# FLINT HILLS RESOURCES, LC — Notice of Probable Violation

- **operation:** document
- **citation:** CPF 320025013
- **title:** FLINT HILLS RESOURCES, LC — Notice of Probable Violation
- **source type:** enforcement
- **agency:** Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
- **status:** historical
- **official:** true
- **published on:** 2002-06-03
- **effective on:** Not available
- **summary:** CLOSED notice of probable violation citing 195.452(b)(2), 195.452(b)(6)(ii).
- **machine formats:** - **json:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-320025013.json
- **markdown:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-320025013.md
- **app url:** https://regulus.evalyn.ai/document/phmsa-enforcement-320025013
- **source url:** https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-data/case/320025013
**body:**

Notice of Probable Violation involving FLINT HILLS RESOURCES, LC. PHMSA's enforcement data identifies the cited regulations as 195.452(b)(2),  195.452(b)(6)(ii). The case was opened on 2002-06-03 and is reported as closed as of 2004-03-11. Proposed civil penalty: $5,000. Assessed civil penalty: $5,000. Open the official case record for notices, responses, orders, and the latest status.

Official case documents:

320025013.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/320025013/320025013.pdf

320025013_Final Order_11252003.pdf: https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/enforcement-documents/320025013/320025013_Final%20Order_11252003.pdf

320025013_Final Order_11252003.pdf

?}
U.S.Deporlment
of Tronspotolion
Reseorchond
Speciol Progromt
Adminislrolion
400 Sevenlh St . S W
Washrnglon. D.C 20590
Noy 2 5 Li,iiJS
Mr. Patrick M. McCann
President
Koch Pipeline Company, LP
411 1 East 37th Street North
Wichita, KS 67201
Re: CPF No. 3-2002-5013
Dear Mr. McCann:
Enclosed is the Final Order issued by the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety in the
above-referenced case. It makes a finding of violation and assesses a civil penalty for the violation.
I acknowledge yourwire transfer dated 1u1y2,2002 for $5,000 as paynrent in full ofthe civil penalty
assessed in the Final Order.
The Final Order acknowledges your submission of amended procedures addressing the
inadequacies cited in the Notice. As further actions are required with respect to amendment of your
procedures, this case remains open. Your receipt of the Final Order constitutes service of that
document under 49 C.F.R. $ 190.5.
Sincerely,
r-
ry Gwendolyn M. Hill
Pipeline Compliance Registry
Office of Pipeline Safety
Enclosure
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RESEARCH AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS ADMINISTRATION
OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY
WASHINGTON. DC 20590
In the Matter of
Koch Pipeline Company, LP,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
) CPF No. 3-2002-s013
FINAL ORDER
On February 6 - 7 ,2002,the Director, Cenkal Region, Office of Pipeline Safety, issued Respondent
a Notice of Probable Violation, Proposed Civil Penalty, and Notice of Amendment (Notice). In
accordance with 49 C.F.R. 5 190.207, the Notice proposed assessing a civil penalty of $5,000 for
alleged violation of 49 C.F.R. S 195.452. The Notice also proposed that Respondent amend its
Integrity Management Program (MP) procedures. Respondent responded by letter dated July 3,
2002 (Response) and did not contest the allegations, the amount of the proposed civil penalty, or the
proposed amendment. Respondent submitted a wire transfer in the amount of the proposed civil
penalty ($5,000), waiving further right to respond regarding the violation and civil penalty, and
authorizing the entry of this Final Order.
FINDING OF VIOLATION
Pursuant to $ 190.209(aX1) and 49 U.S.C. 5 60122,I find that Respondent violated the following
section of 49 C.F.R. Part 195 as described more completely in the Notice:
195.452(b)(2)-failing to identify all pipeline segments that could affect a high consequence
areabyDecember 31,2001. Respondent didnot identifypipeline segments that could affect
drinking water resources (defined by $ 195.6) in Arkansas. Lack of National Pipeline
Mapping System (NPMS) data for that state did not excuse Respondent from the
requirement, as Respondent was ultimatelyresponsible for seeking and using alternative data
sources where NPMS data was incomplete.
This finding will be considered a prior offense in any subsequent enforcement action against
Respondent. I assess the civil penalty of $5,000, already paid by Respondent.



t
L
AMENDMENT OF PROCEDURES
The Notice alleged inadequacies in Respondent's IMP procedures and proposed to require
amendment of Respondent's procedures to comply with the requirements of 49 C.F.R.
$ $ 1 95.452(bX2) and 194.452(bx6xii) for identification ofpipeline segments that could affect a high
consequence atea. Respondent had utilized a buffer zone approach that failed to account for flow
rates, response time, pipe diameter, and elevation when calculating spill volumes for crude oil.
Furthermore, with regard to both crude oil and refined products, Respondent's buffer zone approach
did not account for overland transport.
On October 7, 2002, Respondent submitted copies of its revised procedures, which the Director,
Central Region, OPS reviewed. Accordingly, based on the results of this review, I find that
Respondent's original procedures as described in the Notice were inadequate, but that Respondent
has corrected the identified inadequacies. No need exists to issue an order directing amendment.
Respondent's October 7 ,2002 submission indicated that the revised IMP procedures required by the
Notice would be implemented as part of Respondent's segment identification process and would be
complete byDecember 31, 2002. Respondent shall submit a letter to the Director, Central
Region, OPS stating that the implementation of the revised segment identification process is
complete.
This case will automatically close upon the Director, Central Region, OPS' acknowledgment of
completion as attested to in the required letter.
Under 49 C.F.R. $ 1 90.21 5, Respondent has a right to submit a Petition for Reconsideration of this
Final Order. The petition must be received within 20 days of Respondent's receipt of this Final
Order and must contain a brief statement of the issue(s). The terms of the order, including any
required corrective action, remain in full effect unless the Associate Administrator, upon request,
grants a stay. The terms and conditions of this Final Order are effective on receipt.
NOV 2 5 tiJt;l
Date Issued
iate Administrator
for Pipeline Safety
- **truncated:** false
- **body characters:** 5693
