{"operation":"document","citation":"CPF 12025048CAO","title":"MIPC LLC — Corrective Action Order","source_type":"enforcement","agency":"Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration","status":"current","official":true,"published_on":"2025-12-19","effective_on":null,"summary":"OPEN corrective action order.","machine_formats":{"json":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-12025048cao.json","markdown":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-12025048cao.md"},"app_url":"https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-12025048cao","source_url":"https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/12025048CAO","body":"Corrective Action Order involving MIPC LLC. The dataset does not identify a cited regulation for this case. The case was opened on 2025-12-19 and is reported as open. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.\n\nOfficial case documents:\n\n12025048CAO_Corrective Action Order_12192025_(25-359253).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/12025048CAO/12025048CAO_Corrective%20Action%20Order_12192025_(25-359253).pdf\n\n12025048CAO_Corrective Action Order_12192025_(25-359253)_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/12025048CAO/12025048CAO_Corrective%20Action%20Order_12192025_(25-359253)_text.pdf\n\n12025048CAO_Corrective Action Order_12192025_(25-359253)_text.pdf\n\nU.S. Department\nof Transportation\nPipeline and Hazardous\nMaterials Safety\nAdministration\n1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE\nWashington, DC 20590\nDecember 19, 2025\nVIA ELECTRONIC MAIL TO: jeff.warmann@monroe-energy.com\nJeff Warmann\nPresident and CEO\nMIPC, LLC\n920 Cherry Tree Road\nAston, PA 19014\nCPF No. 1-2025-048-CAO\nDear Mr. Warmann:\nEnclosed please find the Corrective Action Order (CAO or Order) issued by the Pipeline and\nHazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), in the\nabove-referenced case. It requires MIPC, LLC (MIPC or Respondent), a wholly owned\nsubsidiary of Monroe Energy, LLC, to take certain corrective actions with respect to the failure\nof Tank 708 which occurred at its Chelsea Tank Farm in Aston, Pennsylvania.\nService of the CAO by electronic transmission is deemed complete upon transmission and\nacknowledgment of receipt, or as otherwise provided under 49 CFR § 190.5. The terms and\nconditions of this Order are effective upon completion of service.\nSincerely,\nLinda Daugherty\nActing Associate Administrator\nfor Pipeline Safety\nEnclosure: CAO\ncc: Robert Burrough, Director, Eastern Region, Office of Pipeline Safety, PHMSA\nCaroline Kerr, MIPC Regulatory Compliance Lead, MIPC, LLC,\ncaroline.kerr@monroe-energy.com\nChristine Shorokey, Vice President and General Manager, MIPC, LLC,\n\n\n\nchris.shorokey@monroe-energy.com\nJohn Bowen, Pipeline Safety Lead, MIPC, LLC, john.bowen@monroe-energy.com\nCONFIRMATION OF RECEIPT REQUESTED\n\n\n\nCPF No. 1-2025-048-CAO\nPage 1\nU.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION\nPIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION\nOFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY\nWASHINGTON, D.C. 20590\n____________________________________\nIn the Matter of )\nMIPC, LLC, ) CPF No. 1-2025-048-CAO\na subsidiary of Monroe Energy, LLC, )\n)\n)\n)\nRespondent. )\n____________________________________)\nCORRECTIVE ACTION ORDER\nPurpose and Background\nThis Corrective Action Order (CAO or Order) is being issued by the Pipeline and Hazardous\nMaterials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), under the authority\nof 49 U.S.C. § 60112 and 49 CFR § 190.233 to require MIPC, LLC (MIPC or Respondent) to take\nthe necessary corrective actions to protect the public, property, and the environment from potential\nhazards associated with the December 5, 2025, reportable accident resulting in the release of\nhazardous liquid from MIPC’s hazardous liquid breakout tank (Tank 708) at its Chelsea Tank Farm\nin Aston, Pennsylvania.\nMIPC owns and operates a hazardous liquid storage and distribution network that includes 51\nmiles of pipeline, two tank farms, one truck terminal and 25 breakout tanks with a total tankage\ncapacity of 2.75 million barrels. One of those tank farms, Chelsea Tank Farm, is located in Aston,\nPennsylvania and has 12 hazardous liquid breakout tanks with a total storage capacity of 1.7\nmillion barrels.