include\nspike hydrotests as the assessment method for detecting time-dependent threats? (AR.PTI.SPIKEHYDRO.P) 192.506(a)\n(192.505;192.710(c)(3);192.921(a)(3))\n10. Assessments - Spike Hydrotests Where time-dependent threats were an identified risk, do the records indicate\nthat a spike hydrotest was performed to “clear” any cracks that might otherwise grow during pressure reductions after the\nhydrostatic test? (AR.PTI.SPIKEHYDRO.R) 192.506(a) (192.505;192.710(c)(3);192.921(a)(3))\nGT.2026.01 Page 13 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 14>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\nAssessment and Repair - Other Technology\n1. Other Technology Has a process been developed for \"other technologies\" that provide an equivalent understanding of\nthe condition of the pipe? (AR.OT.OTPLAN.P) 192.921(a)(7) (192.18)\n2. Other Technology Do records demonstrate that the assessments were performed in accordance with the process and\nvendor recommendations and that defects were identified and categorized within 180 days, if applicable? (AR.OT.OTPLAN.R)\n192.947(d) (192.921(a)(7);192.933(b))\n3. Qualification of Operator/Vendor Personnel Who Evaluate Other Technology Results Does the\nprocess require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate assessment results meet\nacceptable qualification standards? (AR.OT.OTREVQUAL.P) 192.915(a) (192.915(b);192.921(a)(7);192.493)\n4. Qualification of Operator Personnel Who Evaluate Other Technology Results Do records\ndemonstrate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results are\nqualified for the tasks they perform? (AR.OT.OTREVQUAL.R) 192.947(d) (192.915(a);192.915(b))\n5. Qualification of Operator Personnel Who Evaluate Other Technology Results From the\nobservation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct\nassessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? (AR.OT.OTREVQUAL.O) 192.915(a) (192.915(b))\n6. Other Technology Were assessments conducted using \"other technology\" adequately performed in accordance with the\nOT process? (AR.OT.OTPLAN.O) 192.921(a)(7)\n7. Other Technology - Corrosion Does the process adequately account for taking required actions to address\nsignificant corrosion threats identified using Other Technology? (AR.OT.OTCORR.P) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\n8. Other Technology - Corrosion Do records demonstrate that required actions are being taken to address significant\ncorrosion threats as required following the use of Other Technology? (AR.OT.OTCORR.R) 192.933 (192.917(e)(5))\nGT.2026.01 Page 14 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 15>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\nAssessment and Repair - Predicted Failure Pressure\n1. Anomaly Analysis - Corrosion Metal Loss Do the procedures for evaluating corrosion metal loss anomalies or\ndefects, ensure that a determination of the predicted failure pressure and the remaining life of the pipeline segment is established\nat the location of each anomaly or defect? (AR.PFP.ANOMALYMETALLOSS.P) 192.605\n(192.607;192.712(a);192.917(b);192.933(d);192.485;192.712(b))\n2. Anomaly Analysis - Dents Do the procedures for evaluating dents and other mechanical damage anomalies or\ndefects, ensure that a determination of the predicted failure pressure and the remaining life of the pipeline segment is established\nat the location of each anomaly or defect? (AR.PFP.ANOMALYDENTS.P) 192.605\n(192.607;192.712(a);192.712(b);192.933(d);192.485;192.712(c);192.712(h))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n3. Anomaly Analysis - Crack Models Do the procedures for evaluating cracks and crack like defects ensure that a\ndetermination of the predicted failure pressure and the remaining life of the pipeline segment is established at the location of each\nanomaly or defect, in accordance with §192.712(d)(1)? (AR.PFP.ANOMALYCRACKMODEL.P) 192.605\n(192.607;192.712(a);192.712(d)(1))\n4. Anomaly Analysis - Crack Growth Do the procedures detail the performance of fatigue analysis and remaining life\ncalculations for pipeline segments susceptible to cyclic fatigue or other loading conditions that could lead to fatigue crack growth?\n(AR.PFP.ANOMALYCRACKGROWTH.P) 192.605 (192.607;192.712(d)(2))\n5. Anomaly Analysis - Crack Survives Press Test Do procedures call for the calculation of the largest potential\ncrack defect sizes when analyzing potential cracks that could have survived a pressure test, specifically in the absence of any in-\nline inspection data in accordance with §192.712(d)(3)? (AR.PFP.ANOMALYCRACKSURVIVEPT.P) 192.712(d)(3)\n(192.607;192.712(a);192.712(d)(1))\n6. Anomaly Analysis - Required Data Use Do the procedures detail the use of data when performing analyses of\npredicted or assumed anomalies or defects, in accordance with §192.712(e)? (AR.PFP.ANOMALYDATAUSE.P) 192.605\n(192.607;192.712(e))\n7. Anomaly Analysis - Records Process Do procedures detail the collection, creation and retention of records\nincluding all investigations, analyses, and other actions taken in performing analyses of predicted or assumed anomalies or\ndefects, in accordance with 192.712(g)? (AR.PFP.ANOMALYRECORDS.P) 192.605 (192.607;192.712(g))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\nGT.2026.01 Page 15 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 16>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n8. Anomaly Analysis - Records Process Do procedures detail the reassessment of anomalies when an operator used\nan Engineering Critical Assessment method? (AR.PFP.ANOMALYREASSESS.P) 192.605 (192.712(h))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n9. Anomaly Analysis - Records Do the records capture all investigations, analyses and other actions taken to support\nthe analysis of predicted failure pressure in accordance with §192.712(g)? (AR.PFP.ANOMALYRECORDS.R) 192.712(g)\n(192.712(e))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\nAssessment and Repair - Repair Criteria (HCA)\n1. General Requirements Do the repair procedures detail what actions must be taken to address integrity issues?