# PRODUCTS (SE) PIPE LINE CORPORATION — Warning Letter

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** CPF 120155009W
- **title:** PRODUCTS (SE) PIPE LINE CORPORATION — Warning Letter
- **source type:** enforcement
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** historical
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2015-06-16
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** CLOSED warning letter citing 195.561(a).
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-120155009w.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-120155009w.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-120155009w
- **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/120155009W
**body:**

Warning Letter involving PRODUCTS (SE) PIPE LINE CORPORATION. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulation as 195.561(a). The case was opened on 2015-06-16 and is reported as closed as of 2015-06-16. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

120155009W_Warning Letter_06162015.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/120155009W/120155009W_Warning%20Letter_06162015.pdf

120155009W_Warning Letter_06162015_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/120155009W/120155009W_Warning%20Letter_06162015_text.pdf

120155009W_Warning Letter_06162015_text.pdf

U.S. Department Of Transportation Pipeline and 609.989.2171
Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
820 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 103
West Trenton, NJ 08628
WARNING LETTER
OVERNIGHT EXPRESS DELIVERY
June 16, 2015
Mr. Wayne Simmons, VP Operations
Plantation Pipe Line Company
1001 Louisiana St, Suite 1000
Houston, TX 77002
CPF 1-2015-5009W
Dear Mr. Simmons:
Between August 27 and October 29, 2014, State Inspectors from the Virginia State Corporation
Commission (VA SCC), acting as Agent for the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA) pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code, inspected your Plantation Pipe Line
Company (PPL) pipeline construction activities in Stafford County, Virginia.
As a result of the inspection, it appears that you have committed probable violations of the Pipeline Safety
Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. The items inspected and the probable violation(s)
are:
1. §195.561 When must I inspect pipe coating used for external corrosion control?
(a) You must inspect all external pipe coating required by §195.557 just prior to lowering the pipe
into the ditch or submerging the pipe.
PPL failed to inspect all external pipe coating required by §195.557(a) just prior to lowering/installing the
pipe into the ditch. During pipe installation, PPL did not adequately inspect the pipe coating to ensure
that it had sufficient adhesion/strength to resist damage due to handling and soil stress. PPL was not able
to demonstrate that a coating Shore D hardness of at least 85 was obtained prior to pipe installation, per
manufacturer’s procedures.
VA SCC’s first inspection of the jobsite located off of Arkendale Road in Stafford County, Virginia was
on August 27, 2014. At that time, the weld joints and coating were visually inspected along the 1,060
foot section of 12 inch pipe to be installed. The coating had been curing for several days prior to this
inspection.
VA SCC inspected the jobsite again on August 29, 2014. While VA SCC was onsite, the construction
crew started to pullback a section of pipe. VA SCC noted that additional coating had been applied to the
weld joint areas since their inspection on August 27, 2014.
Upon further investigation, VA SCC found that the additional coating had been applied the morning of



1-2015-5009W
2. 3. August 29, 2014, and the coating hardness was not measured by PPL as required by the manufacturer’s
specifications.
When VA SCC questioned the PPL O&M Supervisor, he agreed that the coating had not been tested for
Shore D hardness.
1. As a result, the PPL O&M Supervisor and VA SCC inspectors inspected the coating between the
fifth and sixth joint using the thumbnail test and a thumb print was left in the coating.
PPL did not have a durometer on-site to measure the coating hardness.
On August 29, 2014, PPL decided to remove the five joints of pipe from the bore hole, and re-
blasted and recoated the joints with SP 2888.
Evidence is based on VA SCC photographs of PPL girth weld, pipe entering bore hole, recoated weld
joint, VA SCC Notice of Investigation (NOI) to PPL, and PPL’s response to the VA SCC NOI.
Under 49 United States Code, § 60122, you are subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $200,000 per
violation per day the violation persists up to a maximum of $2,000,000 for a related series of violations.
For violations occurring prior to January 4, 2012, the maximum penalty may not exceed $100,000 per
violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to exceed $1,000,000 for a related series of violations.
We have reviewed the circumstances and supporting documents involved in this case, and have decided
not to conduct additional enforcement action or penalty assessment proceedings at this time. We advise
you to correct the item(s) identified in this letter. Failure to do so will result in the City being subject to
additional enforcement action.
No reply to this letter is required. If you choose to reply, please address your correspondence to: Byron
Coy, PE, Director, PHMSA Eastern Region, 820 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 103, W. Trenton, NJ 08628
and please refer to CPF 1-2015-5009W. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this
enforcement action is subject to being made publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your
responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), along with the complete
original document you must provide a second copy of the document with the portions you believe qualify
for confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe the redacted information
qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
Additionally, if you choose to respond to this (or any other case), please ensure that any response letter
pertains solely to one CPF case number.
Sincerely,
Byron Coy, PE
Director, Eastern Region
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Cc: Mr. Massoud Tahamtani, VA SCC
120155009W_Warning Letter_06162015 Page 2 of 2
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 5662
