# COLONIAL PIPELINE CO — Notice of Probable Violation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** CPF 120105001
- **title:** COLONIAL PIPELINE CO — Notice of Probable Violation
- **source type:** enforcement
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** historical
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2010-02-16
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** CLOSED notice of probable violation citing 195.401(b).
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-120105001.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-120105001.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-120105001
- **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/120105001
**body:**

Notice of Probable Violation involving COLONIAL PIPELINE CO. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulation as 195.401(b). The case was opened on 2010-02-16 and is reported as closed as of 2011-06-17. Proposed civil penalty: $92,500. Assessed civil penalty: $0. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

120105001_FinalOrder_06172011.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/120105001/120105001_FinalOrder_06172011.pdf

120105001_FinalOrder_06172011_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/120105001/120105001_FinalOrder_06172011_text.pdf

120105001_NOPV PCP_02162010.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/120105001/120105001_NOPV%20PCP_02162010.pdf

120105001_NOPV PCP_02162010_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/120105001/120105001_NOPV%20PCP_02162010_text.pdf

120105001_Operator Response to NOPV_03172010.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/120105001/120105001_Operator%20Response%20to%20NOPV_03172010.pdf

120105001_FinalOrder_06172011_text.pdf

JUN 17 2011
Mr. Tim Felt
President and Chief Executive Officer
Colonial Pipeline Company
1185 Sanctuary Parkway, Suite 100
Alpharetta, GA 30009-4738
Re: CPF No. 1-2010-5001
Dear Mr. Felt:
Enclosed please find the Final Order issued in the above-referenced case. It withdraws a finding
of violation and proposed civil penalty. Therefore, this enforcement action is now closed.
Service of the Final Order by certified mail is deemed effective upon the date of mailing, or as
otherwise provided under 49 C.F.R. § 190.5.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey D. Wiese
Associate Administrator
for Pipeline Safety
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Alan Mayberry, Deputy Associate Administrator for Field Operations, Pipeline Safety
Mr. Byron Coy, Director, Eastern Region, PHMSA
Ms. Caroline P. Sims, Senior Attorney, Colonial Pipeline Company
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED [7005 1160 0001 0075 9565]



U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590
____________________________________
)
In the Matter of )
)
Colonial Pipeline Company, ) CPF No. 1-2010-5001
)
Respondent. )
____________________________________)
FINAL ORDER
On October 17, 2006, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60117, a representative of the Virginia State
Corporation Commission, as agent for the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), conducted an on-site pipeline safety
inspection of the facilities and records of Colonial Pipeline Company (Colonial or Respondent)
in Chesapeake, Virginia. Colonial is the operator of a 5,519-mile pipeline system, which
delivers petroleum products from refineries in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama to
terminals in the South and Eastern United States.
The investigation arose out of an incident that occurred at the Chesapeake Terminal on October
16 and 17, 2006. The incident involved a breakout tank that overflowed while receiving
petroleum products from the Colonial pipeline. At the time of the incident, a valve on the
breakout tank had been left open, and a high-level alarm failed to communicate the unsafe
condition of the tank to the Colonial Operation and Control Center (OCC) in Atlanta, Georgia.
During the week prior to the incident, the Allied Terminal manager had informed the OCC that
the high-level alarms on the tank had failed.
As a result of the inspection, the Director, Eastern Region, OPS (Director), issued to Respondent,
by letter dated February 16, 2010, a Notice of Probable Violation and Proposed Civil Penalty. In
accordance with 49 C.F.R. § 190.207, the Notice proposed finding that Respondent had violated
49 C.F.R. § 195.401(b) and proposed assessing a civil penalty of $92,500 for the alleged
violation.
Colonial responded to the Notice by letters dated March 17, 2010, and April 12, 2010
(Response).
WITHDRAWAL OF ALLEGATION
The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. Part 195, as follows:



2
Item 1: The Notice alleged that Respondent violated 49 C.F.R. § 195.401(b), which as of the
date of the Notice, stated:
§ 195.401 General Requirements
(a) . . .
(b) Whenever an operator discovers any condition that could adversely
affect the safe operation of its pipeline system, it shall correct it within a
reasonable time. However, if the condition is of such a nature that it
presents an immediate hazard to persons or property, the operator may not
operate the affected part of the system until it has corrected the unsafe
condition.1
The Notice alleged that Colonial violated 49 C.F.R. § 195.401(b) by operating a part of its
pipeline system without correcting a condition that presented an immediate hazard to persons or
property. Specifically, the Notice alleged that Respondent knew that the high-level alarms on the
Chesapeake Terminal breakout tank had failed on October 9, 2006, and delivered petroleum
products to the tank on October 16 and 17, 2006, without correcting that unsafe condition.
In its Response, Colonial stated that Allied Terminals, Inc. (Allied) is the owner and operator of
the Chesapeake Terminal. Respondent further stated that Colonial relinquishes custody over the
petroleum products delivered to the Terminal at an isolating flange, that the company has no
authority over the conduct of the employees or operation of the breakout tanks that receive those
petroleum products, and that it does not use the breakout tanks at the Chesapeake Terminal for
storage, surge protection, or reinjection into its interstate pipeline system.
After considering all of the evidence, I hereby withdraw the allegation of violation.
ASSESSMENT OF PENALTY
Under 49 U.S.C. § 60122, Respondent is subject to an administrative civil penalty not to exceed
$100,000 per violation for each day of the violation, up to a maximum of $1,000,000 for any
related series of violations. In determining the amount of a civil penalty under 49 U.S.C.
§ 60122 and 49 C.F.R. § 190.225, I must consider the following criteria: the nature,
circumstances, and gravity of the violation, including adverse impact on the environment; the
degree of Respondent’s culpability; the history of Respondent’s prior offenses; the Respondent’s
ability to pay the penalty and any effect that the penalty may have on its ability to continue doing
business; and the good faith of Respondent in attempting to comply with the pipeline safety
regulations. In addition, I may consider the economic benefit gained from the violation without
any reduction because of subsequent damages, and such other matters as justice may require.
1 Section 195.401(b) was amended by Pipeline Safety: Periodic Updates of Regulatory References to Technical
Standards and Miscellaneous Edits, 75 Fed. Reg. 48593, 48607 (Aug. 11, 2010).



3
The Notice proposed a total civil penalty of $92,500 for the alleged violation of § 195.401(b).
Since the allegation has been withdrawn, the proposed penalty is not assessed.
This enforcement action is closed.
___________________________________ __________________________
Jeffrey D Wiese Date Issued
Associate Administrator
for Pipeline Safety
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 7293