\nOn December 15, 2025, MIPC notified PHMSA of a reportable accident on a hazardous liquid\nbreakout tank, Tank 708, with an estimated volume release of 9,000 barrels (the Accident). MIPC\nfirst observed hazardous liquid in a culvert on August 18, 2025. MIPC determined the source of\nthe hazardous liquid was Tank 708 and took it out of service on December 2, 2025. On December\n13, 2025, MIPC discovered an approximately 1/4-inch manmade hole in the floor of Tank 708. No\nfires, injuries, fatalities, or evacuations occurred because of the hazardous liquid release. However,\nit appears groundwater sources, wildlife, and vegetation may be affected.\nPursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60117, PHMSA, Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) initiated an investigation\nof the Incident. The preliminary findings of the ongoing investigation are as follows:\nPreliminary Findings\n\n\n\nCPF No. 1-2025-048-CAO\nPage 2\n• MIPC1 owns and operates a hazardous liquid storage and distribution network that includes\n51 miles of pipeline, two tank farms, one truck terminal and 25 breakout tanks with a total\ntankage capacity of 2.75 million barrels.2\n• MIPC facilities include the Chelsea Tank Farm, Woodbury Terminal, and G Street\nTerminal.\n• The Chelsea Tank Farm is located in Aston, Pennsylvania and has 12 hazardous liquid\nbreakout tanks with a total storage capacity of 1.7 million barrels.\n• The Chelsea Tank Farm is located in a high consequence area and surrounded by residential\nhomes.\n• Tank 708, located at Chelsea Tank Farm, was installed in 1951, measures 144 by 58 feet,\nand has a 151,111-barrel capacity.\n• On July 16, 2024, MIPC discovered staining on the chime and caulking of Tank 708. MIPC\ndetermined that the staining was the result of an internal corrosion failure on the lower right\nside of the tank. As a result, the tank was drained and removed from service.\n• On March 3, 2025, MIPC returned Tank 708 to service after completing an API RP 653\nout of service inspection.\n• On August 18, 2025, MIPC observed gasoline on facility grounds at Chelsea Tank Farm\nand began investigating the source. MIPC determined that the volume of gasoline observed\ndid not meet the reportable threshold in 49 CFR Part 195 (i.e., less than five gallons\nobserved).\n• On December 5, 2025, MIPC observed additional gasoline on facility grounds that\ntriggered the 49 CFR Part 195 accident reporting requirements. MIPC reported the release\nto PHMSA and the National Response Center (NRC Report #1449591) stating that the\namount of gasoline released is unknown but may be significant and impacting soil and\ngroundwater.\n• On December 15, 2025, MIPC filed an updated NRC report stating that the release amount\nis at least 760 barrels from a PHMSA-regulated breakout tank or pipeline and that the\nleaking gasoline is affecting groundwater (NRC Report #1450525).\n• On December 17, 2025, MIPC reported to PHMSA that a regulated breakout tank, Tank\n708, storing gasoline leaked with an estimated volume release of 9,000 barrels. MIPC\nstated that the source of the leak is believed to be a 1/4-inch hole in the bottom of the Tank\n708.\n1 MIPC is also referred to as the Monroe Interstate Pipeline Company.\n2 Monroe Energy, LLC, About MIPC, https://www.monroepipeline.com/about-mipc/ (last visited Dec. 19, 2025).\n\n\n\nCPF No. 1-2025-048-CAO\nPage 3\n• On December 18, 2025, PHMSA investigators deployed to Chelsea Tank Farm and\ndetermined that the 1/4-inch hole was manmade and the source of the gasoline leak from\nTank 708.\n• Tank 708 was leaking gasoline from the 1/4-inch manmade hole from at least March 3\nthrough December 2, 2025, when MIPC removed Tank 708 from service.\n• MIPC installed 12 ground water monitoring and recovery wells within Chelsea Tank Farm.\nInstallation of additional wells is ongoing. Recovery of the gasoline from the wells is also\nongoing. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection will oversee MIPC’s\ngroundwater remediation.\n• MIPC tested four residential water wells and has not observed any hydrocarbons in the\nwater, as of December 18, 2025. MIPC will continue to monitor nearby residential wells\nand intends to install groundwater monitoring wells outside facility boundaries.\nDetermination of Necessity for Corrective Action Order and Right to Hearing\nSection 60112 authorizes PHMSA to determine that a pipeline facility is or would be hazardous to\nlife, property, or the environment and if there is a likelihood of serious harm, to issue an order\nwithout prior notice to the operator of the facility to take necessary corrective action, including\nsuspended or restricted use of the facility, physical inspection, testing, repair, replacement, or other\nappropriate action. An order issued without notice must provide an opportunity for a hearing as\nsoon as practicable after the order is issued.