# BUCKEYE PARTNERS, LP — Notice of Amendment - **operation:** document - **citation:** CPF 220126016M - **title:** BUCKEYE PARTNERS, LP — Notice of Amendment - **source type:** enforcement - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** historical - **official:** true - **published on:** 2012-07-31 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** CLOSED notice of amendment citing 195.405(a), 195.420(b). - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-220126016m.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-220126016m.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-220126016m - **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/220126016M **body:** Notice of Amendment involving BUCKEYE PARTNERS, LP. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 195.405(a), 195.420(b). The case was opened on 2012-07-31 and is reported as closed as of 2012-09-14. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status. Official case documents: 220126016M_closure letter_09142012.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220126016M/220126016M_closure%20letter_09142012.pdf 220126016M_closure letter_09142012_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220126016M/220126016M_closure%20letter_09142012_text.pdf 220126016M_notice of amendment_07312012.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220126016M/220126016M_notice%20of%20amendment_07312012.pdf 220126016M_notice of amendment_07312012_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220126016M/220126016M_notice%20of%20amendment_07312012_text.pdf 220126016M_operator response_08312012.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220126016M/220126016M_operator%20response_08312012.pdf 220126016M_notice of amendment_07312012_text.pdf NOTICE OF AMENDMENT CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED July 31, 2012 Mr. T. Scott Collier Vice President, Performance Assurance & Asset Integrity Buckeye Partners, LP Five Tek Park 9999 Hamilton Blvd. Breinigsville, PA 18031 CPF 2-2012-6016M Dear Mr. Collier: From March 26-28, 2012, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) inspected the Buckeye Partners, LP (Buckeye) Everglades Pipeline in Port Everglades, FL, pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code. On the basis of the inspection, PHMSA has identified apparent inadequacies within Buckeye’s written operations and maintenance (O&M) procedures, as described below: 1. § 195.405 Protection against ignitions and safe access/egress involving floating roofs. (a) After October 2, 2000, protection provided against ignitions arising out of static electricity, lightning, and stray currents during operation and maintenance activities involving aboveground breakout tanks must be in accordance with API Recommended Practice 2003, unless the operator notes in the procedural manual (§195.402(c)) why compliance with all or certain provisions of API Recommended Practice 2003 is not necessary for the safety of a particular breakout tank. Buckeye’s written O&M procedures (i.e. 195 O&M Manual F-37 Aboveground Tanks) did not convey how Buckeye provided protection against ignitions arising out of static electricity, lightning, and stray currents during operations and maintenance activities involving above ground breakout tanks or explain why compliance with all or certain provisions of API Recommended Practice 2003 was not necessary for the safety of a particular breakout tank. 2. § 195.420 Valve maintenance. . . . (b) Each operator shall, at intervals not exceeding 7½ months, but at least twice each calendar year, inspect each mainline valve to determine that it is functioning properly. Buckeye’s written O&M procedures (i.e. 195 O&M Manual F-27 - Mainline Valves and Valve Sites) did not clearly require Buckeye to adequately inspect each mainline valve to determine that it functioned properly. Buckeye’s procedure F-27 - Mainline Valves and Valve Sites, paragraph 2.6.1 stated, “Valves that can be operated by the Control Center should [emphasis added] be operated by the Control Center during this inspection to ensure remote functionality.” The word “should” is commonly defined to mean an obligation; yet, when conveying an obligation “should” is not as clear as words such as “must” or “shall. ” The Everglades Pipeline had seven mainline valves with remote control capability; therefore, Buckeye’s procedures must clearly obligate it to test the functionality of the remote operation of these valves. Response to this Notice This Notice is provided pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 60108(a) and 49 C.F.R. § 190.237. Enclosed as part of this Notice is a document entitled Response Options for Pipeline Operators in Compliance Proceedings. Please refer to this document and note the response options. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this enforcement action is subject to being made publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), along with the complete original document you must provide a second copy of the document with the portions you believe qualify for confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe the redacted information qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b). If you do not respond within 30 days of receipt of this Notice, this constitutes a waiver of your right to contest the allegations in this Notice and authorizes the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety to find facts as alleged in this Notice without further notice to you and to issue a Final Order. If, after opportunity for a hearing, your plans or procedures are found inadequate as alleged in this Notice, you may be ordered to amend your plans or procedures to correct the inadequacies (49 C.F.R. § 190.237). If you are not contesting this Notice, we propose that you submit your amended procedures to my office within 30 days of receipt of this Notice. This period may be extended by written request for good cause. Once the inadequacies identified herein have been addressed in your amended procedures, this enforcement action will be closed. It is requested (not mandated) that Buckeye Partners, LP maintain documentation of the safety improvement costs associated with fulfilling this Notice of Amendment (preparation/revision of plans, procedures) and submit the total to Wayne T. Lemoi, Director, Southern Region, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. In correspondence concerning this 2 matter, please refer to CPF 2-2012- 6016M and, for each document you submit, please provide a copy in electronic format whenever possible. Sincerely, Wayne T. Lemoi Director, Office of Pipeline Safety PHMSA Southern Region Enclosure: Response Options for Pipeline Operators in Compliance Proceedings 3 220126016M_closure letter_09142012_text.pdf CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED September 14, 2012 Mr. T. Scott Collier Vice President, Performance Assurance & Asset Integrity Buckeye Partners, LP Five Tek Park 9999 Hamilton Blvd. Breinigsville, PA 18031 CPF 2-2012-6016M Dear Mr. Collier: From March 26-28, 2012, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Southern Region, Office of Pipeline Safety inspected the Buckeye Partners, LP (Buckeye) Everglades Pipeline written operations and maintenance (O&M) procedures manual in Port Everglades, Florida, pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code. As a result of the inspection, PHMSA issued a Notice of Amendment (NOA) on July 31, 2012. The PHMSA Southern Region received Buckeye’s first response letter to the NOA dated August 31, 2012 and a second response via email on September 12, 2012. We have reviewed the responses and find them adequate. This letter is to inform you that Buckeye has complied with the terms of the NOA and that no further action is necessary with regards to the NOA. This case is now closed. Please be advised that this letter refers only to the NOA (CPF 2-2012-6016M) and not to any other PHMSA pending cases. Also be advised that nothing herein states or implies that the above described O&M procedures meet the requirements of the federal pipeline safety regulations or that the O&M procedures are approved. The pipeline system and O&M procedures remain subject to inspection by PHMSA. Sincerely, Wayne T. Lemoi Director, Office of Pipeline Safety PHMSA Southern Region - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 7836