# PREMCOR PIPELINE COMPANY — Notice of Amendment

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** CPF 120105003M
- **title:** PREMCOR PIPELINE COMPANY — Notice of Amendment
- **source type:** enforcement
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** historical
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2010-03-29
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** CLOSED notice of amendment citing 195.310(b)(3), 195.310(b)(8), 195.559(e), 195.569.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-120105003m.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-120105003m.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-120105003m
- **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/120105003M
**body:**

Notice of Amendment involving PREMCOR PIPELINE COMPANY. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 195.310(b)(3),  195.310(b)(8),  195.559(e),  195.569. The case was opened on 2010-03-29 and is reported as closed as of 2010-04-16. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

120105003M_Notice of Amendment_03292010_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/120105003M/120105003M_Notice%20of%20Amendment_03292010_text.pdf

120105003M_Operator Response to NOA_04062010.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/120105003M/120105003M_Operator%20Response%20to%20NOA_04062010.pdf

120105003M_Notice of Amendment_03292010_text.pdf

U.S. Department 820 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 306
Of Transportation West Trenton, NJ 08628
Pipeline and 609.989.2171
Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
NOTICE OF AMENDMENT
EXPRESS OVERNIGHT DELIVERY
March 29, 2010
Mr. Paul Brochu
Vice President of Logistics, Operations & Development
Valero Terminaling and Distribution Company
One Valero Way
San Antonio, TX 78249-1616
CPF 120105003M
Dear Mr. Brochu:
On September 28 – October 2, 2009, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration (PHMSA), pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code inspected
Valero Terminaling and Distribution Company procedures for operations and maintenance in
Delaware City, Delaware.
On the basis of the inspection, PHMSA has identified apparent inadequacies within Valero’s
plans or procedures, as described below:
1. §195.310 Records.
(b) The record required by paragraph (a) of this section must include:
(3) The name of the operator, the name of the person responsible for making
the test, and the name of the test company used, if any.
Valero had no written procedure that requires pressure test records to include the name of the
operator, the name of the person responsible for making the test, and the name of the test
company used, if any. The Valero Operations, Maintenance, and Emergency Procedures,
Revision 2.3 (9-2009) procedures on pressure testing, Valero Hydrostatic Test Report Form,



CPF 120105003M
Valero Hydrostatic Test Planning Form Instructions, and Valero Hydrostatic Test Leak Report
were reviewed at the time of the inspection; however none of the documents contained these
provisions.
2. §195.310 Records.
(b) The record required by paragraph (a) of this section must include:
(8) An explanation of any pressure discontinuities, including test failures
that appear on the pressure recording charts.
Valero had no written procedure that requires pressure test records to include an explanation of
any pressure discontinuities, including test failures that appear on the pressure recording charts.
The Valero Operations, Maintenance, and Emergency Procedures, Revision 2.3 (9-2009)
procedures on pressure testing, Valero Hydrostatic Test Report Form, Valero Hydrostatic Test
Planning Form Instructions, and Valero Hydrostatic Test Leak Report were reviewed at the time
of the inspection, however, none of the documents contained these provisions.
3. §195.559 What coating material may I use for external corrosion control?
Coating material for external corrosion control under Sec. 195.557 must-
(e) Support any supplemental cathodic protection.
Although Valero’s Delaware City pipeline does have external coating, Valero did not have a
procedure that specifies coating material for external corrosion must support any supplemental
cathodic protection in their Operations, Maintenance, and Emergency Procedures, Revision 2.3
(5-2009).
4. §195.569 Do I have to examine exposed portions of buried pipelines?
Whenever you have knowledge that any portion of a buried pipeline is exposed,
you must examine the exposed portion for evidence of external corrosion if the pipe
is bare, or if the coating is deteriorated. If you find external corrosion requiring
corrective action under Sec. 195.585, you must investigate circumferentially and
longitudinally beyond the exposed portion (by visual examination, indirect method,
or both) to determine whether additional corrosion requiring remedial action exists
in the vicinity of the exposed portion.
Valero did not have a procedure requiring exposed portions of buried pipelines be examined for
evidence of external corrosion. While there were no procedures for this provision, repair records
were reviewed that included the required data, as well as pictures illustrating this had been done.
120105003M_Notice of Amendment_03292010 2 of 3



CPF 120105003M
Response to this Notice
This Notice is provided pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60108(a) and 49 C.F.R. § 190.237. Enclosed as
part of this Notice is a document entitled Response Options for Pipeline Operators in
Compliance Proceedings. Please refer to this document and note the response options. Be
advised that all material you submit in response to this enforcement action is subject to being
made publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your responsive material qualifies for
confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), along with the complete original document you
must provide a second copy of the document with the portions you believe qualify for
confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe the redacted information
qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b). If you do not respond within 30 days
of receipt of this Notice, this constitutes a waiver of your right to contest the allegations in this
Notice and authorizes the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety to find facts as alleged in
this Notice without further notice to you and to issue a Final Order.
If, after opportunity for a hearing, your plans or procedures are found inadequate as alleged in
this Notice, you may be ordered to amend your plans or procedures to correct the inadequacies
(49 C.F.R. § 190.237). If you are not contesting this Notice, we propose that you submit your
amended procedures to my office within 60 days of receipt of this Notice. This period may be
extended by written request for good cause. Once the inadequacies identified herein have been
addressed in your amended procedures, this enforcement action will be closed.
In correspondence concerning this matter, please refer to CPF 120105003M and, for each
document you submit, please provide a copy in electronic format whenever possible.
Sincerely,
Byron E. Coy, PE
Director, Eastern Region
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Enclosure: Response Options for Pipeline Operators in Compliance Proceedings
120105003M_Notice of Amendment_03292010 3 of 3
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 6668