\n(AR.RCHCA.GENERAL.P) 192.907(a) (192.607;192.712;192.933(a))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n2. General Requirements Do the repair records show what actions the operator took to address integrity issues?\n(AR.RCHCA.GENERAL.R) 192.947(a) (192.607;192.712;192.933(a))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n3. Temporary Pressure Reduction Do the repair procedures require a temporary pressure reduction for making\nrepairs in covered segments? (AR.RCHCA.PRESSUREREDUC.P) 192.907(a)\n(192.18;192.712;192.933(a)(1);192.933(a)(2);192.933(d)(1))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n4. Temporary Pressure Reduction Do records demonstrate that a temporary pressure reduction was taken\nimmediately or when a repair schedule could not be met? (AR.RCHCA.PRESSUREREDUC.R) 192.947\n(192.18;192.712;192.933(a)(1);192.933(a)(2);192.933(d)(1))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n5. Discovery of Condition Do the repair procedures require properly define discovery and the required time frame for\nresponse in covered segments? (AR.RCHCA.DISCOVERY.P) 192.907 (192.933(b))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\nGT.2026.01 Page 16 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 17>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n6. Discovery of Condition Do the records show that discovery was declared in the required timeframe?\n(AR.RCHCA.DISCOVERY.R) 192.947 (192.933(b))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n7. Prioritized Scheduling Do the repair procedures discuss remediating conditions according to a prioritization schedule in\ncovered segments? (AR.RCHCA.SCHEDULE.P) 192.907(a) (192.933(c))\n8. Prioritized Scheduling Do records demonstrate that defects in covered segments were remediated according to a\nprioritization schedule? (AR.RCHCA.SCHEDULE.R) 192.947 (192.933(c))\n9. Immediate Repair Conditions Do the repair procedures cover all of the elements for making immediate repairs in\ncovered segments? (AR.RCHCA.IMMEDIATE.P) 192.907 (192.933(d)(1))\n10. Immediate Repair Conditions Do records demonstrate that all conditions requiring immediate repair were repaired\nimmediately upon discovery? (AR.RCHCA.IMMEDIATE.R) 192.947 (192.933(d)(1))\n11. One-Year Conditions Do the repair procedures cover all of the elements for making repairs in covered segments for\nOne-year conditions? (AR.RCHCA.ONEYEAR.P) 192.907 (192.933(d)(2))\n12. One-Year Conditions Do records demonstrate that all conditions meeting the one-year condition requirements were\nrepaired within one year of discovery? (AR.RCHCA.ONEYEAR.R) 192.947 (192.712;192.933(d)(2))\n13. Monitored Conditions Do the repair procedures require the operator to record and monitor conditions that meet\nmonitoring criteria in covered segments? (AR.RCHCA.MONITOR.P) 192.907 (192.933(d)(3))\n14. Monitored Conditions Do records demonstrate that all defects were properly categorized? (AR.RCHCA.MONITOR.R)\n192.947 (192.712;192.933(d)(3))\nGT.2026.01 Page 17 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 18>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n15. Crack Defects Do the repair procedures require the operator to perform direct examinations of known locations of\ncracks or crack-like defects? (AR.RCHCA.CRACK.P) 192.907 (192.712;192.933(e))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n16. Crack Defects Do the records show that the operator performed direct examinations of known locations of cracks or\ncrack-like defects? (AR.RCHCA.CRACK.R) 192.947 (192.712;192.933(e))\n17. Field Inspection - Remedial Actions Is anomaly remediation adequate for the covered segments being\nobserved? (AR.RCHCA.REMEDIATION.O) 192.933\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n18. Repair Procedures (Temporary) Do the repair procedures require the operator to take immediate temporary\nmeasures to protect the public? (AR.RCHCA.CRITERIATEMP.P) 192.605(b)(1) (192.711(a))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n19. Repair Procedures (Temporary) Do the records show that the operator took immediate temporary measures to\nprotect the public? (AR.RCHCA.CRITERIATEMP.R) 192.709 (192.711(a))\nNote: this question is presented in multiple places so you will see multiple instances of it on this report.\n20. Repair Procedures (Permanent) Do the repair procedures require the operator to make permanent repairs?\n(AR.RCHCA.CRITERIAPERM.P) 192.605(b)(1) (192.711(b))\n21. Repair Procedures (Permanent) Do the records show that the operator made permanent repairs on both non-\nintegrity management and integrity management segments of the pipeline? (AR.RCHCA.CRITERIAPERM.R) 192.709 (192.711(b))\n22. Repair Procedures (Weld Patch) Do the repair procedures prohibit the operator from using welded patches?\n(AR.RCHCA.CRITERIAWELD.P) 192.605(b)(1) (192.711(c))\n23. Repair Procedures (Weld Patch) Do the records show that the operator made repairs using welded patches?\n(AR.RCHCA.CRITERIAWELD.R) 192.709 (192.711(c))\nGT.2026.01 Page 18 of 261\n\n<<<PAGE 19>>>\n\nPHMSA - Gas Transmission (GT.2026.01) IA Question Set - January 2026\n24. Repair Procedures (Observations) Is the anomaly remediation adequate for segment being observed?\n(AR.RCHCA.CRITERIAOBSERVE.O) 192.711\nAssessment and Repair - Repair Criteria (Non-HCA)\n1. General Requirements in Non-Covered Segments Do the repair procedures detail making repairs in a safe\nmanner in non-covered segments? (AR.RCNONHCA.GENERAL.P) 192.605(a) (192.714(a);192.714(b);192.714(h))\n2. General Requirements in Non-Covered Segments Do records demonstrate that repairs were made in a safe\nman","truncated":true,"body_characters":598893}