\nIn deciding whether to issue an order, PHMSA must consider the following, if relevant: (1) the\ncharacteristics of the pipe and other equipment used in the pipeline facility, including the age,\nmanufacture, physical properties, and method of manufacturing, constructing, or assembling the\nequipment; (2) the nature of the material the pipeline facility transports, the corrosive and\ndeteriorative qualities of the material, the sequence in which the material are transported, and the\npressure required for transporting the material; (3) the aspects of the area in which the pipeline\nfacility is located, including climatic and geologic conditions and soil characteristics; (4) the\nproximity of the area in which the natural gas pipeline facility is located to environmentally\nsensitive areas; (5) the population density and population and growth patterns of the area in which\nthe pipeline facility is located; (6) any recommendation of the National Transportation Safety\nBoard made under another law; and (7) other factors PHMSA may considers appropriate.\nAfter evaluating the foregoing preliminary findings of fact, and having considered the age of the\nbreakout tanks, the hazardous nature of the product transported and stored, the proximity of the\nbreakout tanks to groundwater and residential properties, the uncertainty as to the cause of the\nmanmade hole, the uncertainty if similar holes are on other breakout tanks at the same facility, the\nduration the leak went undetected, and the potential deleterious impacts to groundwater, residential\nwells, and soil, I find that continued operation of the pipeline facility without corrective measures\nis or would be hazardous to life, property, or the environment, and that failure to issue this Order\nwithout notice would result in the likelihood of serious harm.\n\n\n\nCPF No. 1-2025-048-CAO\nPage 4\nAccordingly, under 49 CFR § 190.233(b), this Order mandating immediate corrective action is\nissued expeditiously without prior notice and opportunity for a hearing. The terms and conditions\nof this Order are effective upon receipt.\nWithin 10 days of receipt of this Order, Respondent may request a hearing, to be held as soon as\npracticable, by notifying the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety in writing, with a copy\nto the Director, OPS, Eastern Region, PHMSA (Director). If a hearing is requested, it will be held\nin accordance with 49 CFR § 190.211.\nAfter receiving and analyzing additional data in the course of this investigation, PHMSA may\nidentify other corrective measures that need to be taken. Respondent will be notified of any\nadditional measures required and, if appropriate, PHMSA will consider amending this Order. To\nthe extent consistent with safety, Respondent will be afforded notice and an opportunity for a\nhearing prior to the imposition of any additional corrective measures.\nRequired Corrective Actions\nDefinitions:\nAffected Tank – The “Affected Tank” means breakout tank 708 at the Chelsea Tank Farm.\nAffected Facility – The “Affected Facility” means all piping, pump units, measurement\nfacilities, tanks, valves, actuators, control devices, pressure relief devices, SCADA\nequipment, sensors, fabricated assemblies, and appurtenant facilities at the Chelsea Tank\nFarm.\nDirector – The “Director” means the Director, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety\nAdministration (PHMSA), Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS), Eastern Region. The\nDirector’s address is 840 Bear Tavern Road, Suite 300 West Trenton, NJ 08628.\nPursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60112, I hereby order MIPC to immediately take the following corrective\nactions:\n1. Shutdown of the Affected Tank. The Affected Tank must remain shut in and may not\nbe operated until authorized to be restarted by the Director in accordance with the terms\nof this Order.\n2. Operating Restrictions.\na. Tank 708 at the Chelsea Tank Farm (Affected Tank) will remain shut-in and out of\noperation until approval to restart is given by the Director pursuant to Corrective\nAction Item 4.