# SUNPOINTE PLACE APARTMENTS — Warning Letter - **operation:** document - **citation:** CPF 220130014W - **title:** SUNPOINTE PLACE APARTMENTS — Warning Letter - **source type:** enforcement - **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - **status:** historical - **official:** true - **published on:** 2013-05-02 - **effective on:** Not available - **summary:** CLOSED warning letter citing 192.481(a), 192.625(f), 192.721, 192.747. - **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-220130014w.json - **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-220130014w.md - **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-220130014w - **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/220130014W **body:** Warning Letter involving SUNPOINTE PLACE APARTMENTS. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 192.481(a), 192.625(f), 192.721, 192.747. The case was opened on 2013-05-02 and is reported as closed as of 2013-05-02. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status. Official case documents: 220130014W_Warning letter_05022013.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220130014W/220130014W_Warning%20letter_05022013.pdf 220130014W_warning letter_05022013_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/220130014W/220130014W_warning%20letter_05022013_text.pdf 220130014W_warning letter_05022013_text.pdf WARNING LETTER CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED May 2, 2013 Ms. Alice Van Dyk Property Manager Sunpointe Place Apartments 701 East Bay Drive Largo, FL 33770 CPF 2-2013-0014W Dear Ms. Van Dyk: On March 20, 2013, representatives of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Southern Region, Office of Pipeline Safety, pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code, inspected the Sunpointe Place Apartments master meter and downstream piping and facilities at 701 East Bay Drive, Largo, Florida. As a result of the inspection, it appears that Sunpointe Place Apartments has committed probable violations of the Pipeline Safety Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. The items inspected and the probable violations are as follows: 1. §192.481 Atmospheric corrosion control: Monitoring. (a) Each operator must inspect each pipeline or portion of pipeline that is exposed to the atmosphere for evidence of atmospheric corrosion, as follows: Then the frequency of inspection is: At least once every 3 calendar years, but with intervals not exceeding 39 months At least once each calendar year, but with intervals not exceeding 15 months If the pipeline is located: Onshore Offshore ... (c) If atmospheric corrosion is found during an inspection, the operator must provide protection against the corrosion as required by Sec. 192.479. Sunpointe Place Apartments did not inspect its onshore pipeline exposed to the atmosphere for evidence of atmospheric corrosion at least once every 3 calendar years, but with intervals not exceeding 39 months. Moreover, Sunpointe Place Apartments did not provide protection against atmospheric corrosion in accordance with §192.479, which requires pipelines to be properly cleaned and coated to prevent atmospheric corrosion. The PHMSA inspector observed and photographed piping at an insulated union just downstream of the master meter that showed signs of atmospheric corrosion. This portion of pipeline had not been properly cleaned and coated to prevent atmospheric corrosion. 2. §192.625 Odorization of gas. ... (f) To assure the proper concentration of odorant in accordance with this section, each operator must conduct periodic sampling of combustible gases using an instrument capable of determining the percentage of gas in air at which the odor becomes readily detectable. Operators of master meter systems may comply with this requirement by- (1) Receiving written verification from their gas source that the gas has the proper concentration of odorant; and (2) Conducting periodic "sniff" tests at the extremities of the system to confirm that the gas contains odorant. Sunpointe Place Apartments did not present to the PHMSA inspector any records to demonstrate that it had assured the proper concentration of odorant in its pipeline system by receiving written verification from its gas source that the gas has the proper concentration of odorant or by conducting periodic "sniff" tests at the extremities of the system to confirm that the gas contains odorant. 3. §192.721 Distribution systems: Patrolling. (a) The frequency of patrolling mains must be determined by the severity of the conditions which could cause failure or leakage, and the consequent hazards to public safety. (b) Mains in places or on structures where anticipated physical movement or external loading could cause failure or leakage must be patrolled - (1) In business districts, at intervals not exceeding 4 1/2 months, but at least four times each calendar year; and (2) Outside business districts, at intervals not exceeding 7 1/2 months, but at least twice each calendar year. Sunpointe Place Apartments did not present to the PHMSA inspector any records to show it patrolled its distribution system in the residential area at intervals not exceeding 7½ months, but at least twice each calendar year. 4. §192.747 Valve maintenance: Distribution systems. (a) Each valve, the use of which may be necessary for the safe operation of a distribution system, must be checked and serviced at intervals not exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year. (b) Each operator must take prompt remedial action to correct any valve found inoperable, unless the operator designates an alternative valve. Sunpointe Place Apartments did not present to the PHMSA inspector any records to demonstrate that it had checked and serviced its shut off (or key valve) which may be necessary for the safe operation of its distribution system at intervals not exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year.2 Under 49 United States Code, §60122, Sunpointe Place Apartments is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $200,000 per violation per day the violation persists up to a maximum of $2,000,000 for a related series of violations. For violations occurring prior to January 4, 2012, the maximum penalty may not exceed $100,000 per violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to exceed $1,000,000 for a related series of violations. We have reviewed the circumstances and supporting documents involved in this case and have decided not to conduct additional enforcement action or penalty assessment proceedings at this time. We advise you to correct the items identified in this letter. Failure to do so will result in the Sunpointe Place Apartments being subject to additional enforcement action. No reply to this letter is required. If you choose to reply, in your correspondence please refer to CPF 2-2013-0014W. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this enforcement action is subject to being made publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b), along with the complete original document you must provide a second copy of the document with the portions you believe qualify for confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe the redacted information qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. 552(b). Sincerely, Wayne T. Lemoi Director, Office of Pipeline Safety PHMSA Southern Region 3 - **truncated:** false - **body characters:** 6801