# SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS CO — Warning Letter

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** CPF 22023008WL
- **title:** SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS CO — Warning Letter
- **source type:** enforcement
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** historical
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2023-07-28
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** CLOSED warning letter citing 192.605(a), 192.709, 192.745(a).
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-22023008wl.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-22023008wl.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-22023008wl
- **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/22023008WL
**body:**

Warning Letter involving SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS CO. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 192.605(a),  192.709,  192.745(a). The case was opened on 2023-07-28 and is reported as closed as of 2023-07-28. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

22023008WL_Warning Letter_07282023_(20-181668).pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/22023008WL/22023008WL_Warning%20Letter_07282023_(20-181668).pdf

22023008WL_Warning Letter_07282023_(20-181668)_text.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/22023008WL/22023008WL_Warning%20Letter_07282023_(20-181668)_text.pdf

22023008WL_Warning Letter_07282023_(20-181668)_text.pdf

WARNING LETTER
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
July 28, 2023
Ted Meinhold
Vice President, Operations
Southern Natural Gas Co.
1001 Louisiana Street
Suite 1000
Houston, Texas 77002
CPF 2-2023-008-WL
Dear Mr. Meinhold:
From May 17 to May 21, 2021, a representative of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration (PHMSA) pursuant to Chapter 601 of 49 United States Code (U.S.C.) inspected
your written procedures, records, and facilities in northern Louisiana.
As a result of the inspection, it is alleged that you have committed probable violations of the
Pipeline Safety Regulations, Title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The items inspected
and the probable violations are:
1. § 192.605 Procedural manual for operations, maintenance, and emergencies.
(a) General. Each operator shall prepare and follow for each pipeline, a manual of
written procedures for conducting operations and maintenance activities and for
emergency response. For transmission lines, the manual must also include procedures
for handling abnormal operations. This manual must be reviewed and updated by the
operator at intervals not exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year.
This manual must be prepared before operations of a pipeline system commence.



(b) Appropriate parts of the manual must be kept at locations where operations and
maintenance activities are conducted.
SNG failed to meet the regulation because it did not follow for each pipeline, a manual of
written procedures for conducting operations and maintenance activities. Specifically, SNG
failed to follow its manual of written procedures which required it to document each gas and
fire detection system test which are required at least 4 times each year, not to exceed 4.5
months per Kinder Morgan Procedure O&M 550. SNG uses Kinder Morgan (KM)
procedures to comply with 49 CFR Part 192.
KM Procedure O&M 550, titled "Testing Gas and Fire Detection Systems," dated January 1,
2017, prescribes actions to ensure each gas detection and alarm system are maintained to
function properly, as required by 192.736(c). O&M 550, Section 5 “Documentation”,
requires personnel to “Record each calibration test date and results in the daily log or the
I&M system.” O&M 550 references KM procedure O&M 1700, titled “Inspection and
Maintenance”, dated November 1, 2019, which provides an outline to schedule inspections
and maintenance for company facilities. O&M 1700 references KM procedure IM1700, titled
“Inspection and Maintenance Procedures (O&M 1700 Matrix)” which lists various inspection
and maintenance intervals for various components in company facilities. IM1700 contains
I&M Procedure #I-0551.00, last revised 03/12/1999, which requires the frequency to test and
calibrate each gas and fire detection system to be “at least 4 times each year, not to exceed
4.5 months”.
Records reviewed during the inspection demonstrate that SNG documented the test and
calibration of each gas and fire detection system only 3 times per year during the following
years:
• Bear Creek Storage Compressor Station: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020
• Logansport Compressor Station: 2018, 2019, 2020
• Bienville Compressor Station: 2017, 2019, 2020
Furthermore, records reviewed during inspection demonstrate that SNG did not document the
test and calibration of each gas and fire detection system within the required 4.5-month
interval:
• Bear Creek Storage Compressor Station:
o 2018, 02/23/2018 to 07/31/2018 (5 months 8 days)
• Logansport Compressor Station:
o 2017, 06/26/2017 to 11/13/2017 (4 months 18 days)
o 2018, 01/24/2018 to 10/01/2018 (8 months 7 days)
o 2020, 01/30/2020 to 09/21/2020 (7 months 22 days)