\nb. Prior to requesting approval to restart operations of the Affected Tank, Respondent\nmust contract with a properly qualified independent third-party vendor to identify\nthe cause and circumstances that resulted in the Accident and communicate the\ncause and circumstances in writing to the Director. Prior to initiating the\n\n\n\nCPF No. 1-2025-048-CAO\nPage 5\ninvestigation, the Respondent must submit the proposed third-party vendor and its\nqualifications to the Director in writing for approval. Respondent must also review\nits reporting and emergency response procedures, and accurately determine and\nreport the release volume that occurred during the Accident as required by 49 CFR\n§ 195.52. Respondent must also identify any issues or actions with regard to the\noperation of the Affected Facility that were taking place at the from March 3\nthrough December 17 that prevented immediate identification of the release. This\ninformation must be submitted in writing to the Director prior to the initial request\nto restart operations, or in any event no later than 60 days from issuance of this\nOrder.\n3. Remedial Work Plan.\na. Within 60 days following receipt of the CAO, MIPC must submit a remedial work\nplan (RWP) to the Director for approval.\nb. The Director may approve the RWP incrementally without approving the entire\nRWP.\nc. Once approved by the Director, the RWP will be incorporated by reference into\nthis Order.\nd. The RWP must specify the tests, inspections, assessments, evaluations, and\nremedial measures MIPC will use to verify the integrity of the Affected Facility. It\nmust address all known or suspected factors and causes of the Accident. MIPC\nmust consider the risks and consequences of another failure to develop a prioritized\nschedule for RWP-related work along the Affected Facility.\ne. The RWP must include a procedure or process to:\ni. Identify tanks in the Affected Facility with characteristics similar to the\ncontributing factors identified for the Accident, including the age, manufacture,\nand recent inspection history of the Affected Tank.\nii. Gather all data necessary to review the failure history (in service and pressure\ntest failures) of the Affected Tank and to prepare a written report containing all\nthe available information such as the locations, dates, and causes of leaks and\nfailures.\niii. Integrate the results of the metallurgical testing, root cause failure analysis, and\nother corrective actions required by this Order with all relevant pre-existing\noperational and assessment data for the Affected Tank. Pre-existing operational\ndata includes, but is not limited to, design, construction, operation, maintenance,\ntesting, repairs, prior metallurgical analyses, and any third-party consultation\ninformation. Pre-existing assessment data includes, but is not limited to, in-\nservice inspections, hydrostatic pressure testing, out of service inspections, and\nany other appropriate tests or inspections.\niv. Determine if conditions similar to those contributing to the Accident are likely to\nexist elsewhere at the Affected Facility.\nv. Conduct additional field tests, inspections, assessments, and evaluations to\ndetermine whether, and to what extent, the conditions associated with the\n\n\n\nCPF No. 1-2025-048-CAO\nPage 6\nAccident, and other failures from the failure history (see (e)(ii) above) or any\nother integrity threats are present elsewhere on the Affected Facility. MIPC must\nconsider all failure causes and shall use any tests, inspections, assessments, and\nevaluations appropriate for the failure causes in a breakout tank.\nNote: MIPC may use the results of previous tests, inspections, assessments, and\nevaluations if approved by the Director, provided the results of the tests,\ninspections, assessments, and evaluations are analyzed with regard to the factors\nknown or suspected to have caused the Accident.\nvi. Based on the known history and condition of the Affected Tank, describe the\nmethods MIPC will use to repair, replace, or take other corrective measures to\nremediate the conditions associated with the Accident and to address other known\nintegrity threats at the Affected Facility.\nf. Include a proposed schedule for completion of the RWP.\ng. MIPC must revise the RWP as necessary to incorporate new information obtained\nduring the failure investigation and remedial activities, to incorporate the results of\nactions undertaken pursuant to this Order, and to incorporate modifications\nrequired by the Director.\ni. Submit any plan revisions to the Director for prior approval.\nii. The Director may approve plan revisions incrementally.\niii. All revisions to the RWP after it has been approved and incorporated by reference\ninto this Order will be fully described and documented in the CAO\nDocumentation Report.\nh. Implement the RWP as it is approved by the Director, including any revisions to\nthe plan.\n4. Restart Plan. Prior to resuming operation of the Affected Tank, MIPC must develop\nand submit a written Restart Plan to the Director for prior approval.