# ALGONQUIN GAS TRANSMISSION, L.L.C. (SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP) — Warning Letter

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** CPF 120151024W
- **title:** ALGONQUIN GAS TRANSMISSION, L.L.C. (SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP) — Warning Letter
- **source type:** enforcement
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** historical
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2015-09-18
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** CLOSED warning letter citing 192.305.
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-120151024w.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-120151024w.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-120151024w
- **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/120151024W
**body:**

Warning Letter involving ALGONQUIN GAS TRANSMISSION, L.L.C. (SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP). PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulation as 192.305. The case was opened on 2015-09-18 and is reported as closed as of 2015-09-18. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

120151024W_Warning Letter_09182015.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/120151024W/120151024W_Warning%20Letter_09182015.pdf

120151024W_Warning Letter_09182015_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/120151024W/120151024W_Warning%20Letter_09182015_text.pdf

120151024W_Warning Letter_09182015_text.pdf

U.S. Department Of Transportation Pipeline and 609.989.2171
Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
820 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 103
West Trenton, NJ 08628
WARNING LETTER
OVERNIGHT EXPRESS DELIVERY
September 18, 2015
J. Andrew Drake
Vice President, Operations & EHS
Algonquin Gas Transmission Co (Spectra Energy Corp)
5400 Westheimer Court
Houston, TX 77056
CPF 1-2015-1024W
Dear Mr. Drake:
On August 5, 2015, an inspector from the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental
Protection (CT DEEP) acting as Agent for the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code inspected
the Algonquin Gas Transmission Company (AGT) main construction work along the pipeline right-of-
way (ROW) downstream of Fitch Hill Road, Montville, Connecticut.
As a result of the inspection, it appears that you have committed probable violations of the Pipeline Safety
Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. The items inspected and the probable violation is:
1. §192.305 Inspection: General.
Each transmission line or main must be inspected to ensure that it is constructed in accordance
with this part.
AGT failed to ensure that a transmission main was constructed in accordance with Subpart G
requirements, specifically in compliance with operator specifications or standards required by §192.303
which states: “Each transmission line or main must be constructed in accordance with comprehensive
written specifications or standards that are consistent with this part.”
AGT failed to install warning tape in accordance with AGT specifications.
During the inspection, conducted August 5, 2015, the CT DEEP inspector observed padding and
backfilling of the E-1L 12" line installation. The work was being conducted downstream of the Montville
gate station located on Fitch Hill Road in Montville:
1. The new pipeline was lowered into the trench and placed on sand bags.
2. The crew used a shaker bucket to screen excavated material for the backfill around the pipe.
3. Approximately 100 to 150 feet of pipeline was backfilled to grade.



1-2015-1024W
At the end of the subject work area, the CT DEEP inspector observed that there was no warning tape
visible. The CT DEEP inspector asked the AGT project inspector on site, and he confirmed that no
warning tape had been installed. The AGT project inspector stated that he had questioned the need for
warning tape with other AGT project inspectors and had been told that there was no requirement for
warning tape on this job.
The CT DEEP inspector checked the standards and drawings for this project. The mechanical standards
drawing numbered SG-0007, which is part of the Mechanical Standards package, requires the installation
of 24 inch wide warning tape over the pipe, 1 to 1.5 feet below grade. The CT DEEP notified AGT of
this requirement and the Contractor agreed to excavate down to the line to install warning tape.
AGT failed to install warning tape in accordance with AGT specifications, and subsequently remediated
the shortfall after it was pointed out by the CT DEEP inspector.
Evidence is based on CT DEEP observations, photographs, AGT drawings and specifications, and
statements made by the AGT project inspector to the CT DEEP inspector.
Under 49 United States Code, § 60122, you are subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $200,000 per
violation per day the violation persists up to a maximum of $2,000,000 for a related series of violations.
For violations occurring prior to January 4, 2012, the maximum penalty may not exceed $100,000 per
violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to exceed $1,000,000 for a related series of violations.
We have reviewed the circumstances and supporting documents involved in this case, and have decided
not to conduct additional enforcement action or penalty assessment proceedings at this time. We advise
you to correct the item(s) identified in this letter. Failure to do so will result in the AGT being subject to
additional enforcement action.
No reply to this letter is required. If you choose to reply, please address your correspondence to: Byron
Coy, PE, Director, PHMSA Eastern Region, 820 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 103, W. Trenton, NJ 08628
and please refer to CPF 1-2015-1024W. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this
enforcement action is subject to being made publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your
responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), along with the complete
original document you must provide a second copy of the document with the portions you believe qualify
for confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe the redacted information
qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
Additionally, if you choose to respond to this (or any other case), please ensure that any response letter
pertains solely to one CPF case number.
Sincerely,
Byron Coy, PE
Director, Eastern Region
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Cc: Mr. Karl Baker, CT DEEP
120151024W_Warning Letter_09182015 Page 2 of 2
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 5845