2. § 192.709 Transmission lines: Record keeping.
Each operator shall maintain the following records for transmission lines for the
periods specified:
(a)…
(c) A record of each patrol, survey, inspection, and test required by subparts L and M
of this part must be retained for at least 5 years or until the next patrol, survey,
inspection, or test is completed, whichever is longer.
SNG failed to meet the regulation because it did not maintain a record of each patrol, survey,
inspection, and test required by subparts L and M of this part. Specifically, SNG failed to
maintain records for inspection and testing each remote-control shutdown device at intervals
not exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year, as required by 192.731(c).
Records reviewed during the inspection demonstrated the ESD system at the Bear Creek
Storage Compressor Station had been tested on 04/22/2017 and 10/18/2018, an interval of 17
months 26 days. SNG did not have a record to demonstrate that they had not exceeded the
15-month requirement.
3. § 192.745 Valve maintenance: Transmission lines.
(a) Each transmission line valve that might be required during any emergency must be
inspected and partially operated at intervals not exceeding 15 months, but at least once
each calendar year.
SNG failed to meet the regulation because it did not inspect and partially operate each
transmission line valve that might be required during any emergency at intervals not
exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year. Specifically, SNG records
demonstrate 54 instances where valves were not at least partially operated during the 2019
calendar year.
Records reviewed for Bear Creek Storage and SNG Unit 614, called “Valve Inspection
Service Reports”, specified certain valves had not been operated during the 2019 calendar
year by writing “Did not operate” or “DNO” in the “comments” column and did not indicate
either full or partial operation in the “Operated” column. The previous inspections where the
valves were at least partially operated occurred between 08/27/2018 and 09/06/2018. The
next inspections where the valves were at least partially operated occurred between
11/03/2020 and 11/18/2020. The interval between operated valve inspections ranged from 26
months 5 days to 26 months 12 days.
SNG explained that some of the valves in Bear Creek storage that were not operated were in
Lock-out-tag-out due to recent incidents, and therefore could not be operated. Bear Creek
storage accounts for 24 of the 54 valves not operated in 2019.



Under 49 U.S.C. § 60122 and 49 CFR § 190.223, you are subject to a civil penalty not to exceed
$257,664 per violation per day the violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,576,627 for a
related series of violations. For violation occurring on or after March 21, 2022 and before
January 6, 2023, the maximum penalty may not exceed $239,142 per violation per day the
violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,391,142 for a related series of violations. For violation
occurring on or after May 3, 2021 and before March 21, 2022, the maximum penalty may not
exceed $225,134 per violation per day the violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,251,334 for
a related series of violations. For violation occurring on or after January 11, 2021 and before
May 3, 2021, the maximum penalty may not exceed $222,504 per violation per day the violation
persists, up to a maximum of $2,225,034 for a related series of violations. For violation
occurring on or after July 31, 2019 and before January 11, 2021, the maximum penalty may not
exceed $218,647 per violation per day the violation persists, up to a maximum of $2,186,465 for
a related series of violations. For violation occurring on or after November 27, 2018 and before
July 31, 2019, the maximum penalty may not exceed $213,268 per violation per day, with a
maximum penalty not to exceed $2,132,679. For violation occurring on or after November 2,
2015 and before November 27, 2018, the maximum penalty may not exceed $209,002 per
violation per day, with a maximum penalty not to exceed $2,090,022.
We have reviewed the circumstances and supporting documents involved in this case and have
decided not to conduct additional enforcement action or penalty assessment proceedings at this
time. We advise you to correct the items identified in this letter. Failure to do so will result in
Southern Natural Gas Company being subject to additional enforcement action.
No reply to this letter is required. If you choose to reply, in your correspondence please refer to
CPF 2-2023-008-WL. Be advised that all material you submit in response to this enforcement
action is subject to being made publicly available. If you believe that any portion of your
responsive material qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b), along with the
complete original document you must provide a second copy of the document with the portions
you believe qualify for confidential treatment redacted and an explanation of why you believe
the redacted information qualifies for confidential treatment under 5 U.S.C. § 552(b).
Sincerely,
James A. Urisko
Director, Southern Region, Office of Pipeline Safety
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 9665