\na. The Director may approve the Restart Plan incrementally without approving the\nentire plan, but the Affected Tank cannot resume operation until the Restart Plan is\napproved in its entirety.\nb. Once approved by the Director, the Restart Plan will be incorporated by reference\ninto this Order.\nc. The Restart Plan must provide for adequate oversight of the Affected Tank during\nthe restart process and must include incremental liquid level fill elevations during\nstart up, with each increment to be held for at least 2 hours.\nd. The Restart Plan must include sufficient surveillance and level monitoring of Tank\n708 during each liquid level fill elevation increment to ensure that no leaks are\npresent when the tank is returned to service.\ne. The Restart Plan must specify a day-light restart and include advance\ncommunications with local emergency response officials and adjacent landowners.\nf. The Restart Plan must provide for a review of the Affected Facility for conditions\n\n\n\nCPF No. 1-2025-048-CAO\nPage 7\nsimilar to those of the failure including a review of construction, operations and\nmaintenance (O&M) and integrity management records such as hydrostatic tests,\nroot cause failure analysis of prior failures, aerial and ground patrols, corrosion,\ncathodic protection, excavations and tank repairs/replacements. MIPC must\naddress any findings that require remedial measures to be implemented prior to\nrestart.\ng. The Restart Plan must also include documentation of the completion of all\nmandated actions, and a management of change plan to ensure that all procedural\nmodifications are incorporated into MIPC’s O&M procedural manual.\n5. Return to Service. After the Director approves the Restart Plan, MIPC may return the\nAffected Tank to service according to the terms of the Restart Plan.\n6. Mechanical and Metallurgical Testing. Within 45 days of receipt of the CAO, MIPC\nmust complete mechanical and metallurgical testing and failure analysis of the failed\ntank, including an analysis of soil samples and any foreign materials. Mechanical and\nmetallurgical testing must be conducted by an independent third-party approved by the\nDirector and must document the decision-making process and all factors contributing\nto the failure. MIPC must complete the testing and analysis as follows:\na. Document the chain-of-custody when handling and transporting the failed tank\nsection and other evidence from the failure site.\nb. Within 10 days of receipt of the CAO, develop and submit the testing protocol and\nthe proposed testing laboratory to the Director for prior approval.\nc. Prior to beginning the mechanical and metallurgical testing, provide the Director\nwith the scheduled date, time, and location of the testing to allow for an OPS\nrepresentative to witness the testing.\nd. Ensure the testing laboratory distributes all reports whether draft or final in their\nentirety to the Director at the same time they are made available to MIPC.\ne. If MIPC deems mechanical and metallurgical testing to be unnecessary based on a\ndetermined probable failure cause, they may request exemption of mechanical and\nmetallurgical testing in writing to the Director. This request must include\ndocumentation to support the decision not to perform mechanical and metallurgical\ntesting.\n7. Root Cause Failure Analysis. Within 90 days following receipt of the CAO, MIPC\nmust complete a root cause failure analysis (RCFA) and submit a final report of this\nRCFA to the Director. The RCFA must be supplemented or facilitated by an\nindependent third-party approved by the Director and must document the decision-\nmaking process and all factors contributing to the Accident. The RCFA must be\ndistributed, whether draft or final, in their entirety to the Director at the same time they\nare made available to MIPC. The final report must include findings and any lessons\nlearned and whether the findings and lessons learned are applicable to other locations\nwithin MIPC’s pipeline system.\n8. CAO Documentation Report. MIPC must create and revise, as necessary, a CAO\nDocumentation Report (CDR). When MIPC has concluded all the items in this Order\n\n\n\nCPF No. 1-2025-048-CAO\nPage 8\nit will submit the final CDR in its entirety to the Director. This will allow the Director\nto complete a thorough review of all actions taken by MIPC with regards to this Order\nprior to approving the closure of this Order. The intent is for the CDR to summarize\nall activities and documentation associated with this Order in one document.\na. The Director may approve the CDR incrementally without approving the entire\nCDR.\nb. Once approved by the Director, the CDR will be incorporated by reference into\nthis Order.\nc. The CDR must include, but is not necessarily limited to, the following:\ni. Table of Contents;\nii. Summary of the Tank 708 failure and the response activities;\niii. Summary of tank data, material properties and all prior assessments of the\nAffected Tank;\niv. Summary of all tests, inspections, assessments, evaluations, and analysis required\nby the Order;\nv. Summary of the mechanical and metallurgical testing required by the Order;\nvi. Summary of the RCFA with all root causes required by the Order;\nvii. Documentation of all actions taken by MIPC to implement the RWP, the results\nof those actions, and the inspection and repair criteria used;\nviii. Lessons learned while completing this Order;\nix. A path forward describing specific actions MIPC will take at the Chelsea Tank\nFarm as a result of the lessons learned from work on this Order; and\nx. Appendices (if required).\nOther Requirements\n9. Approvals. With respect to each submission that under this Order requires the approval\nof the Director, the Director may: (a) approve, in whole or part, the submission; (b)\napprove the submission on specified conditions; (c) modify the submission to cure any\ndeficiencies; (d) disapprove in whole or in part, the submission, directing that\nRespondent modify the submission, or (e) any combination of the above. In the event\nof approval, approval upon conditions, or modification by the Director, Respondent\nshall proceed to take all action required by the submission as approved or modified by\nthe Director. If the Director disapproves all or any portion of the submission,\nRespondent must correct all deficiencies within the time specified by the Director and\nresubmit it for approval.\n10. Extensions of Time. The Director may grant an extension of time for compliance with\nany of the terms of this Order upon a written request timely submitted demonstrating\ngood cause for an extension.\n\n\n\nCPF No. 1-2025-048-CAO\nPage 9\n11. Reporting. Submit quarterly reports to the Director that: (1) include all available data\nand results of the testing and evaluations required by this Order; and (2) describe the\nprogress of the repairs or other remedial actions being undertaken. The first quarterly\nreport is due on March 31, 2026. The Director may change the interval for the\nsubmission of these reports.\n12. Documentation of the Costs. It is requested that Respondent maintain documentation\nof the costs associated with implementation of this Corrective Action Order. Include\nin each monthly report submitted, the to-date total costs associated with: (1)\npreparation and revision of procedures, studies and analyses; (2) physical changes to\npipeline infrastructure, including repairs, replacements and other modifications; and\n(3) environmental remediation, if applicable.\nBe advised that all material you submit in response to this enforcement action is subject to being\nmade publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your responsive material qualifies for\nconfidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b), along with the complete original document you\nmust provide a second copy of the document with the portions you believe qualify for confidential\ntreatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe the redacted information qualifies for\nconfidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b).\nIn your correspondence on this matter, please refer to “CPF No. 1-2025-048-CAO” and for each\ndocument you submit, please provide a copy in electronic format whenever possible. The actions\nrequired by this Order are in addition to and do not waive any requirements that apply to\nRespondent’s pipeline system under 49 CFR Parts 190 through 199, under any other order issued\nto Respondent under authority of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 601, or under any other provision of federal\nor state law.\nRespondent may appeal any decision of the Director to the Associate Administrator for Pipeline\nSafety. Decisions of the Associate Administrator shall be final.\nFailure to comply with this Order may result in the assessment of civil penalties and in referral to\nthe Attorney General for appropriate relief in United States District Court pursuant to 49 U.S.C. §\n60120.\nThe terms and conditions of this Order are effective upon service in accordance with 49 CFR §\n190.5.\n__________________________ _______________________\nLinda Daugherty Date Issued\nActing Associate Administrator\nfor Pipeline Safety","truncated":false,"body_characters":26489}